JAL 787 hits fire truck in Tampa
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JAL 787 hits fire truck in Tampa
The airport sent out two fire trucks to welcome the chartered 787 carrying the Japanese soccer team. Unfortunately, the plane clipped the truck's boom with the right wing.
Welcome to America guys... sorry 'bout that.
Welcome to America guys... sorry 'bout that.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DisneyLAN
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OMG how embarrassing ! I think the fire truck driver is going to be looking for a new job.
If you taxi the airplane into a stopped vehicle, I wonder who's to blame
Will it make Anna Aero's arch of the week?
Arch of Triumph Archives - anna.aero
On a serious note I hope that there wasn't any serious damage.
Arch of Triumph Archives - anna.aero
On a serious note I hope that there wasn't any serious damage.
As pilot in command, aren't you supposed to be exactly that: "in command"?
If you taxi the airplane into a stopped vehicle, I wonder who's to blame
If you taxi the airplane into a stopped vehicle, I wonder who's to blame
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DisneyLAN
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh! Of course. But this dinosaur knows better: if in doubt set the parking brake. It has nothing to do with the size of the airplane or if you see the tip of your wing. It's about not using the airplane as a shopping cart.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the standard "doing what you have not been trained to do" scenario being played, yet again. This is the ground equivalent of the AF296 at Habsheim. Until people learn, this will happen again and again. But please, let's make sure that the un-constructive comments from superq7 and Glonass are lost in the noise. Blame, firing, sacking, fining have absolutely no part in any safety system.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 82
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the standard "doing what you have not been trained to do" scenario being played, yet again. This is the ground equivalent of the AF296 at Habsheim.
For the JAL pilots, just slowing down might have allowed the fire truck to back out of danger.
For the fire truck driver, expecting the possibility of a wing-truck collision would have cause him to position differently or at least to be ready to back out of danger.
Wonder who the bozo was that thought up this "special recognition"? Someone did not do their homework.
Most airports that use mobile rigs for off stand de-icing have a protocol for what is a similar scenario i.e. vehicles in close proximity to an aircraft with engines running should be a certain distance away until the aircraft comes to a complete stop. Maybe they should have got the de-icing team to do this instead?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Simple Fix
Cost of damage borne by Airport Fire Service as the trucks should not have been there as there was no emergency. If they can show they were directed to be there by the Airport Manager then the airport should pay. The rule is and always has been on the airport surface 'vehicles give way to aircraft' doesn't matter what you are there for they give way.
Therefore, it is always the vehicle's fault.
Therefore, it is always the vehicle's fault.