Southwest flight 2547 out of Oakland Lands Safely after Landing Gear Issue
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Southwest flight 2547 out of Oakland Lands Safely after Landing Gear Issue
A Southwest flight out of Oakland International Airport landed safely back at the airport Wednesday morning after a several tense hours circling in the sky following a possible problem with the plane’s landing gear, officials said.
Flight 2547 bound for Chicago departed with 139 passengers on board around 6 a.m. but the captain immediately decided to return to the airport to check on a “maintenance item” on the plane, Southwest officials said in a statement Wednesday morning.
Flight 2547 bound for Chicago departed with 139 passengers on board around 6 a.m. but the captain immediately decided to return to the airport to check on a “maintenance item” on the plane, Southwest officials said in a statement Wednesday morning.
Why not simply fly to Chicago, burning up the fuel on the trip there instead of burning it up flying around in circles?
SWA was going to Chicago Midway, where the longest runway is 6,500 feet long. Oakland has a 10,520 runway.
if you had gear problems, which would you prefer? (SWA had an overrun accident at MDW once - killed a child off airport on a street).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southw...ht_1248_-1.jpg
Pax reported "sparks" during gear retraction, so the exact extent of the problem/damage was unclear. A gear-bay fire might have developed.
Is the gear hanging out and adding drag? You may not be able to make Chicago with the fuel on board.
The first 1000 miles east of OAK are mostly mountains (Sierras and Rockies reach 14,000 feet), desert, and wheat/cornfields, without a lot of places to put down a 737 quickly if something worse developed.
Seems to me (absent more details) it was smart to hang around the big airport, burn off fuel weight if possible, with the option to make a overweight landing on a long runway (with a RON maintenance base) if things rapidly decayed.
if you had gear problems, which would you prefer? (SWA had an overrun accident at MDW once - killed a child off airport on a street).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southw...ht_1248_-1.jpg
Pax reported "sparks" during gear retraction, so the exact extent of the problem/damage was unclear. A gear-bay fire might have developed.
Is the gear hanging out and adding drag? You may not be able to make Chicago with the fuel on board.
The first 1000 miles east of OAK are mostly mountains (Sierras and Rockies reach 14,000 feet), desert, and wheat/cornfields, without a lot of places to put down a 737 quickly if something worse developed.
Seems to me (absent more details) it was smart to hang around the big airport, burn off fuel weight if possible, with the option to make a overweight landing on a long runway (with a RON maintenance base) if things rapidly decayed.
