Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Drunk swedish pilot freed by court

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Drunk swedish pilot freed by court

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Oct 2012, 15:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milano
Age: 53
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In don't wish this guy to be unemployed or even not flying anymore.
Then you are clearly contradicting yourself, i.e. you don't want him to lose his job but on the other hand you would have preferred to see him served with a criminal conviction that would make him automatically lose his job and his license. You just can't have both, you have to pick one.
Dg800 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2012, 12:50
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GC Paradise
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
The case does raise an interesting point.

If you are walking out of a bar in an intoxicated state in the general direction of the car park, AND you have your car keys in your pocket...can you be found guilty of exercising the privileges of your car driving licence whilst in an intoxicated state?
FlexibleResponse is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2012, 13:37
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 40
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlexibleResponse
The case does raise an interesting point.

If you are walking out of a bar in an intoxicated state in the general direction of the car park, AND you have your car keys in your pocket...can you be found guilty of exercising the privileges of your car driving licence whilst in an intoxicated state?
Well in the UK if you then climb into the back seat of your car and fall asleep when drunk then you can be found guilty (a lawyer found that out the hard way a few years ago I believe) no matter how much you protest that you weren't going to drive it...

The words in the UK are "in charge of a motor vehicle". That could just mean "in the vicinity of". Essentially you have to prove you had no intention of driving it for the court to consider a defence. Always difficult to prove that you weren't going to do something...
riverrock83 is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 00:21
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A few years back a US crew had pushed back, but were recalled to the gate for a breath test based on concerns raised by the security screeners. Both blew over limit.

At trial, the defense was that since the tug had not disconnected, technically it was the tug driver and not them operating the airplane.

Nice try.

At least one of them spent several years as a guest of the state.

Last edited by BobnSpike; 3rd Nov 2012 at 00:23.
BobnSpike is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 01:59
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a bit of a piss-take no ? he showed for work, signed in somewhere I guess (electronically or with a BIC) used (I assume) his ID rather than a boarding pass to go to the aircraft . . . .and then ? he was going to buy a ticket online & jump in the back ?/he was a closet plane-spotter ? / or he was going to be a member of the crew on the thing ?

Really truly, being a product of a much more forgiving era, I sympathise. . but FFS, he was "goin flyin", so, in this sh1tty politically correct era, if he has kept his pension, he should count himself lucky IMHO.

"Excuse me Sir, how did you gain access to this area,and what are your intentions here ?" Duh ! ! Julian Assange has maybe not so much to fear if this is how Swedish Justice works
captplaystation is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 07:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely prevention is better! on the Japanese rail system Train drivers have to blow into a breath test machine when signing in for duty first thing.

It would be an easy thing to do the same for pilots going through security airside. Items jackets belts etc through the scanning machine blow into the breath test equipment? Job done no more drunk pilots.

We have to be checked for weapons or anything we may take airside which could threaten the safety of aircraft why not alcohol?

Last edited by Pace; 3rd Nov 2012 at 09:10.
Pace is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 17:47
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sandpit
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strange story, why would the police check him during the preflight check? I mean this guy not just had some left over alcohol, this guy was stone drunk with a BAC of 0.96. Why did this guy even show up for work, what about his fellow crew members, why did they not tell him to book off before the flight?

Now about the car laws. In the US you can sleep in the car drunk as long as the key is not in the ignition. Charging a guy because he is asleep in the back seat is ridiculous.
FlyingCroc is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 18:56
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlyingCroc
this guy was stone drunk with a BAC of 0.96.
Well, stone drunk, he was slightly over the driving limit in the USA.
He might not have shown any evident sign of it.
flydive1 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2012, 10:11
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milano
Age: 53
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strange story, why would the police check him during the preflight check?
As mentioned in the original article, he had not begun anything. As a matter of fact, he only stepped out of the plane because the police, who was evidently conducting random preventative checks, told him to.

To those saying that the Swedish justice system was wrong in not convicting him, do you also advocate people being convicted just for being members of a particular political party (let's say the German NPD, f.e.)?
Dg800 is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2012, 11:17
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the boot of my car!
Posts: 5,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Point taken! Hence prevention is a better option. A simple breath test machine at security would stop pilots knowingly boarding a flight while intoxicated or unknowingly doing the same from drinks the night before.
Maybe the Japanese railway system have it right expecting a breath test before hundreds of lives are put into your hands?

Pace
Pace is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2012, 12:56
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milano
Age: 53
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could not concur more, although I think blanket checks will be difficult to implement worldwide, ICAO notwithstanding. Hell, we cannot even agree on some sort of common rules of the air system! Implementation as part of a company's policy will also be difficult, as the public often has the childish view that if all pilots get checked, then that must be because they're all drunkards. See the childish posts in the thread about the Ukrainian (dead) pilots testing positive for alcohol (post mortem, obviously) for confirmation. Any company implementing such a policy risks a serious negative publicity backlash, when all they're doing is actually increasing the safety of their passengers compared to a company that performs no checks and just waits for the local police to perform them randomly (and most likely, not often enough for cost reasons).
Dg800 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.