Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Wasp incident on EY

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Wasp incident on EY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Feb 2014, 15:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On the couch
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasp incident on EY

Planeinsight has tweeted something about an incident with an EY aircraft involving wasps.
Aircraft coming out of Brisbane.
The link is apparently overwhelmed.
Anyone know anything?

Last edited by wild goose; 28th Feb 2014 at 15:44.
wild goose is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 15:47
  #2 (permalink)  
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On the western edge of The Moor
Age: 67
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Incident: Etihad A332 at Brisbane on Nov 21st 2013, "we lost our airspeed"

A little search would have found it!
west lakes is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 15:55
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On the couch
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed.
The initial impression was of something different...
Thanks
wild goose is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 16:07
  #4 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,151
Received 228 Likes on 68 Posts
Being pedantic, they lost airspeed INDICATION. If they had lost airspeed, it would be a different story.
Herod is online now  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 16:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jersey
Age: 74
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
west lakes

Can you mention that airline ?
kcockayne is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 16:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brazil
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The title is a bit of an exaggeration:
Passenger jet grounded by two-hour insect attack ? The Register
belfrybat is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 17:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If this crew did indeed suffer a genuine airspeed indication failure then they did a superb job getting back on the ground safely. Looks like they knew their pitch/power numbers and saved the day. Think how many instances there have been where this situation has proved fatal.
Smudger is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 17:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Defies belief how such a failure (airspeed disagree) doesn't require maintenance to check tubes, but always assume some kind of computer fault.
Superpilot is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 18:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
only a few inches of tube to check on a modern aircraft !
bvcu is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 20:05
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mud dauber wasps are famously active in the US, and elsewhere; the simple precaution of the red flagged cover over the pitot tube must be difficult to practice if the first officer has to climb up a ladder to Remove Before Flight....

Recent National Geographic broadcast on Captain's ASI malfunction that led to Captain's confusion and loss of the aircraft traced the disaster to the humble mud dauber, the crew in this case did well to return to base. Not enough runway to abort, evidently.
mary meagher is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 21:37
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On the couch
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Birgenair 757 off Puerto Rico comes to mind
wild goose is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 21:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
J0357/14 notamn
q) ybbb/qfaxx/iv/nbo/a/000/999/2723s15307e
a) ybbn
b) 1402130551 c) 1403130500 est
d) hj
e) significant increase of wasp activity on ad
affecting pitot tubes on acft
Updraft is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2014, 22:31
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: roundincircles
Posts: 125
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both the aircraft targeted by the wasps were on the ground less than an hour
Something like 54 minutes and 57 minutes only
holdingagain is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 00:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Devonshire
Age: 96
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Much faster fault finding, nowadays !
We took 48 hours, but needed an Engineer sent from base because we did not know what our problem was... back in 1969.


( See " 100kt RTO for Airbus" 20 Jul 2013 #17 )


An engineering modification might blow the bugs out... but needs thought. (Access to Pitots may need ladders.)
Linktrained is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 00:20
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
History repeats

The same thing happened nearly 10 years ago to SQ in Brisbane.
The wasps nest in the Aerobridges and its just a short trip for them out to the pitot tubes.
BACL was supposed to fumigate the aerobridges to erradicate the wasps.
I guess somebody forgot about it, or cost cutting stopped the pest exterminator?
QF22 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 00:55
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Thrust set"
Mentally - speed, speed, speed (4th speed if HUD equipped)
Verify all 3/4 airspeed indications agree.

"80 kts". Verified but already checked.

It's done very quickly and before 80 kts(approaching autobrake RTO trigger speed)
misd-agin is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 03:50
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TYLOS
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very similar incident occurred on a B752 out of Accra, Ghana in 2009 (bugs blocked pitot):

http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/1022.pdf

Very nasty, good job, well done guys..
lookoutbelow is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 08:04
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alloway
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bugs on Guam

This reminds me of the mud wasps during our time in Guam during the 60's we had all kinds of airspeed problems but putting covers on the pitot tubes sorted that but then the little pests started on the PT2 probes in the inlets of our 8 engine B-52's it was common to have to depanel cowlings and blow out lines on many many a/c remember we flew 30 at a time with 8 engines then 30 KC135's with 4 it was a nightmare. So the battle goes on but covers do help on the pitot tubes.
Perrin is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 11:14
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Devonshire
Age: 96
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both EY aircraft appear to have been on the ground for less than an hour, which makes the fitting and removal of Pitot covers less practical, if Mud Daubner wasps are eager to make a " home".

I am no expert in their choices (someone may be). Whether they prefer or reject certain colours or smells could be factor in choosing to "paint" the front of a Pitot tube with that colour. Or a special shade, might be relevant.


( Birgenair had been without Pitot covers for some days in 1996. My Britannia had had both Pitots covered for our 24 hour stay in KIN in 1969.)_

( Swarming honey bees are somewhat choosy about where to settle. And when settled, can be gathered in a skep !)
Linktrained is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2014, 12:33
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 6 Posts
Air Nauru had a take off problem at night on Nauru in the 1980's. Both PT2 inlet probes were blocked by a combination of insects and phosphate dust. This resulted in erroneous over-reading of the take off EPR gauge needles.
While this problem had occurred on previous occasions to one engine and was easily spotted from EPR readings, the incident described occurred to both engines simultaneously.

When toward the end of the take off roll it became obvious the 737-200 was not going to get airborne before the end of the runway, and the erroneous EPR was not suspected during the take off roll, the captain immediately fire-walled both thrust levers and was able to get airborne at VR minus 15 knots. With the end of the runway only 15 metres from a cliff, rubble from phosphate rock deposits on the cliff top, was blown back over the runway.

It was a close shave and a black hole climb-out and the captain did a good job of firewalling the engines with no harm to the engines, as it turned out.
Centaurus is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.