Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

FAA Grounds 787s

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

FAA Grounds 787s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th January 2013 | 18:51
  #521 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: EDDF
So B was aware about battery issues and didn´t communicate this status to FAA since grounding? This is a major topic in finding answers to the system failures. I can´t belive that this comes on top by an insider.

If 150 bat are deep discharged, then the power has gone somewhere. Internal short would destroy the bat and we´d had seen much more incidents and early grounding. So for me it is the surrounding system which is sucking at the bat.
Taunusflyer is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2013 | 18:57
  #522 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: EDDF
from hetfield´s link in #523: "We feel good about the battery technology and its fit for the airplane"

after 150 dead bats...
Taunusflyer is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2013 | 19:00
  #523 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: Choroni, sometimes
Völlige Ignoranz, sorry.
hetfield is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2013 | 19:37
  #524 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
It is not necessarily as bad as it may seem. Boeing could have been reporting, and the FAA monitoring.
I suspect that to be the case.

If these batteries were being flagged up by the system as 'below minimum voltage/discharged' and simply being swapped out for new units under warranty, the regulator may have seen the problem largely as an economic one for Boeing.

I agree with you though, that such a failure rate should have set alarm bells ringing at both the FAA and Boeing.

BOEING should have ask themselves:

"What's wrong with the batteries?"
I'm sure they did and I'm sure there were some 'interesting' phone calls between Boeing and Yuasa where Yuasa were telling Boeing's engineers to look at their charging/monitoring systems and installation.
Speed of Sound is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 01:05
  #525 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Uk
Please dont laugh at me ... this has been nagging me for the last two days



Maybe not affecting the charging circuits but all that lithium, especially in a composite aircraft
MkSi is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 06:34
  #526 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: UK
how many flight cycles have these aircraft done (in peoples opinion) before battery swap? if it is , as mentioned above , 2 or 3 per year - that's really quite low to be swapping batteries!

Last edited by HalloweenJack; 31st January 2013 at 06:35.
HalloweenJack is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 06:36
  #527 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: England
At 16K each it must be tempting to try and recycle the batteries that have reached the low voltage cut off?

They aren't talking about 787 batteries but..

How to Awaken Sleeping Li-ion - Battery University

Some battery chargers and analyzers, including those made by Cadex, feature a wake-up feature or “boost” to reactivate and charge batteries that have fallen asleep."

snip

Do not boot lithium-based batteries back to life that have dwelled below 1.5V/cell for a week or longer. Copper shunts may have formed inside the cells that can lead to a partial or total electrical short. When recharging, such a cell might become unstable, causing excessive heat or showing other anomalies.

snip

A study done by Cadex to examine failed batteries reveals that three out of ten batteries are removed from service due to over-discharge. Furthermore, 90 percent of returned batteries have no fault or can easily be serviced. Lack of test devices at the customer service level is in part to blame for the high exchange rate. Refurbishing batteries saves money and protects the environment.

Last edited by cwatters; 31st January 2013 at 06:46.
cwatters is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 07:06
  #528 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: Near sheep!
So to compare the 78 with the 77, why the need for these batteries in place of the equivalent as used on say the 77?
I am guessing it has an apu and a rat?

I am a little confused.
WindSheer is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 07:15
  #529 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: F370
Pressurization for one. When you have electric supply of air, you don't want to run out at the first hiccup in power supply. The design/certification requires a lot of power, including in the backup system.
AtoBsafely is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 08:04
  #530 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,182
Likes: 1,116
From: UK
The batteries do not supply power to the Cabin Air Compressors.
Emergency Brakes in the event of a complete electrical failure is the only extra heavy user that the battery is needed for compared to the 777.
I think....
TURIN is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 08:11
  #531 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: F370
OK. Thanks
AtoBsafely is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 08:43
  #532 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 694
Likes: 1
From: US/EU
Inherently unsafe. -Elon Musk, SpaceX, Tesla

Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX and owner of electric car maker Tesla, who should know something about working with these types of batteries, has this to say about a fundamental flaw in Boeing's battery design:

Elon Musk: Boeing 787 battery fundamentally unsafe
Mark in CA is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 08:55
  #533 (permalink)  
10 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 1
From: Australia
Aus: No batteries at all in the hold

Chuck Norris:

The Australian Civil Aviation Authority recently promulgated a rule banning all batteries, of ANY capacity and ANY chemistry, including Primary (non-rechargeable) batteries from hold baggage.

All batteries must be in carry-on luggage, either in their device or packed in an insulating container (paper envelope will do).

So in Australia, the answer is "Everyone's airline has banned them."

Cheers
JohnMcGhie is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 09:18
  #534 (permalink)  
10 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 1
From: Australia
Ferrying a Lithium Battery

If a Lithium battery has never been charged, and is not connected to anything, it would be perfectly safe to transport it.

If it HAS been charged, then it becomes a problem. You can't empty it: a Lithium Cobalt battery will not recover from dead flat.

You could pack it in such a manner and such a place that you could ensure that it is disconnected and never gets hotter than 50 degrees Celsius, which would "lessen" the risk that it might spontaneously catch fire, but would not remove the possibility entirely.

I suspect the replacements will have to travel by sea (as deck cargo) or rail (but not through any tunnels...)

Cheers
JohnMcGhie is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 09:53
  #535 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 8,208
Likes: 351
From: London UK
From BBC news
"....Boeing has backed the battery used in the Dreamliner after Japan Airlines and All Nippon Airways said they changed a number of them in the past few months.........Boeing said while the replacement rate was "slightly higher" than usual, the changes were "routine maintenance" ......

On Wednesday, All Nippon Airways said it replaced batteries 10 times over the past few months, while Japan Airlines said it did so in a "few cases" over the past few months. Boeing said that it was carrying out an investigation to find out what caused the battery malfunctions.

.....said Mr McNerney, chief executive of Boeing.
"We feel good about the battery technology and it's fit for the aeroplane"..... "
BBC News - Dreamliner: Boeing defends 787 batteries

I wonder why "routine maintenance" has led to "an investigation". And if McNerney and the management team "feel good" about the battery arrangement, I wonder how the Boeing stockholders feel about the management team.
WHBM is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 10:16
  #536 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Cork, Ireland
From BBC news Quote:
"....Boeing has backed the battery used in the Dreamliner after Japan Airlines and All Nippon Airways said they changed a number of them in the past few months.........Boeing said while the replacement rate was "slightly higher" than usual, the changes were "routine maintenance" ......

On Wednesday, All Nippon Airways said it replaced batteries 10 times over the past few months, while Japan Airlines said it did so in a "few cases" over the past few months. Boeing said that it was carrying out an investigation to find out what caused the battery malfunctions.

.....said Mr McNerney, chief executive of Boeing.
"We feel good about the battery technology and it's fit for the aeroplane"..... "
BBC News - Dreamliner: Boeing defends 787 batteries

I wonder why "routine maintenance" has led to "an investigation". And if McNerney and the management team "feel good" about the battery arrangement, I wonder how the Boeing stockholders feel about the management team.
The BBC headline is misleading. What McNerney has done is defend the choice of battery technology, not the batteries themselves. I think it is looking clear that Boeing needs a battery redesign and McNerney must know this already. In fact with dozens of battery replacements across the fleet, he should have known this for many months now. If Boeing management have done their job right, there should be a new battery already in the works. If...
glenbrook is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 10:30
  #537 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 45
From: Edinburgh
Tricky detective work

Just to illustrate the sort of thing that can go wrong (this is NOT a suggestion of what has actually gone wrong), just suppose that the temperature data was output fom the batteries in deg F, when it should have been output in deg C, and suppose that 10 deg C was the minimum operating temperature.

Then the temperature control would be happy to keep the battery above 10 deg F, equal to minus 12 deg C, and the data logged would "prove" that the temperature never went below the limit of 10 degrees.

Of course it will not turn out to be anything that simple, but it is an example of how the cause of a problem can sometimes hide the evidence.
DType is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 12:02
  #538 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Ireland
When people are talking about 'defective' batteries and 'new technology', can we remember that the units installed on the 787 are made up of 8 x LVP65 cells which have been used successfully in various applications for nearly 10 years now.

What is 'new' is the installation and the charging/monitoring system that it is hooked up to as well as the loads it is expected to carry.

I'm sure that the solution to Boeing's problems will lie in the systems hooked up to the batteries, not the batteries themselves.
Speed of Sound is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 12:13
  #539 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,118
Likes: 140
From: overthere
SOS may well be onto something. If they just ditch the aeroplane bit of the setup the Batteries should work fine. Could save some money in production costs as well.
donpizmeov is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2013 | 12:19
  #540 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: Choroni, sometimes
@SoS

I fully agree...
hetfield is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.