Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

LH E195 took off without clearance at BRU

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

LH E195 took off without clearance at BRU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Oct 2016, 08:40
  #21 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scuffers :
I can see how mistakes can happen
No you don't.

, I'm amazed anybody can understand that real-time.
Well as said before , this is likely from a hand held scanner , the ATC real R/T quality is generally much better but not always ( thinking more HF) , no generally mistakes like this do not happen because of quality , if you have a doubt , we ask to " say again" . Here the instruction to line up and wait was repeated by the PNF, so understood. No complied with by PF is the issue here.
.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2016, 10:05
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FZRA I thought that the term take-off should no longer be used outside that of an actual take-off clearance. Your example mentions "take-off" twice during a critical period. This is not as fail safe as you may think. Just a personal observation.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2016, 10:23
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never seen this in Europe. But can't this create an additional threat by mistaking the red lights going out for a clearance? Obviously you shouldn't, but many pilots only fly to the US once in a while. Combine an unfamiliar lighting system with fatigue, and mistakes might happen.
The airports with the system installed have dedicated Jepp pages explaining how it works. Those pages stress that the lights going out does NOT constitute a clearance. It isn't a panacea, but another pretty useful layer of safety.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2016, 10:25
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Qwerty
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FZRA So if you do not want your colleague to slam the throttle forward and set off down the runway feeling dumb and happy how about

"Check list complete, line up only"

No need to mention Take off.
Council Van is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2016, 10:28
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My company SOP is to mention the name of the checklist.

I do something similar on landing though.

"Landing checklist complete, cleared to land RW 33"
Check Airman is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2016, 11:00
  #26 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Stop being so stupid, it's Sean's turn
Posts: 1,889
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
No need to say anything at all. There is an SOP that is common to all aircraft once take off clearance has been received. If that SOP hasn't been actioned then you don't go or you double check your clearance.

By the by our SOPs require 3 mentions of "take off" during the line up process, which I think is stupid but They won't change it.
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2016, 11:39
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
Scuffers :
Well as said before , this is likely from a hand held scanner , the ATC real R/T quality is generally much better but not always ( thinking more HF) , no generally mistakes like this do not happen because of quality , if you have a doubt , we ask to " say again" . Here the instruction to line up and wait was repeated by the PNF, so understood. No complied with by PF is the issue here.
.
Ah, OK, good to here.

I have heard better quality audio out of $50 CB rigs, kind of hope million dollar aircraft have something better...
Scuffers is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2016, 12:46
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
Snot a "Takeoff" checklist, it's a "Before Takeoff" checklist. Same Landing.
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 24th Oct 2016, 21:03
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lincs
Age: 66
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FZRA
Hence, when I'm PNF and reaching the end of the take-off checks, I normally say something along the lines of "Take-Off checks complete, we are not cleared to take-off yet" or words to that effect. Just to be sure that the PF is on the same page as me and doesn't slam the throttles forward as we finish the line-up. Does anyone else do this?
Hi there, our company calls them 'line up checks' so the call is 'line up checks complete'
Guess that's one option to reduce confusion.
pilot1957 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 10:06
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Broughton, UK
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I thought the CAA approved buzzword was 'departure'. As in...
''G-ABCD ready for departure.''
scifi is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2016, 11:31
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember, not very long ago, when a particular German airline I flew with always used the term "take off" when making the announcement from the F/D, i.e. "cabin crew take your seats for take-off". I even commented on it here in PPRuNe. This was the standard call by all crew in that airline and it struck me as another potential hole in the cheese. Following a small reshuffle last year, the airline continued operating under a different guise and I noticed that "take off" had been replaced by "departure" in this announcement.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2016, 09:24
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,495
Received 105 Likes on 63 Posts
After saying "Before take-off checklist complete." I always say: "Line up only" in that situation - It is not SOP to do so, but it just seems safer to me.

I have heard better quality audio out of $50 CB rigs, kind of hope million dollar aircraft have something better...
They do, but the equipment is commonly misused. As an ex broadcasting engineer, the quality of aircraft and ATC VHF radio comms sometimes makes me despair. What also makes me despair though is when I say we should snag this box, your radio, your boom set, etc, and they don't understand or they say, "well it seems alright to me."

A lot of people seem to be of the opinion that "walkie talkie" transmissions or anything similar SHOULD sound distorted, so they don't think anything is wrong, but actually when properly set up and used, VHF RT comms can be very good.

Then you have the people whose first action is to take off the microphone windshield - "horrible things" they say; and spend the next 8-12 hours making breath distorted RT and interphone calls while their spit and germs fill up the bare microphone. This stops the noise cancelling from working and makes all their transmissions very noisy. "station calling?"



Phew, that's better. I'm off to have a quiet lie down...........!


(For best results, use a windshield and place the microphone a finger's width away from your lips, otherwise the noise cancelling won't work. Squeeze the windshield so you can feel the shape of the microphone - some are drum shaped, others flat - and rotate the microphone so you are speaking into its surface not its edge, otherwise - again - the noise cancelling won't work and your transmissions will be hard to understand. Speak slowly, and at normal speaking volume.)

Last edited by Uplinker; 26th Oct 2016 at 10:04.
Uplinker is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2017, 15:12
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hadlow
Age: 60
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Final report is out.

https://mobilit.belgium.be/sites/def...nal_report.pdf
Super VC-10 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2017, 15:57
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It would make sense for "danger" runways (i.e. those with active intersections) to have a strip of bright lights a few hundred metres in that stay red and only turn green once clearance is given. This system already exists on taxiways so why not on runways?
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2017, 17:48
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They do have a system like this in some places in Japan - e.g. Sapporo IIRC
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2017, 18:04
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 76
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the proximity of the conflict yet known.
Chronus is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2017, 07:33
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Welcome to the 21st century.
Maybe time to go back to Aldis light signals aimed at the cockpit. Green for clear take off and red for don't take off.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2017, 08:00
  #38 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Swiss cheese at work again.
parkfell is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2017, 08:38
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Centaurus... like to see that system works in LVPs!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2017, 09:14
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe time to go back to Aldis light signals aimed at the cockpit. Green for clear take off and red for don't take off.

Red stop bars on the runway at line up. ON = hold. Off = cleared to launch. Considering AC's incident at SFO, the green threshold lights of an active runway could be changed to red when the runway is closed, or it's not a runway at all.
RAT 5 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.