Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

United Airlines flight UA929 London to Chicago makes emergency landing

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

United Airlines flight UA929 London to Chicago makes emergency landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jul 2016, 11:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wallisellen, Switzerland
Age: 75
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
United Airlines flight UA929 London to Chicago makes emergency landing

https://www.rt.com/news/350752-ua929...mergency-turn/
AmericanFlyer is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 15:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Maine USA
Age: 82
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC says a fuel leak.

Plane makes emergency landing in Edinburgh after fuel leak - BBC News
PersonFromPorlock is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 18:52
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My first question is...

Did they ask for the fire equipment to be standing by the runway for their landing? :-)

Last edited by Jet Jockey A4; 12th Jul 2016 at 21:39.
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 19:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Not far from a lot of solar panels.
Posts: 174
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Nice picture of a (ahem!) B763 in AF's link!

Dream on, journo!
Null Orifice is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 21:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: localhost
Age: 25
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jet Jockey A4
Did they ask for the fire equipment to be standing by the runway for their landing?
I wouldn't have thought so; apparently the new SOP is to sit tight and watch the bonfire out the window
crablab is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 21:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's something ironic about having to dump fuel because of a fuel leak.

(Yes, balance, overweight, blah blah.)
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 21:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<Did they ask for the fire equipment to be standing by the runway for their landing?
Jet Jockey A4 is online now Report Post >>

They wouldn't have to. ATC would have made that decision.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2016, 21:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: behind the fruit
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They wouldn't have to. ATC would have made that decision.
...which isn't a decision. It's standard procedure / response to a PAN or MAYDAY
LEGAL TENDER is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2016, 02:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,561
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
apparently the new SOP is to sit tight and watch the bonfire out the window
SOPs are about to be rewritten to accommodate plastic wings!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2016, 06:16
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hampshire
Age: 76
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was not a good day for trans-Atlantic flights from Heathrow yesterday. AA105 departed for JFK at around 16:55L, got as far as Swindon, squawked 7700 and returned to LHR where it remains this morning. It has been rescheduled for departure today at 19:30.
KelvinD is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2016, 14:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newcastle
Age: 53
Posts: 614
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
United Airlines flight UA929 London to Chicago makes emergency landing
Looks like she is returning back to EDI again squawking 7700.
MATELO is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2016, 14:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: N. Ireland
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UAL2081

UAL2081 returning to EDI squawk 7700
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...-fife-36785899

Last edited by nie2000; 13th Jul 2016 at 16:18. Reason: update with link
nie2000 is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2016, 16:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Second star to the right, and straight on 'til morning
Age: 63
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nie2000
UA2081 appeared to climb normally until it was in the vicinity of Glasgow but then stopped the climb at FL220. It then continued straight ahead and descended to FL180, taking up a holding pattern south of Tiree, After a number of orbits it began heading back towards EDI at which point it began squawking 7700. It didn't circle Edinburgh for ten minutes as reported in the BBC. It returned over Fife for an immediate approach and landing on runway 24.
Porrohman is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2016, 09:52
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like the Gaffer-Tape fell off.
phiggsbroadband is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2016, 19:02
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kerry Eire
Age: 76
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There were a number of points about the original diversion which are interesting. The diversion commenced near Lochgilphead northwest of Glasgow close to the ocean. United have flights and support at Glasgow yet the diversion was to Edinburgh where there they have a similar set up.

The flight then proceeded to orbit at between 12000 ft and 9000 ft for a substantial time over southern Fife, Edinburgh and the Lothians before approaching Edinburgh after one eastbound leg extended over the North Sea.

Two questions arise With plenty of over water airspace seemingly available for dumping available close to Lochgilphread and Glasgow, why go to Edinburgh? When Edinburgh was chosen why was the dumping not carried out over the North Sea given the CAA's latest guidelines dated April 2015? viz:

Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1 Civil Aviation Authority, Section 5 Chapter 1 page 12.
(1) the route to be flown which, if possible, should be clear of cities and towns,
preferably over water and away from areas where thunderstorms have been
reported or are expected;

As there were no restrictions over water to the west or east as far as could be seen and Edinburgh arrivals and departures had to be sequenced between orbits, what was going on?
philbky is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2016, 20:59
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by philbky
When Edinburgh was chosen why was the dumping not carried out over the North Sea given the CAA's latest guidelines dated April 2015?
Notwithstanding the BBC report, has it been confirmed that they did actually dump fuel, rather than burning it off to get down to a suitable LW? Not all 767s have a fuel dump capability - early ones certainly didn't , and this was a 25-year-old airframe.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2016, 07:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kerry Eire
Age: 76
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point Dave. Without seeing the wings, we probably won't know but the number of orbits and time taken points to burn off rather than dumping.
philbky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.