Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

EgyptAir vs. bird

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

EgyptAir vs. bird

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Mar 2016, 00:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EgyptAir vs. bird

Descent into Heathrow:

Bird collision destroys nose of EgyptAir passenger jet landing at Heathrow Airport - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Dean
deanm is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 02:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 82
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

It appears that the bird did not break through to the inside of the radome.
That was fortuitous. Bird guts sprayed around inside a radome and over the equipment are a real chore to clean out. The smell is "offal".
Machinbird is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 09:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have thought it best to just replace the entire nose cone and its equipment.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 09:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wonder if it was one of those red kites whose population appears to be increasing exponentially?
Basil is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 10:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Esher, Surrey
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if it was one of those red kites whose population appears to be increasing exponentially?
I think it unlikely.
There are flocks of Canada geese all around the area so they might be more likely to be the other victim.
beamender99 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 11:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: FL410
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In light of these incidents the UK Government has decided to cancel their plans to expand LHR and other airports on the mainland and move the airport in its entirety offshore on an island away from the influence of birds and other wildlife in an attempt to reduce delays to travellers.

Just kidding of course...
Skyjob is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 11:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 69
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even the mandarins in BRU don't consider bird strikes to be extraordinary. Hope MS was able to brag, borrow or ... a replacement or they are liable for large compensation payments.
ExXB is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 12:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was just wondering at what speed they had the hit.
And also noticed the arrival time of the flight is around 2100.
Didn't think geese were nocturnal flyers; imagine the shock they must have had when they hit it without seeing it coming..
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 12:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 21 Posts
A lot of travellers don't appreciate that LHR is in a slightly odd location given the amount of publicity given to opposoton from London dwellers to expansion. Indeed while LHR is heavliy built up to the north , east and to a degree the south but west of LHR it is largely open countryside or parkland (Royal Parkland) for a good few miles with the addition if some enormous reservoirs and flooded gravel pits which attract huge amounts of birdlife .

It has always had a real problem with birdlife , especially pre T5 when the western end of the airfield itself was home to flocks of birds including Lapwings which was appropriate for the days when when the IATA code was still LAP . The Lapwings went when T5 was built but Canada Geese abound and they brought down Sullys A320 and are a real danger to aircraft being big and knocking around in flocks .

So while its a common occurence it shouldnt be written off as trivial -thats a heck of a dent, I know its only a radome , but it would probably knockout an engine and I am sure the crew would not regard losing one donk at 200ft on finals as insignificant

PB
pax britanica is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 16:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There are flocks of Canada geese all around the area
And where they land they crap all over the place.
Riverside dwellers here put string on pegs across their lawns to discourage the blighters.
Basil is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 17:16
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: eastcoastoz
Age: 76
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GSY,
I didn't think that Canada Geese flew at night, either.
But then, I guess they don't call it a 'goose' for nothing.
Nonetheless, that was one hefty bird they hit.

Birds don't have to be big to cause you grief, either.
In 1960, a Lockheed Electra ran into a flock of starlings on take-off, affecting all four engines.
The consequent crash-landing resulted in 80% fatalities.

In the UK, early 1950s, I seem to remember, a Vampire had a similar encounter with starlings.
While the pilot was able to bring it back to earth safely, the bird-strike damage alone resulted in the aircraft being written off as BER.

And, if we want to go back a bit further, the first bird strike reported was by one Orville Wright, in 1905.
Stanwell is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 17:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GSY,
I didn't think that Canada Geese flew at night, either.
But then, I guess they don't call it a 'goose' for nothing.
Nonetheless, that was one hefty bird they hit.
That's because they don't have their running lights on.

The data has lots of canada geese strikes at night at climb and descent altitudes, spring and fall
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 19:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: WA STATE
Age: 78
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by lomapaseo
That's because they don't have their running lights on.

The data has lots of canada geese strikes at night at climb and descent altitudes, spring and fall
fwiw from wiki

Bird strikes happen most often during takeoff or landing, or during low altitude flight.[7] However, bird strikes have also been reported at high altitudes, some as high as 6,000 m (20,000 ft) to 9,000 m (30,000 ft) above the ground. Bar-headed geese have been seen flying as high as 10,175 m (33,383 ft) above sea level. An aircraft over the Ivory Coast collided with a Rüppell's vulture at the altitude of 11,300 m (37,100 ft), the current record avian height.[8] The majority of bird collisions occur near or on airports (90%, according to the ICAO) during takeoff, landing and associated phases. According to the FAA wildlife hazard management manual for 2005, less than 8% of strikes occur above 900 m (3,000 ft) and 61% occur at less than 30 m (100 ft).[citation needed]
CONSO is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2016, 19:36
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Esher, Surrey
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Riverside dwellers here put string on pegs across their lawns to discourage the blighters.
The Duke of Northumberland's River and the Longford River are in concrete trenches where they flow very very close to Terminal 5 Heathrow. ( a few feet from the peri track) They have nets across them to exclude all birds of all sizes.
beamender99 is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2016, 00:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 542
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Forensic examination

Of the bits still remaining will ID the culprit, hoping it's a Canadian so we can commence a cull of this nuisance
Lucky it was not an engine ingestion then a different story.
Trinity 09L is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2016, 07:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hoping it's a Canadian so we can commence a cull of this nuisance
Cull the Canadians?
Wow, that's radical

Last edited by golfyankeesierra; 15th Mar 2016 at 10:58.
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2016, 11:04
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But it will teach them to keep their geese in check
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2016, 12:34
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No, but the experts will take a gander at the problem.
Wageslave is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2016, 17:02
  #19 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,142
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
Do geese fly at night? Since some species fly at FL300 and above, I wouldn't expect them to climb and descend each day. They are up there because it is the most efficient way to fly. Yes, FL300. Geese don't have altimeters to set to the local QNH, so I would suspect that evolution had geared them to standard pressure (which they should be, up there, anyway)
Herod is offline  
Old 15th Mar 2016, 20:25
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Danger - Deep Excavation
Posts: 338
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How do they breathe at FL300?

I hate seeing birds...
DCS99 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.