Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

American A321 Charlotte(KCLT) August 15, 2015

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

American A321 Charlotte(KCLT) August 15, 2015

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2015, 10:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American A321 Charlotte(KCLT) August 15, 2015

From the Wall Street Journal:


"Federal Officials Probe American Jet That Touched Down Short of Charlotte Runway

Airbus A321 had underside of tail damaged in highly unusual incident the pilots attributed to wind shear"



Federal Officials Probe American Jet That Touched Down Short of Charlotte Runway - WSJ


KCLT 160252Z 28004KT 10SM FEW140 SCT250 22/19 A3016 AO2 SLP203 60036 T02220194 53001
KCLT 160152Z 22003KT 10SM SCT060 SCT250 22/20 A3015 AO2 RAE20 SLP201 P0000 T02220200
KCLT 160052Z 00000KT 10SM -RA SCT060 BKN130 BKN250 23/19 A3014 AO2 WSHFT 2345 TSE36 SLP199 TS MOV E P0036 T02280194
KCLT 160042Z 23005KT 10SM SCT060 BKN130 BKN250 23/19 A3014 AO2 WSHFT 2345 TSE36RAE40 TS MOV E P0036
KCLT 160009Z 12008KT 4SM TSRA SCT038 BKN060CB BKN130 OVC250 23/19 A3014 AO2 WSHFT 2345 FRQ LTGICCG E-S TS E-S MOV E P0034
KCLT 160002Z 13012KT 2 1/2SM R18C/3500VP6000FT +TSRA FEW022 BKN047OVC060CB 23/19 A3014 AO2 WSHFT 2345 OCNL LTGICCG E TS E-S MOV E P0032
KCLT 152348Z 20018G26KT 2 1/2SM R18C/4500VP6000FT +TSRA BKN060CB OVC130 23/19 A3015 AO2 PK WND 21026/2346 TSB03E27B36RAE04B34 PRESRR FRQ LTGICCG W TS SW-W MOV E TS DSPTD P0007
KCLT 152337Z 23009KT 10SM -TSRA SCT060CB BKN130 BKN250 25/19 A3012 AO2 TSB03E27B36RAE04B34 OCNL LTGICCG W TS W STNRY TS DSPTD P0000
KCLT 152329Z 27008KT 10SM SCT060 BKN130 BKN250 26/18 A3012 AO2 TSB03E27RAE04 PRESRR TS DSPTD P0000
KCLT 152304Z 18005KT 10SM TS SCT065CB BKN110 BKN250 27/18 A3010 AO2 TSB03RAE04 OCNL LTGICCG TS S STNRY P0000
KCLT 152252Z 18007KT 10SM -RA SCT065TCU BKN100 BKN250 28/16 A3010 AO2 RAB11 SLP184 TCU NE AND SW-NW P0015 T02830161
KCLT 152152Z 00000KT 10SM SCT060TCU SCT250 32/16 A3010 AO2 SLP184 TCU NE AND NW T03220156
KCLT 152052Z 00000KT 10SM SCT060 BKN250 32/16 A3011 AO2 SLP186 T03170156 58021
KCLT 151952Z 00000KT 10SM SCT060 SCT250 32/15 A3012 AO2 SLP192 T03220150

According to Flight Aware: first touchdown time approximately 2237Z and second touchdown(successful landing) time 2254Z

Last edited by airman1900; 18th Aug 2015 at 12:22. Reason: Added approximate touchdown times
airman1900 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2015, 12:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,826
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
According to Flight Aware: first touchdown time approximately 2237Z and second touchdown(successful landing) time 2254Z
That agrees with the FAA's preliminary report, which puts the tailstrike at 22:38Z (18:38 EDT).

Unsurprisingly, they categorise the damage as "substantial".

AIN Notices Report
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 18th Aug 2015, 14:43
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"No items, boy!"
misd-agin is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2015, 19:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KCLT has TDWR. Were any alerts/warnings given? Weather changes fast in that part of the world.
highlandpark is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2015, 22:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ooh! Can't wait to see the final report on that one!
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2015, 23:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this the weather that would have been available to the Pilots:

KCLT 152152Z 00000KT 10SM SCT060TCU SCT250 32/16 A3010 AO2 SLP184 TCU NE AND NW T03220156

some 45 minutes prior to first impact. calm winds, 10 miles visibility, sct towering cumulus at 6000' etc.

Many years ago the US FAA went to contract weather observers and getting a "SPECIAL" observation is still tough.

Of course it is the difference between wind on the ground and during the approach that makes all the difference.
highlandpark is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2015, 01:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,959
Received 412 Likes on 213 Posts
Repeat of http://flightsafety.org/ap/ap_feb96.pdf but with a better outcome.

Be careful out there

https://vimeo.com/135811823
megan is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2015, 08:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Megan - that is a fascinating video. I had never actually realised what a microburst was in detail. I didn't know it was so sudden, isolated and violent. I stark reminder to all that thunderstorms are not to be messed with.
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2015, 22:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What we have been told so far is they had a reactive windshear warning inside 100'. They hit TOGA and did the escape maneuver, hitting the tail on the go around.

Waiting for more details. Interesting to me is 15* is commanded by the flight director. Tail strike is at 11.5*. Got to watch the pitch and the RA.
cactusbusdrvr is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2015, 22:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The difference between escape maneuver pitch and tail strike pitch is not unique. The 744 has similar limits.

I suppose it's better to scrape the tail than slam into the concrete (or grass)...
Intruder is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2015, 23:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TOGA 10 is the answer here!
fatboy slim is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 00:08
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 300
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It's TOGA and hold the landing pitch attitude, not 10. That is the old version.
Consol is online now  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 01:41
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NV USA
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just remember that is a time lapse video.
cappt is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 15:45
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: farmm intersection, our ranch
Age: 57
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, but your crash will happen in real time...
flyingchanges is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 16:12
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Jackson Hole, WY
Posts: 7,634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I got news for you guys. If a go around is being performed in weather conditions resulting in a descent with 15 degrees of pitch and you lower that to 10 in an attempt to prevent a tail strike, well let me put this delicately..you will not be reusing that aircraft.
737er is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 17:39
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Out of my league, but 737er's comments are in agreement with the accident report Megan referenced:

"The report concluded that lowering the pitch attitude eliminated the altitude margin necessary to escape the wind shear."

"Flight 1016 could have overcome the wind-shear encounter if the flight crew had executed the wind-shear escape maneuver (maximum effective pitch attitude and maximum ‘firewall’ power) immediately after the initial airspeed decay."

The microburst video was most interesting- exactly as described in text, but words don't compare with seeing it happening.
PrivtPilotRadarTech is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 18:29
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: norway
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
About thirty years ago a Delta Lockheed 1011 crashed short of the runway at DFW due to windshear.
It was recommended in the aftermath of the accident that airlines change their simulator training to include recovery from low-level windshear.
After extensive testing in the simulator, the test pilots found that the only way the Delta crew might have been able to save the aircraft would be to increase the pitch to the initiation of the shaker until a positive climb was established.
This is from memory, which is not as sharp as it was, so I might have missed something, but I don`t remember anything about G/A mode or any specific pitch angle.
pineridge is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 22:18
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: formally Alamo battleground, now the crocodile with palm trees!
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

I'd like to know if the crew used a CONFIG 3 or FULL setting on approach.
Squawk7777 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2015, 22:36
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I asked if the ATC Tower had issued a TDWR or LLWS warning/alert. Does anayone know and why is my question gone? It seems a quite reasonable question.
highlandpark is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2015, 04:03
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Oz
Age: 61
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pictures here. UPDATE: Photos show damage to US Airways jet after Saturday incident | | Dallas Morning News
RadarContactLost is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.