Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

GoAir A320 engine fire

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

GoAir A320 engine fire

Old 10th Feb 2017, 13:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: South of BBB VOR
Posts: 52
GoAir A320 engine fire

When will Indian media stop reporting

GoAir plane flying over Najafgarh caught fire, forced to make emergency landing | The Financial Express

Alarmist idiots don't know the difference between aircraft catching fire and engine fire.

Any information on the incident?
India Charlie is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2017, 14:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KMCO
Posts: 33
Here's another link to the incident.

FWIW
NWstu is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2017, 14:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 332
Way better than "Mystery as plane ‘bursts into flames’ just before take-off at JFK Airport" right?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/283121...-for-take-off/
flying.monkeyz is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2017, 15:26
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Age: 65
Posts: 60
@India Charlie

I always thought an engine (when installed) was part of the aircraft.

Oh if we were all experts in each others field
golfbananajam is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2017, 16:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,125
India Charlie you think engine fire shouldn't cause alarm? So you wouldn't be using May Day I suppose.
vilas is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2017, 16:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangkok, Paris
Posts: 53
Er, pardon me, but the second article linked above says "they spotted fire and smoke coming out of the tail of GoAir G8-557".
How does this fit an engine fire?
alainthailande is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2017, 23:20
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 10
From Incident: GoAir A320 at Delhi on Feb 8th 2017, engine shut down in flight


On the previous day while flying from Mumbai to Delhi the crew had received a low oil pressure indication enroute about one hour into the flight, some time later a magnetic chip detector warning came up. Following safe landing the licensed aircraft maintenance engineers (LAME) should have checked the engine due to the magnetic chip detector indication, however, returned the aircraft to service under minimum equipment list requirements permitting it to continue for 10 hours. The aircraft subsequently flew to Leh, could not land there and returned to Delhi, then flew to Guwahati and back. The LAMEs checking the aircraft before departure to Banglaore did not realize that the aircraft had already done 9 hours and would be beyond the 10 hours under MEL upon arrival into Bangalore. The DGCA suspended the license of one of the LAMEs involved pending investigation.

The airline reported they strictly complied with the maintenance regulations by the manufacturer, which permitted up to 10 hours under MEL following a magnetic chip detector indication until the cause of the indication was to be determined.
mivens is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2017, 03:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Perth, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Age: 69
Posts: 846
Did I imagine it, or was one previous post naming the engine type deleted?
Also, there seems to be some gaps in this story that would be handy to know.

1) There is no mention (or confirmation) of whether the chip detectors were ever cleaned/ re-set. Unless I am mistaken, failure to do so will bring up continuous or repeated alarms.

2) Is it correct that the engine manufacturer approves operation of the engine following a LOP alarm AND chip detector alarm?
Seems a bit cavalier.
I can imagine approval of operation under MEL following a chip alarm provided it has been cleaned / re-set and the alarm does not re-occur but those details are not confirmed by any of the preceding posts.

3) In fact, it seems from the information above that the operator may just be using the MEL provision as a means to defer appropriate troubleshooting / repair.

To be fair, it's all a bit hazy, and maybe I'm inferring too much - or, maybe not.
WingNut60 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.