Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Balloon-assisted lack of RVSM

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Balloon-assisted lack of RVSM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 17:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Balloon-assisted lack of RVSM

A bad day at the office - another incident where there were problems dealing with unreliable airspeed:

Balloon hit left A319 pilots with airspeed problem
mivens is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 18:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, well, the pilots' training is one issue, which I'm sure we will explore exhaustively, from both the real experts' and the Flight Sim experts' points of view.

But I would have said that
the presence of hot air balloons in the terminal airspace.
is of equal importance, assuming that it is controlled airspace, given that
a collision with the balloon envelope could have been “catastrophic”, given the forces involved. It points out that there were 143 balloon sightings by pilots last year and that some evasive manoeuvres were of such severity that they triggered cockpit alarms.
Separation from other aircraft is not supposed to rely on a sharp lookout and violent evasive manoeuvres in controlled airspace, and a banner-towing balloon (is there really such a thing?) is an aircraft.

Just issuing a warning is NOT adequate, even in daytime and VMC.

Last edited by Capot; 2nd Oct 2013 at 18:38.
Capot is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 18:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kerry Eire
Age: 76
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Balloon assisted lack of RVSM

Banner towing balloons are not uncommon in the Rio terminal area. I've been taken aback seeing them on visits to the area where they float freely through the terminal area for both airports.
philbky is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 20:20
  #4 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,143
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
If these things are at 12,000' in controlled airspace;

a. shouldn't they be transponding in some form?

b. if they are, why didn't ATC advise of their proximity?
Herod is online now  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 20:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,559
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
Sounds like a good opportunity to practice the unreliable airspeed drill

After all the ITCZ is not that far away and we are all well aware of how badly things can turn there.
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 21:48
  #6 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,143
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
I assumed these are manned balloons, but maybe I'm wrong? What is it doing at 12,000' anyway; nobody can read advertising from that distance.
Herod is online now  
Old 2nd Oct 2013, 22:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brazil
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ballons are unmanned and usually made of paper and carry a spirit or kerosene wick for lift. They can be huge and the banner is usually in homage of some football team or the "club" that made it.

They're illegal due to the air traffic and fire hazards but the irresponsible gits don't care. They're lofted in some isolated place and let drift over the urban areas, where they have caused several fires over the years.

ATC did warn about it but the crew got busy with something else and didn't keep a look-out.
belfrybat is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2013, 06:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capot
given that
Separation from other aircraft is not supposed to rely on a sharp lookout and violent evasive manoeuvres in controlled airspace, and a banner-towing balloon (is there really such a thing?) is an aircraft.
There's plenty of controlled airspace around the world in which no separation is provided for VFR traffic. US class E is one example.
A Squared is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2013, 07:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 567
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Brazilian balloons

Video of the smaller version at French paragliding festival
Have seen larger versions which take a team of six to launch.
blind pew is online now  
Old 3rd Oct 2013, 07:52
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not just Brazil

Smethwick blaze: fire chiefs tell public to stop using Chinese lanterns | UK news | The Guardian

The recent fire in Smethwick is a case in point. I suppose if the wind had been in a different quarter this thing might have drifted into the path of a plane taking off from Birmingham. Even though the metal content of these things is fairly small I guess that they might well cause engine failure if ingested.

Scary.
CRayner is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2013, 10:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: BRS environs
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of those chinese lanterns set fire to a conifer near my house. Right next to parked cars. Idiots.
Vobiscum is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2013, 11:21
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kerry Eire
Age: 76
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Balloon assisted lack of RVSM



This balloon appeared over Barra de Tijuca at around 09.00 on Christmas morning 2009, floating approximately northeastwards. I estimate the height to have been circa 6000ft and, whilst that time was not the busiest in the airspace, two GOL 737s and a TAM A320 were in the vicinity while the contraption was visible.

I would have said that from top to bottom the whole assembly would have been around 70 feet.
philbky is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2013, 12:31
  #13 (permalink)  

Rotate on this!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Age: 64
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I assumed these are manned balloons, but maybe I'm wrong? What is it doing at 12,000' anyway; nobody can read advertising from that distance.

Perhaps they were advertising Breitlings..
SLFguy is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2013, 15:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Age: 59
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It started with a Disney movie..mostly outlawed in the US at this point.
Here at Poznan, they set a record by launching 11,000 of them at once


Last edited by underfire; 4th Oct 2013 at 16:04.
underfire is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2013, 17:34
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's plenty of controlled airspace around the world in which no separation is provided for VFR traffic. US class E is one example.
I'm sure there is. But then commercial air transport flights are not supposed to be operating under VFR, are they? (That's a question...it's been a long time...)

Do they get a separation service from ATC in such airspace?
Capot is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2013, 17:49
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capot
I'm sure there is. But then commercial air transport flights are not supposed to be operating under VFR, are they? (That's a question...it's been a long time...)
That's generally true. My airline (US part 121) has ops specs for VFR operations, but that's more the exception than the rule. But, my point was that there are plenty of places where a commercial air transport flight may be operating under IFR in Class E airspace at the same time as VFR traffic, and no separation is provided by ATC, only separation between other IFR traffic. Under those circumstances, see and avoid is definitely in effect.

Last edited by A Squared; 4th Oct 2013 at 17:50.
A Squared is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2013, 19:35
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Scotland
Age: 79
Posts: 807
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are not Chinese lanterns! Here's a pic for scale.



Just as bad if not worse are those black cigars, solar balloons, which are much more difficult to see and avoid.
broadreach is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2013, 22:58
  #18 (permalink)  

I Have Control
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North-West England
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pathetic. Those silly Brasilians will bring down another of their country's airliners at this rate.
RoyHudd is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2013, 00:24
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Age: 70
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hate to say this but those balloons fly IFR as well as VFR.
Backoffice is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2013, 18:15
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BR
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unmanned balloons are quite common in Brazil due to festivities traditions, specially in the months of June, July and August. Releasing those balloons is a crime as they interfere with ATC and also cause large fires, but there's not much law enforcement for this kind of problem, so people just keep doing that year after year.

And yes, depending on the type and size, those balloons can get as high as 10.000ft.
Lepo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.