Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Ryanair wants compensation from NATS

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Ryanair wants compensation from NATS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th May 2002, 17:57
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: on the blue danube
Age: 48
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's about time that MOL learned what business is about. He should be provided with the service (or not) he is willing to pay for.

Don't want to pay up for enhancing airspace control? Well, let's start selling AIRSPACE slots to the highest bidder...... Guess who will start crying again.....
OPEN CLB is offline  
Old 26th May 2002, 18:44
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Variing
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
320driver has a point:
most airlines - including Ryanair have been growing dramatically over the past 8 -10 years.
Now, as the system is working on the edge, the fastest growing start crying.
Airking is offline  
Old 26th May 2002, 21:23
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: London UK
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is an interesting topic. NATS do have an obligation to provide a service. However, its a bit like railtrack's decision to close the West Coast mainline every weekend between now an Christmas near Milton Keynes - will Virgin trains get compensation? -I doubt it. All part of the UKs crumbling transport infrastructure.

Perhaps next time the French, Italians, or Spanish go on strike we can claim compensation too?

Whilst NATS is semi-privatised, it is still the Government who control UK airspace through ICAO standards. MOL certainly shouldn't, and won't get any compensation, but I can see where he's coming from in a way. I really hope Swanwick and NATS gets sorted out for everyone's sake. We have the best air traffic controllers in the world, just give them the tools to do their job.
BmPilot21 is offline  
Old 26th May 2002, 21:32
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair have been quite rightly slagged off here for their tacky behaviour -like charging for an interview...but they are right to be hammering the government on this. The airlines pay top dollar for air traffic services. If they are not provided, the government should cough up.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 26th May 2002, 22:24
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
........why bother? Ryanair will hardly compensate their passengers for the cancelled flights.
Mooney is offline  
Old 27th May 2002, 19:32
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to point out, yes NATS caused delays during the morning, but the recovery was hindered when the CFMU slot allocator also failed in the early afternoon. Surely if someone wants compensation, they should go after it from Brussels too. The second failure probably cost more money anyhow, aiding the CLN overload of around 20 Standsted inbounds within 10 mins, resulting in lots of holding therefore fuelburn. As stated, pax won't see anything for cancelled flights, and at least an aircraft on stand aint got its engines on full tilt.

Should Ryanair succeed, surely this could open the floodgates for sueing more widespread, ie. Burger King for burning down part of Heathrow Terminal 'whichever', or Virgin for closing 27R for a few days after the gear failure.........the list goes on....
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 27th May 2002, 20:42
  #27 (permalink)  

Jet Blast Rat
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarfend-on-Sea
Age: 51
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A bunch of British airlines were bullied into buying half of NATS in a half-****d government sell-off, with a threat that it would go elsewhere and out of aviation-sector control if not. I didn't see any contribution from Ryanair in this investment. The whole company is no doing well, so is costing BA, bmi etc money. Why should Ryan whinge?
Send Clowns is offline  
Old 27th May 2002, 20:49
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about Ryanair supplying NATS with a list of the names and addresses of all the passengers affected so they can be refunded directly, missing out the middleman MOL, of course Ryanair will pass on a small sum for the fuel and landing charges they saved as well.....
Ididntdoit is offline  
Old 28th May 2002, 10:36
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On top of the world
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about all the other airlines suing Ryanair for the delays they cause by failing to cancel their flight plans and clogging up the system with 'slotted' departures that another company could be allocated.
hooplaa is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.