UA914 today
I was on brand AA a couple months ago DFW-HNL. Just after top of climb they found out half the lavs were inop. They declared an emergency and went into LAX to get them fixed. The emergency declaration allowed them to land over weight.
No, declare an emergency because they were going to do an overweight landing.
Are you saying they should have kept going 5 more hours with the inop lavs? Or that they should have dumped fuel and then perhaps taken even more time refueling in LAX?
And before you get all out of kilter, here's what Boeing has to say -
AERO - Overweight Landing? Fuel Jettison? What To Consider
Are you saying they should have kept going 5 more hours with the inop lavs? Or that they should have dumped fuel and then perhaps taken even more time refueling in LAX?
And before you get all out of kilter, here's what Boeing has to say -
AERO - Overweight Landing? Fuel Jettison? What To Consider
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Standby, Resyncing other FMC...
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MAYDAY - The radiotelephone distress signal to indicate grave and/or imminent danger requiring immediate assistance
Do you suggest that an overweight landing is an emergency?
"Are you saying they should have kept going 5 more hours with the inop lavs?"
Of course not. Are you saying they can't do an unscheduled landing without declaring an emergency?
What Boeing has to say:
"Landing overweight and fuel jettisoning are both considered safe procedures"
Extremely unprofessional.
Do you suggest that an overweight landing is an emergency?
"Are you saying they should have kept going 5 more hours with the inop lavs?"
Of course not. Are you saying they can't do an unscheduled landing without declaring an emergency?
What Boeing has to say:
"Landing overweight and fuel jettisoning are both considered safe procedures"
Extremely unprofessional.