Air Canada A320 accident at Halifax
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia
...no lives lost apparently. Hit electrical wires on landing?
Nothing on news yet, but twitter:
https://twitter.com/hashtag/AC624
https://twitter.com/AirCanada/status/582037344494174209
"Confirms AC624, YYZ-YHZ exited runway upon landing at Halifax. All passengers have deplaned, going to terminal. More updates to come."
Nothing on news yet, but twitter:
https://twitter.com/hashtag/AC624
https://twitter.com/AirCanada/status/582037344494174209
"Confirms AC624, YYZ-YHZ exited runway upon landing at Halifax. All passengers have deplaned, going to terminal. More updates to come."
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,880
Likes: 0
From: Dublin, Ireland
AC A320 accident at Halifax
An Air Canada A320, inbound from YYZ, apparently clipped power lines and "crash landed" at Halifax early this morning. Unconfirmed reports suggests the aircraft overran. Apparently sustained substantial damage.
CBC.ca News - CBC Nova Scotia
CBC.ca News - CBC Nova Scotia
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: North America
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Clipped wire on appoarch to 23
https://twitter.com/KSundahlCTV/stat...74965815611393
metar show cross wind 29- 54knots in the hour before and after incident
Notam:
[DOD PROCEDURAL NOTAM] INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE CHANGED,
ILS OR NDB RUNWAY 23 (GNSS), ORIGINAL, 05MAR15.
CHANGE GLIDE PATH ANGLE FROM 2.70 DEGREES TO READ 3.00 DEGREES.
CHANGE THRESHOLD CROSSING HEIGHT FROM 57 TO READ 59.
05 MAR 13:33 2015 UNTIL 02 APR 05:00 2015. CREATED:
05 MAR 13:35 2015
https://twitter.com/KSundahlCTV/stat...74965815611393
metar show cross wind 29- 54knots in the hour before and after incident
Notam:
[DOD PROCEDURAL NOTAM] INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE CHANGED,
ILS OR NDB RUNWAY 23 (GNSS), ORIGINAL, 05MAR15.
CHANGE GLIDE PATH ANGLE FROM 2.70 DEGREES TO READ 3.00 DEGREES.
CHANGE THRESHOLD CROSSING HEIGHT FROM 57 TO READ 59.
05 MAR 13:33 2015 UNTIL 02 APR 05:00 2015. CREATED:
05 MAR 13:35 2015
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Hmmm....sounds remarkably familiar, but I can't put my finger on it;
1. Legacy carrier with a local reputation for arrogance,
2. Overrun/crash (the 'c' word),
3. PR department refusing to acknowledge the 'c' word,
The only thing missing will be the spending of 10's of millions of dollars in fixing what appears to be a write-off.
1. Legacy carrier with a local reputation for arrogance,
2. Overrun/crash (the 'c' word),
3. PR department refusing to acknowledge the 'c' word,
The only thing missing will be the spending of 10's of millions of dollars in fixing what appears to be a write-off.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
Great quote:
"Spurway [spokesman for the Halifax Stanfield International Airport] said the incident was not a crash because it is believed the plane was under control as it came in. He said there's no indication what caused the hard landing and he did not know the condition of the plane."
Air Canada flight leaves runway in Halifax, 25 sent to hospital - Nova Scotia - CBC News
"Spurway [spokesman for the Halifax Stanfield International Airport] said the incident was not a crash because it is believed the plane was under control as it came in. He said there's no indication what caused the hard landing and he did not know the condition of the plane."
Air Canada flight leaves runway in Halifax, 25 sent to hospital - Nova Scotia - CBC News
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Dubai
CYHZ WX
SPECI CYHZ 290414Z 34024G33KT 3/4SM R14/P6000FT/U -SN DRSN BKN010
OVC018 M06/M07 A2965 RMK SF7SC1 SLP046=
CYHZ 290400Z 34019G54KT 3/4SM R14/5000VP6000FT/D -SN DRSN BKN007
OVC010 M06/M07 A2964 RMK SF7SC1 SLP045=
SPECI CYHZ 290313Z 35020G26KT 1/2SM R14/3500V4500FT/N SN DRSN VV003 M06/M07 A2963 RMK SN8 SLP040=
CYHZ 290300Z 34019G25KT 1/8SM R14/P6000VM0300FT/N +SN DRSN VV003 M06/M07 A2962 RMK SN8 /S09/ SLP038=
If CBC news is reporting correctly (That's a big if!) then the accident occurred at 03:35Z landing on runway 05 which is a LOC only approach. If Jetplan is accurate the METAR above shows a significant windshear near that time.
Glad nobody was seriously injured!
OVC018 M06/M07 A2965 RMK SF7SC1 SLP046=
CYHZ 290400Z 34019G54KT 3/4SM R14/5000VP6000FT/D -SN DRSN BKN007
OVC010 M06/M07 A2964 RMK SF7SC1 SLP045=
SPECI CYHZ 290313Z 35020G26KT 1/2SM R14/3500V4500FT/N SN DRSN VV003 M06/M07 A2963 RMK SN8 SLP040=
CYHZ 290300Z 34019G25KT 1/8SM R14/P6000VM0300FT/N +SN DRSN VV003 M06/M07 A2962 RMK SN8 /S09/ SLP038=
If CBC news is reporting correctly (That's a big if!) then the accident occurred at 03:35Z landing on runway 05 which is a LOC only approach. If Jetplan is accurate the METAR above shows a significant windshear near that time.
Glad nobody was seriously injured!
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 254
Likes: 2
From: SF Bay area, CA USA
Halifax crash
So if the aircraft took out the airport power, does that mean the runway lights went dark? How quickly can emergency generators power-up? Maybe not quick enough.
Landing with only aircraft landing lights. In blowing snow, at night.
Landing with only aircraft landing lights. In blowing snow, at night.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 694
Likes: 1
From: US/EU

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Not even close
Either you crash or you land - there's no such thing as a crash landing. A landing implies control, in this case it appears that they had none.
If you're on an un-stabilized approach and you're so low that you hit power lines coming in and the only two obvious factors that allowed everyone to walk away is that 1. there happened to be a hard and flat surface in the aircrafts trajectory and 2. the slush and snow acted as a fire extinguisher, I'd say that this absolutely qualifies as a crash. Unless they had a major malfunction and this was the best they could do.
If you're on an un-stabilized approach and you're so low that you hit power lines coming in and the only two obvious factors that allowed everyone to walk away is that 1. there happened to be a hard and flat surface in the aircrafts trajectory and 2. the slush and snow acted as a fire extinguisher, I'd say that this absolutely qualifies as a crash. Unless they had a major malfunction and this was the best they could do.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 903
Likes: 24
From: CYUL
It will be interesting to hear if the pilot followed a "proper" slope to the RWY or ducked under or whether perhaps wind shear played a role.
Also of interest is whether they hit that pole or wire causing the electrical black out in the area.
And unlike what AC is calling it; "a runway excursion", I call this a crash.
Also of interest is whether they hit that pole or wire causing the electrical black out in the area.
And unlike what AC is calling it; "a runway excursion", I call this a crash.








