Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

mh148 engine fire out of YMML

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

mh148 engine fire out of YMML

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jun 2015, 14:03
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"Wonder if they fired the bottle"

Ahhhhh yes, most definalty in compliance with the ECAM they would have fired it....

Why wouldn't they?
??

Because it's kind of permanent and choosing an easier way like retarding the throttle in the case of a leaking hot air duct might be the better solution. You can always fire a bottle later in the sequence as needed.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2015, 23:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1998
Location: between 20 & 30 000'
Posts: 80
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the checklist required the bottle to be fired, the the bottle NEEDED to be fired. Messrs Boeing, Airbus et al spend a lot of time and money with some very clever scientists and test pilots certifying their aircraft and checklists.

It would be rather silly to try to second guess all their work, and do your own thing.

Could also be catastrophic if there was a REAL fire.

That's probably why!
gtseraf is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2015, 05:34
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
westhawk,
Thanks for that post, despite my years in the business, I have just leaned something.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2015, 11:52
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meggitt PLC - FIRE PROTECTION AND CONTROL


No mention of Airbus on above pdf?


Seems Graviner must have the patents well sewn up forcing others to determine a different route...

Last edited by glad rag; 14th Jun 2015 at 12:12. Reason: not relevent today
glad rag is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2015, 13:42
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Lomapaso:----mate do you fly an A or B? We get an Engine Fire warning we follow the emergency ECAM/EICAS checklist and if it says FIRE the BOTTLE we FIRE the BOTTLE.

Air leakage detection loops detect any ambient temperature overheat in the vicinity of the hot air ducts in the fuselage, pylons and wings and are not the same as the Engine Fire loops. Different ECAM/EICAS checklist.


Oh, and as far as I'm aware you can push the Engine Fire switch back in and it resets, even if you've fired a bottle you could still run the Engine.....( assuming it wasn't stuffed and you wish to disregard the warning in the FCOM not to attempt to restart the Engine )

Last edited by ACMS; 14th Jun 2015 at 14:01.
ACMS is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2015, 14:28
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
overheat and fire detections

@ACMS:

On Boeing from 737 up to 787, overheat detection and fire detection are using same detector.

Only temperature triggers either OVERHEAT ENG or FIRE ENG alarm.

And never seen a procedure allowing to push back fire engine switch.. even if technically possible.
VNAV PATH is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2015, 16:37
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,947
Received 394 Likes on 209 Posts
LeadSled, a primer on fire systems should you be interested.

https://www.faa.gov/regulations_poli...a/ama_Ch17.pdf
megan is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2015, 18:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: London
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no argument about fire bottle firing. You do it and argue about it on the ground. If there is anybody here who disagrees with that then please explain how, if you survived, you would answer the barrister's question. Why, Captain Bloggs did you decide not to comply with the manufacturer's and your company's checklist during the incident?
From an old FE who put 2 bottles into number 2 for a false warning into Saigon.
Managed Descent is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2015, 23:17
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
VNAV:- yes I remember the overheat detection on the B. A doesn't have that anyway.

Either way on a A or B if you get a Fire warning you do the checklist.

I'm pretty sure the Fire Switch action is reversible, now as to weather the fire bottle discharge around the inside of the cowling area ( not inside the core ) physically prevents the Engine lighting off? I doubt it would stop it.

I'm NOT saying any proceedure calls for it to be reset or that you would normally want to do it. I was only replying to the comment above that "it's kind of permanent"

Last edited by ACMS; 15th Jun 2015 at 09:24.
ACMS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.