Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

USA Today: UA forcibly remove random pax from flight

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

USA Today: UA forcibly remove random pax from flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Apr 2017, 21:50
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Grizzled

You're 100% wrong. Airlines can remove pax from planes for doing absolutely nothing wrong, when the only reason is the seat is needed. Prove me wrong with chapter and verse then I'll show where you're wrong.
West Coast is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 21:57
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Why don't you just show the OP where they are wrong, anyway ?

United's Conditions of Carriage are freely available on the Net. To save space, perhaps you could just quote the part that applies in this instance ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:03
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
This 'doctor' doesn't appear to be mentally stable as he races down the aisle after reboarding the plane and chants 'I have to go home, I have to go home':

https://twitter.com/Tyler_Bridges/st...28695360663552
Well considering he had just been assaulted and knocked out I doubt that anyone, including you, would have been totally stable after that.
Jet II is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:04
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Dave
Or you could do your own research.

H97

Are you aware that Airlines are limited on what they can offer?

Jet

He was knocked out now?
West Coast is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:10
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,819
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
Dave
Or you could do your own research.
So you're making an assertion about the rules that you claim apply, but you're unwilling/unable to actually quote them.

Hmmm.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:15
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Waiting for those who've asserted that what happened was illegal, what UA did was wrong and that they are ripe for a lawsuit to back their claim.
West Coast is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:16
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by West Coast
Are you aware that Airlines are limited on what they can offer?
So this is going to cost them millions, and you're saying there was someone who prevented them from solving the problem orders of magnitude cheaper? - then maybe that someone should be forking out the millions?


Go on, tell us, who was it?
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:16
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
Dave
Or you could do your own research.

H97

Are you aware that Airlines are limited on what they can offer?

Jet

He was knocked out now?
Well he was slammed into the armrest and he certainly didn't look conscious when he was dragged off the aircraft.


Jet II is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:16
  #129 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,888
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
So you're making an assertion about the rules that you claim apply, but you're unwilling/unable to actually quote them.

Hmmm.
SOP for dear old Westy...
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:19
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jet II
Well considering he had just been assaulted and knocked out I doubt that anyone, including you, would have been totally stable after that.
Agreed, but if you've ever dealt with a friend or family member who is having a manic episode, sometimes they can be very combative when you are trying to help them. Might not be the case here but I would not be in such a rush to pass judgement on the handling of this incident until more is known.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:23
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 362
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
Dave
Or you could do your own research.
This doesn't fit "Denied Boarding", as he was boarded. From United's terms, I can't see which of the below clauses the passenger fell foul of?

RULE 21 REFUSAL OF TRANSPORT
UA shall have the right to refuse to transport or shall have the right to remove from the aircraft at any point, any Passenger for the following reasons:

Breach of Contract of Carriage – Failure by Passenger to comply with the Rules of the Contract of Carriage.
Government Request, Regulations or Security Directives – Whenever such action is necessary to comply with any government regulation, Customs and Border Protection, government or airport security directive of any sort, or any governmental request for emergency transportation in connection with the national defense.

Force Majeure and Other Unforeseeable Conditions – Whenever such action is necessary or advisable by reason of weather or other conditions beyond UA’s control including, but not limited to, acts of God, force majeure, strikes, civil commotions, embargoes, wars, hostilities, terrorist activities, or disturbances, whether actual, threatened, or reported.

Search of Passenger or Property – Whenever a Passenger refuses to submit to electronic surveillance or to permit search of his/her person or property.

Proof of Identity – Whenever a Passenger refuses on request to produce identification satisfactory to UA or who presents a Ticket to board and whose identification does not match the name on the Ticket. UA shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to require identification of persons purchasing tickets and/or presenting a ticket(s) for the purpose of boarding the aircraft.

Failure to Pay – Whenever a Passenger has not paid the appropriate fare for a Ticket, Baggage, or applicable service charges for services required for travel, has not paid an outstanding debt or Court judgment, or has not produced satisfactory proof to UA that the Passenger is an authorized non-revenue Passenger or has engaged in a prohibited practice as specified in Rule 6.

Across International Boundaries – Whenever a Passenger is traveling across any international boundary if:
The government required travel documents of such Passenger appear not to be in order according to UA's reasonable belief; or
Such Passenger’s embarkation from, transit through, or entry into any country from, through, or to which such Passenger desires transportation would be unlawful or denied for any reason.

Safety – Whenever refusal or removal of a Passenger may be necessary for the safety of such Passenger or other Passengers or members of the crew including, but not limited to:
Passengers whose conduct is disorderly, offensive, abusive, or violent;
Passengers who fail to comply with or interfere with the duties of the members of the flight crew, federal regulations, or security directives;
Passengers who assault any employee of UA, including the gate agents and flight crew, or any UA Passenger;
Passengers who, through and as a result of their conduct, cause a disturbance such that the captain or member of the cockpit crew must leave the cockpit in order to attend to the disturbance;
Passengers who are barefoot or not properly clothed;
Passengers who appear to be intoxicated or under the influence of drugs to a degree that the Passenger may endanger the Passenger or another Passenger or members of the crew (other than a qualified individual whose appearance or involuntary behavior may make them appear to be intoxicated or under the influence of drugs);
Passengers wearing or possessing on or about their person concealed or unconcealed deadly or dangerous weapons; provided, however, that UA will carry law enforcement personnel who meet the qualifications and conditions established in 49 C.F.R. §1544.219;
Passengers who are unwilling or unable to follow UA’s policy on smoking or use of other smokeless materials;
Unless they comply with Rule 6 I), Passengers who are unable to sit in a single seat with the seat belt properly secured, and/or are unable to put the seat’s armrests down when seated and remain seated with the armrest down for the entirety of the flight, and/or passengers who significantly encroach upon the adjoining passenger’s seat;
Passengers who are manacled or in the custody of law enforcement personnel;
Passengers who have resisted or may reasonably be believed to be capable of resisting custodial supervision;
Pregnant Passengers in their ninth month, unless such Passenger provides a doctor’s certificate dated no more than 72 hours prior to departure stating that the doctor has examined and found the Passenger to be physically fit for air travel to and from the destination requested on the date of the flight, and that the estimated date of delivery is after the date of the last flight;
Passengers who are incapable of completing a flight safely, without requiring extraordinary medical assistance during the flight, as well as Passengers who appear to have symptoms of or have a communicable disease or condition that could pose a direct threat to the health or safety of others on the flight, or who refuse a screening for such disease or condition. (NOTE: UA requires a medical certificate for Passengers who wish to travel under such circumstances. Visit UA’s website, united.com, for more information regarding UA’s requirements for medical certificates);
Passengers who fail to travel with the required safety assistant(s), advance notice and/or other safety requirements pursuant to Rules 14 and 15;
Passengers who do not qualify as acceptable Non-Ambulatory Passengers (see Rule 14);
Passengers who have or cause a malodorous condition (other than individuals qualifying as disabled);
Passengers whose physical or mental condition is such that, in United’s sole opinion, they are rendered or likely to be rendered incapable of comprehending or complying with safety instructions without the assistance of an escort. The escort must accompany the escorted passenger at all times; and
Unaccompanied passengers who are both blind and deaf, unless such passenger is able to communicate with representatives of UA by either physical, mechanical, electronic, or other means. Such passenger must inform UA of the method of communication to be used; and
Passengers who are unwilling to follow UA’s policy that prohibits voice calls after the aircraft doors have closed, while taxiing in preparation for takeoff, or while airborne.

Any Passenger who, by reason of engaging in the above activities in this Rule 21, causes UA any loss, damage or expense of any kind, consents and acknowledges that he or she shall reimburse UA for any such loss, damage or expense. UA has the right to refuse transport, on a permanent basis, to any passenger who, by reason of engaging in the above activities in this Rule 21, causes UA any loss, damage or expense of any kind, or who has been disorderly, offensive, abusive, or violent. In addition, the activities enumerated in H) 1) through 8) shall constitute a material breach of contract, for which UA shall be excused from performing its obligations under this contract.

UA is not liable for its refusal to transport any passenger or for its removal of any passenger in accordance with this Rule. A Passenger who is removed or refused transportation in accordance with this Rule may be eligible for a refund upon request. See Rule 27 A). As an express precondition to issuance of any refund, UA shall not be responsible for damages of any kind whatsoever. The passenger’s sole and exclusive remedy shall be Rule 27 A).
Journey Man is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:31
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Journey Man
Passengers who are unwilling to follow UA’s policy that prohibits voice calls after the aircraft doors have closed
Gosh, Thought Police stuff! - you can the thrown off just for thinking something. Maybe they decided the pax who was assaulted and thrown off was only complying with the no-voice-calls rule unwillingly, that would do it.
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:33
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
Agreed, but if you've ever dealt with a friend or family member who is having a manic episode, sometimes they can be very combative when you are trying to help them. Might not be the case here but I would not be in such a rush to pass judgement on the handling of this incident until more is known.
Fair point - but I would just point out that he was a perfect pax up until they chucked him off the aircraft. After all he wasn't thrown off because he was disruptive - it was because the 'computer' picked his name out at random.
Jet II is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:33
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iraq and other places
Posts: 1,113
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Passengers who ... may reasonably be believed to be capable of resisting custodial supervision;
This is my favourite. If you might be capable of resisting, you can't fly. What the hell is that meant to mean?
Katamarino is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:34
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lestah
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Possibly this one.

Passengers who fail to comply with or interfere with the duties of the members of the flight crew.
Local Variation is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:35
  #136 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,149
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
The United staff had forgotten the lesson about breaking guitars (2008) despite saying at the time that they wanted to learn from it. But, for compensation, you can be sure that there are limits the staff can go to and, probably, those limits have always worked. Going higher needs phone calls to those nowhere near the problem who will, probably, tell them to stick to the rules. The staff know this.

To understand the lack of authority that agents and crew have, read 'From Worst To First' by Gordon Bethune and how he turned Continental around. One of the key problems in their customer 'service' was that the staff were tied down by rules set by managers who did not have to implement them, overseen by accountants who could not see the big picture and did not understand 'service'.

Guess who bought Continental ...?
PAXboy is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:48
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Kat

Prisoners are routinely carried escorted with one or two LEOs depending on level of risk.Same with witnesses, runaways, etc. They're a risk to be considered.
West Coast is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:51
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was right. It's gone mainstream news all over the world: Indian Express, South China Morning Post, to name a few. I guess maybe a few UA people might be up fairly late this evening.
rotornut is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:52
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,888
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by marconiphone
If that was the only way of solving a problem, something is seriously, seriously wrong with the industry.
It reflects the way many authorities in the USA deal with the public on the street.

All United had to do was to keep doubling the compensation until someone said yes?
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2017, 22:56
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Smaller Antipode
Age: 89
Posts: 31
Received 17 Likes on 10 Posts
That guy sure gets the drama queen award
Why, he was - apparently ? - just sat there minding his own business when they ordered him off. I would not have been happy, either.

Mind you - if they'd offered enough cash to re-book ...... !
ExSp33db1rd is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.