Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Orenair B738 at Rostov on Sep 3rd 2013, overran runway on landing

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Orenair B738 at Rostov on Sep 3rd 2013, overran runway on landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2013, 11:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Orenair B738 at Rostov on Sep 3rd 2013, overran runway on landing

Another runway overrun:-

Incident: Orenair B738 at Rostov on Sep 3rd 2013, overran runway on landing

From Aviation Herald:-

An Orenair Boeing 737-800, registration VP-BPY performing flight R2-9558 from Antalya (Turkey) to Rostov (Russia), landed on Rostov's wet runway 22 at 12:55L (08:55Z) but overran the end of the runway and came to a stop with all wheels on soft ground. There are no injuries being reported, the aircraft received no visible damage but needs a good wash. The passengers disembarked through the left hand main door onto soft ground via mobile stairs.

Radar data suggest the aircraft was on final approach at normal landing speeds until descending through about 1800 feet MSL, then the aircraft appeared to be accelerating over ground by about 20 knots until 700 feet MSL landing at a higher than normal speed over ground.
fireflybob is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 16:30
  #2 (permalink)  

DOVE
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Myself
Age: 77
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great weather for a picnic. Just a little wet. And windy from the tail.
Try to fly safely
DOVES is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 17:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 724
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good grief...

This is the SECOND overrun that this poor aircraft has experienced.
See this report on an overrun in 2011 in Nizhny Novgorod with the VP-BPY:

Incident: Orenair B738 at Nizhny Novgorod on Dec 7th 2011, runway excursion on landing
fox niner is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 17:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That airplane is clearly bad luck. They should trade it in for one not as overrun-prone.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 17:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Not lost, but slightly uncertain of position.
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May I suggest a hook and drag-chute retrofit?
F-16GUY is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 20:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: @ a loss
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They should trade it in for one not as overrun-prone.
Anything that's not a B738 should do, they do seem to spend a lot of time in the mud, or worse.
Bus14 is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 20:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 896
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone posted this list of overruns in Rostov on Avherald:

-Donavia B734 Jan 30th 2010
- Rossiya A319 Jun 11th 2011
- Donavia B734 Apr 12th 2011
- UTAir B735 Jul 23rd 2011
- Globus B734 Apr 6th 2012
- Yakutia B738 Dec 1st 2012
- S7 A319 Jan 12th 2013
- Ural A320 Aug 4th 2013
- Orenair B738 Sep 3rd 2013

9 in 3,5 years. 2/3s by 737s. Do 737s represent 66% of operations at that airport? If not, thats worrisome.
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 21:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 625
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If not, thats worrisome.
My I suggest the really worrying bit is that this airport has experienced 9 overruns in 3.5 years and yet, for some mysterious reason, is still open for business?
SMT Member is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2013, 22:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 896
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, you´ve got a point. The Jepps have a notation about runway 22 that the last third is slippery when wet (in addition to being downslope).
Maybe a good idea not to use 22 in tailwinds and rain?
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2013, 00:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Oh come on, don't suggest common sense and Airmanship!!
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2013, 05:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 3.5 from TD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would not be surprised if the runway is never de-rubberized. That stuff is like ice when it gets wet. One of the reasons you should never reach the last third of a runway with too much energy (ie, roll to the end for a convenient turnoff).

Found this pic that gives a pretty good idea of the downward slope and the heavy rubber deposits. There are also no turnoffs from midfield to the end, enticing crews to "keep it rolling".

Photos: - Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net

An airport with so many overruns should really have a close look at what it is doing wrong.

Last edited by Sqwak7700; 5th Sep 2013 at 05:39.
Sqwak7700 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2013, 05:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: SVO
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rwy22 ROV

that's thrue, this particular rwy has a hump just after the treshhold..then it goes downslope all the way.
so basically you'are compelled to overshoot the landing point and then you don't have much runway left anyway (2500 LDA totally)...now just add a poor braking action and you got perfect conditions for a runway overrun.
Charliedontsurf_83 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2013, 20:33
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dark side of the force
Age: 55
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that runway is a pain when wet, really slipery like many others in russia even in Moscow.
transilvana is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2013, 22:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
“slippery when wet”

ICAO Cir 329 Runway Surface Condition Assessment, Measurement and Reporting.

4.64. Additionally a NOTAM “slippery when wet” may be issued whenever a significant portion of a runway drops below the Minimum Friction Level (MFL) as indicated in Table A-1 of Annex 14 or as determined by the state.

6.46. The FAA Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) working on Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment (TALPA) recommends reducing the effective braking action for a wet runway from “good” to “medium” when the runway is designated as slippery when wet.
safetypee is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 16:23
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at the runway photos, it seems obvious that an additional 1000ft of runway overshoot could be built. However the grass portion that is there at present could be sufficiently strong to allow aircraft to taxi.... We don't know how 'muddy' it is.
phiggsbroadband is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 18:44
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dark side of the force
Age: 55
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just watched it this afternoon at 50 mts, we vacated by A taxiway, end of the runway. You can not turn there by means of engine power, real mud, you can see that they were deep stuck.
transilvana is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.