Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

EUROPE quo vadis

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

EUROPE quo vadis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Dec 2012, 20:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: behind the moon
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EUROPE quo vadis

What is going on in Europe?! SAS, Air Berlin,Cargolux, SN Brussels, Iberia and even the big ones like Lufthansa and AF/KLMare strugeling or are close to bankruptcy. Something is very wrong in the old continent….Or is the globalized world ill as such? Who are the competitors to this well established and more or less “union friendly” airlines? The Middle East comes to mind. Airlines like EK, EY or QR?? This carriers are subsidized by their states and their aim is to get market shares for whatever it will cost and money is not an issue here. They are subsidized and don’t have to care about how to make money and they also don´t have to worry about labor law and/or human rights. It´s modern slavery for the ones who decided to work there or just had no other choice in order to feed their families. So the question is: Is the European government watching their own industry going down the drain or will they establish some mechanism to protect their own economy like reducing slots for certain airlines which are subsidized by their state of registry??



Hellas!! Europe quo vadis?

Last edited by HURZ; 5th Dec 2012 at 20:26.
HURZ is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2012, 21:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: England
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Discussed at length in this 27 page (up to now) interesting thread.

http://www.pprune.org/dg-p-reporting...t-banking.html

And it ain't just the aviation industry either.

Lid
flying lid is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 09:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recently had to travel on buisiness from Germany to China.

Price of Business Class ticket Lufthansa: 4,100.-€
Price of Business Class ticket Ethiad: 2,200.-€

Questions?
Pika is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 09:54
  #4 (permalink)  

A Runyonesque Character
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The South of France ... Not
Age: 74
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Amongst the Brussels policy-making community, there is a – shall we say – significant minority who hold the belief that Europe’s air travel needs can be catered for by the LoCos on short haul and non-European hub carriers for long haul.

This is not yet mainstream thinking in the corridors of power but it does influence decision-making.
The SSK is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 11:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there are 50 countries in Europe containing circa 250mm people

historically at least half have had a significant international airline- this provided decent services for a lot of people at the other end of the line in what used to be the 3rd or second world. Because they were seen as "national champions" there was (and still is) a great reluctance to allow mergers or takeovers

Once the guys at the other end of the line started their own decent airlines (probably starting with SQ) the competition has become serious. The new airlines aren't lumbered with historic, First world cost bases nor work practices.

Because of the high costs the LCA's have started up in the legacy airlines back yard and run rings round them as people will always choose on cost if they are paying themselves

In the States airlines have been allowed to merge and go into Chapter 11 and they are protected by the Govt but even they have been in pain for a couple of decade

Probably only 3-4 of the main European airlines have a hope of long term survival- BA , LH, KLM/AF would be my guess
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 13:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because of the high costs the LCA's have started up in the legacy airlines back yard and run rings round them as people will always choose on cost if they are paying themselves
My bold.

Taking myself as an example I would dispute "always". For me it's a balance between cost, convenience and service product. I have never (and never will) fly Ryanair for instance no matter how cheap they might be.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 14:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had a trip to AMS not so long ago and it was a choice of a loco or a legacy carrier, the legacy was much cheaper more comfortable and much better service. No hassle with check in baggage, could take sports equipment free, allocated seat and a snack and drink at no extra cost. Shop around Locos are not always the cheapest.
Best foot forward is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2012, 14:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree that they are the least likely airline I would choose to book on but sometimes they go places no one else does

The history of the airline business over the last 25 years is littered with failures who thought that people would choose quality over price - it's very, very sad

Ryanair is capable of driving any airline off a route - its not some cunning plan or devious politics - they just charge less than the other guy
Heathrow Harry is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.