Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Sky Airlines Chile 737 near miss on landing

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Sky Airlines Chile 737 near miss on landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jul 2012, 09:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sky Airlines Chile 737 near miss on landing

Not sure if this has been posted before, Sky 737 nearly crashed on landing in Chile

Choque de ala derecha con la pista de aterrizaje vuelo sky 101 en la serena el 18 de julio de 2012 - YouTube

News in Spanish with pictures of damaged wing after go around


Last edited by Thunderbirdsix; 25th Jul 2012 at 09:41.
Thunderbirdsix is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 10:23
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I no speaka da Spanish, but contrary to the 'simulation' it looks as if they landed across the runway rather than along it!
BOAC is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 10:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: in a hotspot on that planet
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what a short runway....
but for sure wide....
flaphandlemover is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 10:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milano
Age: 53
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I no speaka da Spanish, but contrary to the 'simulation' it looks as if they landed across the runway rather than along it!
Pilot claims he lost sight of the runway because of sunlight and a light mist that was forming. He basically claims that sunlight was diffused/reflected in a way that made it impossible to see out of the cockpit. The rest is the usual crap with passengers who are of course all qualified accident investigators blaming the pilot and asking for financial compensation and the airline refusing any payout as they claim "natural causes" and that nothing was wrong with the plane or the crew. This is the gist of it.

The simulation definitely is way off, from the passenger video it's quite clear that they touched down way off to the left, possibly so far off that they might not have had all wheels on the tarmac.
Dg800 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 12:47
  #5 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,148
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
The short graphic simulation was probably done by the TV company and they needed to err on the safe side, despite the video evidence. I doubt the carrier could have been together enough to try and get that together so fast.

As I have said before, every carrier's CEO and every Captain MUST assume that at least one video recorder is running at ALL times. It is the pax video that will carry public opinion and will be used alongside the data recorders to apportion blame. Pax will continue to ignore instructions not to use video/camcorders/phones, it is a simple fact of life.

If the carrier had any sense - the moment they saw that video - they would have started negotiating as it's Game Over. They won't.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 15:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also on the ground:
Mauersegler is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 17:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
The full video (via link) in the first post says it all. Circle-to-land with final heading into the fringes of a marine layer and the setting sun. Note how fast the weather turns to solid OVC during the climb-out.

SCSE (like most of Chile) has mountains to the east, which may explain why the pilot turned in fairly tightly. Also high terrain to the south, which explains a right-hand turn, putting the CA on the high side with the worst visual references.

No ILS. VOR approaches only for the reciprocal runway (due to the high terrain to the east). A slightly "tabletop" airport, so the RA callouts will be skewed and rapid in the last mile. Nearby terrain. A certain amount of pucker-factor for a 737, even without the sun and clouds.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2012, 22:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Zealand
Age: 67
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh boy, it looks a close thing in the second vid.
WanganuiLad is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 00:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Well, that's one way to add winglets to an older 737.

Actually, I revise my previous analysis slightly. Not a circle-to-land, but a long "final" down a side valley, with a 60° turn for alignment 1/2 mile off the end of the runway.

Kinda like the LDA approach into KDCA 19 - except with low sun, fog, mountains - and no radio guidance.

http://www.altairva-fs.com/training/.../DCA_LDA19.gif
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 07:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Any chance it was caused by control servo interference by the passenger disregarding the safety briefing by having an electronic device (hence the video, perhaps in a phone) switched on during the landing ?
peterperfect is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 08:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bradford
Age: 54
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it was interference it will the first time - about as likely in real life as a mobile phone causing an explosion in a petrol station...

Am I missing something - why would passengers get compensation? Surely Alton Towers could charge for excitement like that - but no harm done (to the Px).
charliemouse is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 08:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
...and why would the pilot say he'd lost sight of the runway in the mist....if he'd had a nice excuse of radio interference to fall back on...?
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 09:44
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...another case of pilots behind the wheel with marginal hand-flying skills.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 10:09
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Between Nippi and Pasro
Age: 46
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No bad weather, no windshear, a kind of visual approach with long final and a B737-200 that can be flown like a small cessna!
It sounds very strange, where is the error? Too much confidence with the aircraft or lack of skills???
Strangely they diverted to another airport far away without trying to land again in La Serena, why? There is something missing...
claser111 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 12:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strangely they diverted to another airport far away without trying to land again in La Serena, why? There is something missing...
That's something I was thinking too, well, they could have also needed to inspect the landing area for debris... Or it was the cloud cover closing in? Or simply the pilot considered the low sun as too risky? Any other reason not to try again? And then maybe some would hate me for asking, but how long does it take to fly the distance? And how long do the CVR and DFR in an old 737-200 record before overwriting?

Last edited by Mauersegler; 26th Jul 2012 at 12:34. Reason: including low sun as reason
Mauersegler is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 13:24
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hades.
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strangely they diverted to another airport far away without trying to land again in La Serena, why? There is something missing...
Er, hello. Did you bother to read the other posts

with final heading into the fringes of a marine layer and the setting sun
No ILS. VOR approaches only for the reciprocal runway
and

another case of pilots behind the wheel with marginal hand-flying skills
Case solved then
helen-damnation is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 16:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
with ... a B737-200 that can be flown like a small cessna!
Yep. Definitely. Did my first solo in a 732!

Strangely they diverted to another airport far away without trying to land again in La Serena, why?
Because the pilot had pushed the envelope about as far as he could without resulting in body bags, and decided another attempt was not a smart idea. His best decision of the day. (Shades of Cork.)
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2012, 18:59
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they might not have had all wheels on the tarmac
FYI, pilots call it a runway. Or a ramp (though obviously not in this case).
stepwilk is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2012, 12:56
  #19 (permalink)  
MPH
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Both sides of 40W
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You see éstos´RayBan´are not good. I should have bought those Serengetti!!!
MPH is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2012, 19:53
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,832
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stepwilk
FYI, pilots call it a runway
F Y I...

English pilots will call it TARMAC And the French call it the PISTE B T W

Last edited by White Knight; 27th Jul 2012 at 19:53.
White Knight is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.