Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

DAL494 JFK No ASI

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

DAL494 JFK No ASI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Nov 2012, 19:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: US
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DAL494 JFK No ASI

Excerpted from AvHerald:

A Delta Airlines Boeing 737-800, registration N3766 performing flight DL-494 from Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) to New York JFK,NY (USA) with 126 people on board, was on approach to JFK's runway 31R descending to 9000 feet when the crew reported they had unreliable airspeed indications and consequently automatic engine control/automation problems stating they basically had no airspeed indicator, ATC re-assigned runway 31L for a visual approach in response. After the aircraft levelled at 4000 feet the crew requested immediate lower stating they had no instruments in the cloud, ATC cleared the aircraft down to 2000 feet, once in the clear the crew advised they had instrument and automation problems but if remaining visual did not need any assistance.
Ted927 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2012, 19:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 625
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lessons learned will, I hope, be passed on to Air France ....
SMT Member is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2012, 20:16
  #3 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,143
Received 224 Likes on 66 Posts
NO instruments? So, the Captain's, FO's and standby all failed?
Herod is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2012, 20:36
  #4 (permalink)  

I Have Control
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North-West England
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Idiotic post from SMT member. No further comment needed.
RoyHudd is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2012, 21:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A sign of the times, AA 1048, a B-757 immediately had to declare 'min fuel' after DL 494 was given emergency priority.

As the Deltoid said after his requested descent to 3000 feet was delayed for the AA traffic passing below:

'We're out of the clouds now, I can see, it's fine. I didn't have any instruments in the clouds, it's OK now.'

Sounded like just another day at the office for the good old boys at Delta.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 01:53
  #6 (permalink)  
Person Of Interest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roy,

I agree with you...but what's an SMT? I've never heard that term before...
DownIn3Green is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 02:10
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Zone of Alienation
Age: 79
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'The autothrottle disconnected! We need lower!.......Ok, we're good now, I can see our airspeed visually.'

Last edited by FIRESYSOK; 30th Nov 2012 at 02:16.
FIRESYSOK is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 02:43
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: E.Wash State
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but what's an SMT?
That would be poster #2!
obgraham is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 06:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With what we know they did the right thing. Strange that all airspeeds including standby were lost.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 07:46
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about IRS indicated Ground Speed (P5 overhead) plus wind correction (if needed), all NGs have got that!

Even shown on the ND!

EW73

Last edited by EW73; 30th Nov 2012 at 07:47.
EW73 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 07:52
  #11 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once again the PPRune wild goose chase is off, based on insufficient information

AvHerald will only have 'hearsay' in this case until/unless the NTSB produce a report. As presented it makes little sense.
BOAC is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 15:14
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My question: If all instruments were lost, how did they know they were @4000, and how did they know when they arrived @2000??

Or am I just being too pesky?
barit1 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 15:24
  #13 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They obviously used the TLAR system fitted to the NG.
BOAC is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 17:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that the That Looks About Right system?
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 18:05
  #15 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well done A good system.
BOAC is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 18:46
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Spain
Age: 82
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what's an SMT? I've never heard that term before..
I found 69.
The most appropriate seems to be:
Simultaneous Multi Threading
Sunnyjohn is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2012, 21:35
  #17 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CEFGW not applicable in this case. Purely commercial.
BOAC is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2012, 04:44
  #18 (permalink)  
Person Of Interest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, All kidding aside...admittedly my aircraft were non-glass, except for the 737-400, and as the Captain I can't imagine that a loss of "all" primary instruments would affect the successful outcome of the flight...

Specifically, as Captain, I flew many (many) hours in the back and right seat before I gained the privledge of the Left Seat. During this time I learned which power settings were required during any specific realm of flight...

The wind noise outside the windows, the feeling of the aircraft, the flap settings, etc ad nausem...The Captain should look at an inop A/S indicator as just another bump in the road...

I'm ready for the flack, but I'm sure guys like BOAC and Barit will agree...even though it's a large transport A/C...the principles are the same when you learned to fly in a Cessna or Piper...(do they still do that?)
DownIn3Green is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2012, 22:00
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DownIn3Green:
The wind noise outside the windows, the feeling of the aircraft, the flap settings, etc ad nausem...The Captain should look at an inop A/S indicator as just another bump in the road...
My father instructed in AT-6 Texans/Harvards 70 years ago. He told me about a portion of the curriculum in which part of the student's ASI was masked, so that the trainee gained exactly the above skills. He considered it a valuable tool in his arsenal of skills.
barit1 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2012, 21:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Confusio Helvetica
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best part is they still have to deal with Kennedy ground.
'Vehicle calling Ground'
'Delta 494-'
'I said VE-HIC-LE'

Last edited by DingerX; 6th Dec 2012 at 08:05.
DingerX is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.