Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

The Cameron Jet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2015, 04:28
  #21 (permalink)  
RF4
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: CNX
Age: 80
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crew Security

It will be quite interesting to see what if any changes will be made for flight crew security clearance, and also for cabin crew. Dave will want to have some cabin crew I'm sure.

Really I can't blame Dave. After all how can he resist having an A330 with "DAVE ONE" painted on the nose beside a graphic of a hand with the index finger raised. ....or should it read "DAVE # ONE"
RF4 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 04:36
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't see what the problem is with some folk in this country. If as a nation we can afford our staggering foreign aid budget then this is just small pocket change.
LTNman is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 06:25
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 846
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
Virgin have just retired some A340-300's and 747-400's (with more to come)

surely a cheaper option to obtain and maintain one of those?


also will HM and HRH PofW have use of camforceone?
rog747 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 07:11
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Budget

Guys, as a German, I don't really see what's this fuss all about.

Compared to the rest of the budget, buying and outfitting a jet for representative duties is not that expensive. German Air Force operates a whole fleet of jets for carrying around politicians (currently an A340 for Mrs. Merkel and a bunch of smaller ones for ministers), however, they're not (AFAIK) reserved for their personal use. Every couple of years, a politician gets into trouble because he overdid it... e.g. going on vacation on a "official" jet is a no-no.

This has been going on for decades, starting in 1957... no English page on Wikipedia, though. (German page: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flugbe...r_Verteidigung )
RealUlli is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 08:02
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"A bit risk averse.." Odd complaint in the context of the en-route air display routine of the RAF-crewed Voyager.

Seems to be an assumption the alternative is a BA777; unfortunately not always. PM has shown up round the world in machines chartered from various rag-tag second and third-world locations. On one shameful occasion supposedly promoting UK trade by flying an Angolan jet!! Crew security clearance? You're having a laugh, RF4. Aside from the glaring security issue, this just made us look like a fourth rate country.

This is a sensible deal. Aside from anything else, we're already paying for it. If the balloon goes up its available to tank with the rest of the fleet: Rog747, your ex VS option involves buying/leasing another aircraft onto the inventory plus crew-training, maintenance, spares etc; hugely more expensive
ShotOne is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 08:03
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it really a problem as the aircraft has a secondry role as tanker which
is what it is all about and can also carry troops ie: multi role

Ian
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 08:04
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: About to move
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The economical way!

Early 1980's, as pax on a scheduled flight from Jakarta (Halim) to Singapore, I was asked to check-in 3 hrs prior to actual departure. No reason was given.
At the check-in I was told, that boarding would be 1 hour before actual departure. Again, no reason was given. There were only about a dozen pax boarding the SQ727. There were about as many tall, male 'cabin crew'.
Minutes before sheduled departure, there was a red carpet rolled out, and, to the tunes of a marching band, on walked Lee Kuan Yew, then Prime Minister of Singapore, who just happened to be on a state visit.
Slow and curious is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 08:34
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PM Aircraft

"Tony", and all other PMs, got the most suitable BA aircraft available, appropriate for the mission. Anything from an A319 to a B747. There was no dedicated aircraft.
Waterworld is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 08:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Escaped the sandpit 53° 32′ 9.19″ N, 9° 50′ 13.29″ E
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Virgin have just retired some A340-300's and 747-400's (with more to come)
That would be the "german way". We bought a LH A340 and LH Technik did the conversion.
ExDubai is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 09:11
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"VIP" aircraft.

Many of the comments on this thread take me back to 1979 when the RAAF acquired the last two Qantas B707-338's. As a Flight Engineer on the aircraft I, and the rest of the crew, often had to fend off criticism by ill-informed members of the public. They were critical of PM Malcolm Fraser and "his VIP jets". Not only the public, but the Opposition Leader of the era, Mr Bob Hawke, declared he "would sell the B707's". Not only did Mr Hawke not sell the two ex Qantas B707's, his government acquired another five. Eventually four of the fleet were converted to aerial refuellers, but retained their pax/cargo capability.

The reality was that a very small percentage of our tasking was for "VIP" operations, as a look through my log book would clearly show. The aircraft which replaced the B707's are A330's which are multi-role capable and would, if required I am sure, be used to transport VIP's.

As in Australia, the ill-informed in Britian will bleat about any expenditure which they perceive to be "political perks". Look at the big picture folks, your Executive Government Ministers deserve to be transported in safety by your RAF, whenever required.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 09:13
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rog747 - how do you make your sums add up there? The Voyager fleet is already bought and paid for.
fatboy slim is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 10:32
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: glasgow
Posts: 386
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought they were on some sort of PFI deal and the RAF don't actually own them.
renfrew is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 10:44
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Home of the Gnomes
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Tony did have his own personal BA 777 with extra kit fitted for when he wanted to use it. Think it was the one that recently caught fire.
No he didn't and no it wasn't.

HMG chartered a standard 777 from BA when required, if BA had the capacity to spare one.
Tay Cough is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 10:49
  #34 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I thought they were on some sort of PFI deal and the RAF don't actually own them.
Indeed . . .

On 27 March 2008 the UK Ministry of Defence signed a deal to lease 14 aircraft under a private finance initiative arrangement from EADS-led consortium AirTanker
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 10:55
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: farfaraway
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As we have often been told "we're all in it together" does this mean that I can use the plane when His Daveship aint using it?
obwan is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 11:14
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The blasted heath
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm a little confused which is pretty much a permanent state of affairs
Are these aircraft, all the A330s, operated (by which I mean crewed) by civilians.
There are no RAF pilots and cabin crew?
Notwithstanding this I see no reason why the head of state elected and otherwise should not have a decent aircraft for their official use.
gcal is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 11:18
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: La Rochelle.
Age: 48
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
I would have thought this aircraft should be seen as 'UK-One' and not personalised in the media with the names of transient politicians.
clareprop is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 11:19
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 846
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
re buying ex surplus virgin a/c or an ex BA one - i would have thought that was a cheap option TBH - plenty of 340 and 747 mx companies out there -

the RAF lease not own all the 330's and isn't one sub-leased to Thomas Cook airlines and it flies a summer program out of STN for them on long haul charters in an all Y config?

the RAF have cabin crew btw
rog747 is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 12:53
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wales
Age: 81
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what is the paint job? RAF roundels, grey bodied?

If leased to Thomas cook - change paint job?
oldoberon is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2015, 13:10
  #40 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
http://www.findmodelkit.com/sites/de...irbus_a330.jpg



G-CPTN is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.