Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Possible Boeing 777 Part Found Off Mozambique

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Possible Boeing 777 Part Found Off Mozambique

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 15:43
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: bangko
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CONSO
For those who wonder what the VS stands for - the answer is VOI-SHAN a long time supplier of aerospace standard fasteners.

The HL1013- 6 means simply a 6AL-4V TITANIUM FASTENER 6/32 DIA ( 3/16 )

Thousands of those in 3/16 to 3/8 diameter have been used on most every model and manufacturer of airplanes or missiles for decades. They are batch inspected and certified, and carry NO serial or batch number.

I mention this only to tamp down the ' can we trace that fastener to a particular part or airplane or location ?"


The answer is NO (absent ID of surrounding part(s) )-
(s).
Answer is "maybe"

Each metal batch is close but not identical. Analysis of trace elements can be compared to fasteners coming from same batch - assuming a sister plane used them and one can be removed for comparison
skippybangkok is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 15:50
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: England
Age: 35
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by andrasz
A good photo showing the T7 HS upper surface with the location of the NO STEP labels:

Photos: Boeing 777-31H/ER Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net
I happen to be that photographer.

Here is a full resolution shot of the stab only.



P.S. No copying/distributing without my permission, thanks! Contact via PM if necessary.
dn88 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 15:55
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Near St Lawrence River
Age: 53
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Answer is "maybe"
Completely agree. If it would be an HL1023-6, an oversized used for repairs/reworks, that would be a "finger print" of an RNC that could be linked to a unique tail number.
_Phoenix is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 17:47
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: WA STATE
Age: 78
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question re hi lok tracing

Originally Posted by skippybangkok
Answer is "maybe"

Each metal batch is close but not identical. Analysis of trace elements can be compared to fasteners coming from same batch - assuming a sister plane used them and one can be removed for comparison
Sorry charlie - you need to understand how such fasteners are produced - stored and disbursed. They are ordered months/years in advance of use. They are produced and shipped perhaps on a monthly basis and put into ' temporary' storage by the boxfull. A given production shipment to Boeing of that same fastener could be split into two or three or four batches- at boeing that would be 737, 747, 767, 777 for example since some are used on every model- and part of the supplier production batch might be shipped to one of a " half" dozen suppliers just for Boeing. Other parts of that supplier production batch may well be shipped to St louis, lockheed, Airbus, etc.

But after splittting the " Boeing batch "and being sent to renton or everett or part of the batch being sent to a supplier(s) they are temporairly stored in the closest plant/assembly area before being daily put into ' nearby' to assembly rotobins- replenished at least daily or every other day dependinng on parts, assembly, production rates, etc. Some of the same fasteners in that rotobin ( for example at the ' bottom ' ) may well be three to six months old for a given model.

So a chem/sprectro analysis may well show ' family brother" fasteners of that size- batch on most any part of any plane going back from weeks to months just at Boeing- and possibly any other aerospace company in the world.
IOW- as I first stated, absent a unique flaw in that fastener or out of tolerance composition, tracing that fastener to a ' sister' ship has a VERY low but not quite ZERO probibility of being useful.
CONSO is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 19:22
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 76
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming this latest find is also from MH370, hard to imagine both bits ascended
from 15,000` or so depths. More likely these separated on impact with water. On such a premise there must be other debris afloat. What are the chances that just these two bits came off and the rest went down all in one piece. Perhaps time to call it a day, get heads out of the water, stick specs back on and start using eyeball MK1.
Chronus is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 19:23
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bear Island
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Further to my previous

with thanks to dn88 and the caveat "IF THIS IS FROM A 777"
after scaling to the 35 foot semi span of the HS, the recovered item appears to match a position immediately adjacent to the fuselage.

TR
Teddy Robinson is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 20:55
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Dog House
Age: 49
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure of final paint process but is it possible to match the flaperon with this section via the paint?
Band a Lot is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 21:11
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good call, Bandy.
In another life, I used to be a State Govt. forensic scientist.
Paint matching is absolutely routine.
Examples include paint fragments recovered from a suspect's clothes with that from crime scene window frames or sills, paint particles identified in car collisions (with buildings, other vehicles, victims of hit-&-runs) etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro-spectrophotometry

Should be entirely possible.
Dean

(Of course, the flaperon and wing may have been painted at different times or locations, but the paint batches involved should be traceable - they would paint a whole bunch of flaperons at the same time with the same spectroscopically-identifiable batch)

Last edited by deanm; 3rd Mar 2016 at 21:29. Reason: Added detail
deanm is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 22:00
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sweden
Age: 47
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Couldn't we compare it to pics of the MH17?

Good zoom up here:



and here:



overview:




All these pictures originates from Jeroen Akkermans wealth of photograpic information on Flickr.

Last edited by MrSnuggles; 3rd Mar 2016 at 22:04. Reason: pix didn't show!
MrSnuggles is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 22:05
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snuggy - there seems to be a consensus emerging that Teddy & NiclasB have (in the words of another) 'nailed it' (if you are referring to the airframe location of the 'NO STEP' debris).

Dean
deanm is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 22:13
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sweden
Age: 47
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
deanm

That might very well be the case. I just wanted to give new ideas into the mix.

The found part is apparently compared to an Ethiopian airframe - are we sure the markings are the same across all airframes? Same font?

Just wanted to show how a very definitively Malaysian B777 was marked. For future reference if nothing else.
MrSnuggles is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 22:30
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MrSnuggles
deanm

That might very well be the case. I just wanted to give new ideas into the mix.

The found part is apparently compared to an Ethiopian airframe - are we sure the markings are the same across all airframes? Same font?

Just wanted to show how a very definitively Malaysian B777 was marked. For future reference if nothing else.
Understood, Snuggy: without discussion of 'new ideas', we are stuck with only 'old ideas'!

Dean
deanm is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2016, 23:59
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The thread can reopen when there's some actual news

Rob
PPRuNe Towers is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.