Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Lithium Batteries banned as Cargo on Passenger flights by Canadian Authorities

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Lithium Batteries banned as Cargo on Passenger flights by Canadian Authorities

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th December 2014 | 15:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 630
Likes: 6
From: Canada
Lithium Batteries banned as Cargo on Passenger flights by Canadian Authorities

and about time.

December 30, 2014 10:44 AM - General - Federal Executive Branch, Agency News - Airlines/Aviation - Chemicals - Passenger Aviation - Transportation/Trucking/Railroads

SAVE
Federal government bans shipments of lithium metal batteries on passenger flights
Measure is among updates to the Transport of Dangerous Goods Regulations.

OTTAWA, ON, Dec. 30, 2014 /CNW/ - The Honourable Lisa Raitt, Minister of Transport, today announced a suite of amendments to Canada's Transport of Dangerous Goods Regulations (TDGR). The updates include a ban on transporting lithium metal batteries as cargo on passenger flights in Canada, as well as new labelling and Emergency Response Assistance Plan (ERAP) requirements for certain dangerous goods.

In 2014, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) adopted a ban on the shipment of lithium metal batteries as cargo aboard passenger aircraft. The main concern is that if ignited, they can cause any nearby batteries to overheat and catch fire as well. Most passenger airlines in Canada have already voluntarily banned lithium metal batteries as cargo.

The prohibition comes into effect on January 1, 2015, to comply with the ICAO ban. It applies to all shipments of lithium metal batteries as cargo on passenger planes within Canada. It does not apply to batteries already contained in or packed with equipment, but only to those packaged and shipped separately. The ban will not affect travellers' personal devices such as laptops and smartphones, which use lithium ion batteries.

Other updates to the TDGR include:

Incorporating Protective Direction (PD) 33 into the TGDR. Introduced in April 2014, PD33 ordered rail shippers of ethanol, petroleum crude oil, gasoline, and other petroleum products to have an approved Emergency Response Assistance Plan (ERAP) in place to ensure proper emergency response in the event of an incident or release involving these flammable liquids.
Adding ERAP requirements for petroleum sour crude oil and Alcohols N.O.S. (typically used to classify ethanol in the US), which were not previously included under PD33.
New United Nations (UN) product numbers for petroleum sour crude oil and biomedical waste.


Transport Canada held extensive consultations on the amendments with stakeholders from across Canada. The updates will align the TDGR with UN recommendations and other international norms.

Quick Facts



The new ban under the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations (TDGR) applies only to lithium metal batteries shipped as cargo on passenger aircraft.
It does not apply to batteries already contained in devices, therefore passengers with medical equipment are not affected by the ban.
The U.S. has already banned the transportation of lithium metal batteries as cargo on passenger flights.


Quote

"These updates are welcomed by stakeholders because they promote harmonization and the proper identification of dangerous goods. They will help improve public safety and reduce the risk of accidents while streamlining and clarifying regulatory requirements for shippers and carriers."
The Honourable Lisa Raitt
Minister of Transport
Longtimer is offline  
Reply
Old 30th December 2014 | 15:28
  #2 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Looking on the bright side, at least there's not much call for carbon copying paper these days, which was also DAC.
ShyTorque is online now  
Reply
Old 31st December 2014 | 09:19
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Secessionist Republic of Western Australia
ShyTorque:
Just intrigued about the carbon copy paper- A retired ATPL friend cannot recall it during interminable lectures on the DAC and we both had no idea that it was flammable to any degree more than standard paper.
I quick trawl revealed that it is very flammable, and correct disposal is recommended
This property was missed completely by me during my school years !!
Weeds round the prop is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.