Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Mayday call L Eng / Wing Fire over TUU

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Mayday call L Eng / Wing Fire over TUU

Old 14th Apr 2013, 21:25
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Perth
Age: 55
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mayday call L Eng / Wing Fire over TUU

This evening heard an Mayday call from either RAK 314 or Iraqi 314 Airbus A320 with L ENG fire and wing on fire with 146 Soles on board. Last i heard was an approach at 1500ft into Tabuk. Hope there was a positive outcome to all involved.
Happy Landings to All.
BBJ flying spanner is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2013, 21:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Over Mache Grande?
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAK...

...agree - hope it's a good outcome for all. Having flown a series of charters on behalf of RAK, their call sign was Rak Air, so maybe it isn't RAK?


DW.
dwshimoda is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2013, 22:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,236
Received 84 Likes on 45 Posts
RAK Airways RKM314 flies Cairo to Ras Al-Khaimah 4 times weekly, on Sundays departing 1420 and arriving 2000 (local times).
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2013, 22:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cairo Intl (CAI) - Ras Al Khaimah Intl (RKT) goes very close to Tabuk

Ras Al Khaimah International Airport website shows it as DELAYED, but its now over 6 hours late from original schedule


Photos: Airbus A320-233 Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net

Last edited by 1a sound asleep; 14th Apr 2013 at 22:28.
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 03:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada/Malaysia
Age: 83
Posts: 222
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
UAE flight diverted to Saudi Arabia after onboard emergency - Emirates 24/7

...all safe.
BlankBox is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 05:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 57
Posts: 1,852
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Any news about the fate of this flight ?
atakacs is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 07:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,236
Received 84 Likes on 45 Posts
Any news about the fate of this flight ?
What part of

"The aircraft had an uneventful landing and all passengers and crew are safe"
(see above link)

are you having trouble understanding ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 11:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,676
Likes: 0
Received 54 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by Emirates 24/7
The RT 314 flight made an emergency landing in Saudi Arabian city of Tabuk on Sunday after a passenger suspected fire in the A320 aircraft engine. Quoting airport official, Saudi media said the plane was subjected to examination at the airport but there was no fire or any other damage.
There is always a fire in a working engine! No cabin crew to have a look and confirm/deny?
Checkboard is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 11:28
  #9 (permalink)  
dkz
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard all parameters ok, no Ecam and no pilot checking visually. Decision based on a pax opinion relayed by the cc to the pic ...
dkz is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 11:30
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
OK... Now the passengers can detect a fire.

What the pilots didn't think to check their own warning systems in the cockpit, didn't ask a F/A to double check this passenger's claim or best of all not one of the pilots decided to go back there and talk to the passenger or to see for himself if there was a problem?
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 11:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 1 Post
Bit like the indian 737 that evacuated when an F/A mistook the reflection of the beacon on the engine at night as a fire. Mistakes do happen.

It is easy with hindsight to pour scorn on others. But two crew in the cockpit and the cabin crew tell you the plane is on fire, would you immediately send your copilot to have a look? With no indication of fire I am sure you would ask the cabin to double check. But if the plane really is on fire as we all know you have little time to get it down. Sending your co-pilot for a walk round the cabin would definitely slow things down in such a situation.

This was not an ideal outcome but much better than the other way around.
lederhosen is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 12:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Burrow, N53:48:02 W1:48:57, The Tin Tent - EGBS, EGBO
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last night I went to bed praying for a good outcome instead of what, from the first post, seemed almost inevitable; I am delighted that all are safe. The tea-and-biccies with the boss may turn out to be a no tea and no biccies event but I hope not. I would far sooner be delayed by a diversion for safety reasons than be donning my wings harp and halo outfit.
DX Wombat is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 13:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Spain
Age: 81
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK... Now the passengers can detect a fire.
Interesting to speculate how many lives might have been saved in previous accidents, had any of the passengers had the courage to voice their observations.
Sunnyjohn is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 13:44
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting to speculate how many lives might have been saved in previous accidents, had any of the passengers had the courage to voice their observations
My wife has saved our life hundreds of tmes with her screaming about my driving.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 13:54
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No I'm not saying you should disregard a passenger's concern but...

If all my engine parameters are normal, if all my bleeds are normal if the aircraft's engine respond normally and the aircraft itself feels normal and if I have no fire warnings going off in the cockpit I would certainly not shut down or declare an emergency just because a passenger said he saw a fire.

An aircraft doesn't fall out of the sky because of an engine fire. In the above circumstance I would certainly delegate a crew member preferably the other pilot to have a look at this passengerís concern.

Just like wing icing/contamination, if a passenger or another crew member felt concerned about possible contamination on the wings prior to takeoff then having a crew member take a look and address this passenger's concern would be totally normal.

Last edited by Jet Jockey A4; 15th Apr 2013 at 14:51.
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 13:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: next to a beautiful lake
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....as did the passenger screaming that the flaps got forgotten at take-off in a small Dutch Fokker F70....

In a time where everyone can read how to change oil filters and brake linings on a car, such things happen and the knowledge gap between the professionals and the sciolists gets smaller and smaller. In many cases quite right so, in many cases not so right. Sometimes hard to distinguish however.
HeadingSouth is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 13:57
  #17 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 81
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting to speculate how many lives might have been saved in previous accidents, had any of the passengers had the courage to voice their observations.
Probably quite a few at Kegworth.
green granite is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 14:06
  #18 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gg - I think I recall some pax (and c/crew) did, but I think it was said the c/crew were 'reluctant' to pass this to the pilots?
BOAC is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 15:34
  #19 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 81
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that is about right, BOAC, the point being that the SLF had seen which engine it was and had that info got to the crew it might have made them have another look at which engine they thought was u/s. My post was really just a reminder to the self righteous on here, but no-one in particular.

Last edited by green granite; 15th Apr 2013 at 15:38.
green granite is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2013, 16:16
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Interesting to speculate how many lives might have been saved in previous accidents, had any of the passengers had the courage to voice their observations.
How often does a passenger report an issue to such an extent that it reaches the captain?
I've had three cases, two as a passenger and one as a ground observer (filming)

I reported what I thought to be fuel leaking, observed from the ground at sunrise, message was relayed to the pilot via Gatwick Tower, turned out to be icing fluid, backlit and forming a visible trail from the tail against the clear morning sky

I reported a near miss with two (blurred) objects, which I assumed were very large birds, on approach to Canne. Spoke to pilot on landing and he considered that it could have also been an object being ejected from an engine, saying it was not unusual for paint to flake and he would have a look.

But I "bottled out" of calling a steward on a 777 transatlantic flight, landing at Gatwick, when I suspected that the flaps motor had not turned off.
Sitting adjacent the wing I could clearly hear the whirr of the flaps motor and observed the flaps deploy, but the motor did not cycle off.

Sure enough at low level, the pilot decided to go-around, as presumably he was not sure the flaps were fully deployed.

If there is a next time, I won't be so shy.

Mickjoebill
mickjoebill is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.