Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Lufthansa Reports Near-Miss W/ Drone at LAX

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Lufthansa Reports Near-Miss W/ Drone at LAX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Mar 2016, 16:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lufthansa Reports Near-Miss W/ Drone at LAX

Lufthansa Reports Near-Miss With Drone Over Los Angeles
The pilot of a Lufthansa passenger jumbo jet reported a drone aircraft nearly collided with the airliner on Friday on its landing approach to Los Angeles International Airport, according to the Federal Aviation Administration.


The close encounter between the wide-body, four-engine Airbus A380 and the drone occurred at about 1:30 p.m. at an altitude of 5,000 feet (152 meters) as the unmanned aircraft passed about 200 feet (61 meters) over the Lufthansa flight 14 miles (22.5 km) east of the airport, the FAA said.


No evasive action was taken by the airline crew, and the plane, Lufthansa Flight 456, safely made its landing minutes later without further incident, according to FAA spokesman Ian Gregor.
Towhee is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2016, 19:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5000 ft = 1524m;

Why does aviation continue to use outdated avoirdupois measurements?
ExXB is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2016, 19:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North West UK
Posts: 539
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Because imperial measurements are logical sizes based upon the human body and metric is french invented devils spawn.
Espada III is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2016, 22:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 73
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get it right, avoirdupois is for measuring weights not length!

From Wikipedia:

The avoirdupois system is a system of weights (more properly, mass) based on a pound of 16 ounces.
Offchocks is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2016, 00:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At home.
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Metric

Actually first proposed / invented by Bishop John Wilkins, an Englishman, in the 1600s.

The whole World will be metric at some point in the nearish future, most of it already is, so why not just do it now, it makes sense and simplifies measurement? All the really smart people (Scientists and Engineers) have already adopted it, it is just a few stick in the muds that are holding out because of ancient tradition.

Time to move on and embrace the 21st century.
str12 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2016, 01:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Smaller Antipode
Age: 89
Posts: 31
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Why does aviation continue to use outdated avoirdupois measurements?
You should worry, here in NZ we measure runway length in metres, visibility in nautical miles, vertical distance from cloud in feet, horizontal distance from cloud in kilometres but horizontal distance from a ground based point as a navigational aid in nautical miles, windspeed in knots, forcast wind in degrees True but actual wind at an airport in degrees Magnetic, minimum permitted vertical height from ground in feet and minimum permitted horizontal distance from a feature in metres.

So called "logical reasons" can be stated for all the units used, but it does tax the brain somewhat, and causes confusion.
ExSp33db1rd is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2016, 02:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Windy Capital
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Visibility is reported in metres/kilometres in New Zealand.
The one that gets me every time is the reporting of a distance unit in nm - as if the human eye can spot it!
Mr & Mrs Rocketboots is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2016, 05:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fliegensville, Gold Coast Australia
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
All of which has nothing to do with the LH near hit of a drone at LAX....
Fliegenmong is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2016, 06:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ijatta
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Los Angeles County had better start deploying these:



https://airbusdefenceandspace.com/ne...cit-intrusion/

Last edited by wanabee777; 20th Mar 2016 at 07:07.
wanabee777 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2016, 07:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England
Age: 65
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Au contraire, it does.

Please note the original post, specifically the height at which the drone was flying. Easy to confuse imperial and metric isn't it? Maybe the drone pilot thought he was at 152 metres.

Either that or he was French and couldn't understand what ATC were saying.
Momoe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.