Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Jetliner Flies Directly Over White House

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Jetliner Flies Directly Over White House

Old 2nd Apr 2002, 17:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face Jetliner Flies Directly Over White House

A Denver-bound Frontier Airlines passenger jet flew through the restricted airspace above the White House last night.

The pilot of Flight 819, a Boeing 737, was immediately contacted by air traffic controllers and he acknowledged making an error.

The plane took off from Reagan National Airport at 6:15 p.m. EST and landed at Denver International Airport.

It was monitored after entering the restricted airspace, but no other measures were taken. The airspace above Washington is still being patrolled by fighter planes.

The standard departure route for planes flying out of Reagan National includes a sharp turn just after takeoff, to avoid the restricted airspace.

"The pilot missed the first turning point," Brown said. "He did manage to go through part of the restricted airspace."

I guess the security isn't that good as they tell us ! :o

Source Aviation news
avt100 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2002, 18:21
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pardon me but I would consider it quite worthy of this board
BigJETS is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2002, 18:55
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool Well, for starters...

If they had missed that first turn and then happened to go Lost Comm (missing the radio call) and somebody had an itchy finger (and if Pluto was aligned with Uranus) they could've been SHOT DOWN!

And since Murphy's Law is alive and well I'm sure the falling wreckage of the innocent airliner would've descended upon the White House.

Such lack of attention to detail in these days is fairly newsworthy to me--it's a good thing the pilot didn't miss that radio call.
zerozero is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2002, 19:48
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN,USA.
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Actually its stunning! Following 9/11,DCA was shutdown forever while the Feds worked out how to get civil aviation in and out of Reagan, without endangering sensitive areas in the DC area. With all the debate and the press coverage that has surrounded DCA here in the USA, well frankly I'm Gobsmacked that so soon after re-opening the place we've had a whoopsie.
tinyrice is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2002, 19:57
  #5 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 50
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm... I wonder did it in fact fly over the WH or just infringe the restricted zone? I suspect the headline was more for drumming up interest. I suspect a serious view would be taken of flying directly overhead GWB's place at any time, never mind post 9-11?
MarkD is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2002, 20:13
  #6 (permalink)  
Join Date: May 2000
Location: US
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is called Prohibited Area

This is not a Restricted Area. It is a Prohibited Area. The Flight Deck Crew will most likely face review by the FAA. If smart they will immediately submit ASRS Forms to obtain immunity from any adverse action by the FAA.
Check 6 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2002, 20:29
  #7 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they departed RWY 36, which is likely, then approx. 40 secs after lift off with out the left turn up the river, they would be overhead the White House. Almost a straight line accross the tidal basin and mall. Bingo.

Same true on approach for RWY 18. Over Georgetown at 2000, 142 degress down the river, quick left turn, and 20 secs. overhead the White House.

Don't see how overhead security is effective assistance.

Last edited by wes_wall; 2nd Apr 2002 at 20:54.
wes_wall is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2002, 01:57
  #8 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: us
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no real biggie. the restricted (prohibited) area extends a mile or more south of the White House itself, and it seems they just intruded a bit on the southern edge. did not fly over the White House itself.
Plane strays into White House airspace
From Patty Davis and Kathleen Koch

WASHINGTON (CNN) --A Frontier Airlines jet flew into restricted airspace near the White House as it took off Monday evening from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, according to the Federal Aviation Administration.

Frontier Flight 819, a Boeing 737-300, took off to the north from the Reagan airport and -- instead of turning to the left as required -- continued straight and into restricted airspace, said FAA spokesman Bill Shumann.

The jet was just inside restricted airspace, he said, within two miles of the White House.

Shumann said the FAA will investigate and considers the matter a case of possible "pilot deviation," which the agency defines as "an action of a pilot that violates any federal aviation regulation."

The spokesman said there could be disciplinary action against the pilot in the form of a reprimand or license revocation.

Frontier Airlines is a low-cost airline based in Denver, Colorado.

According to the FAA, this marks the fourth time since September 11 that a commercial aircraft has flown into prohibited airspace over Washington:

On December 22, a commercial aircraft strayed into the restricted airspace.

On January 4, an American Airlines flight taking off from Reagan National made an error similar to that of the Frontier aircraft, continuing straight instead of turning.

On March 8, a U.S. Airways aircraft landing at Reagan National Airport didn't comply promptly with instructions from air traffic controllers and entered the off-limits airspace at 9,000 feet.

On March 21, a Medivac helicopter departing Children's Hospital flew for unknown reasons through the northern edge of prohibited airspace.

The agency said in January that pilots -- 95 percent of them in small planes -- have flown into restricted or prohibited airspace at least 270 times since the terror attacks.

The incidents include 10 times when pilots flew over President Bush's Crawford, Texas, ranch and 45 times when pilots flew close to the presidential retreat at Camp David, Maryland.

Other planes flew too close to cities, outdoor sporting events and nuclear power plants, the FAA said.

Violations of the prohibited airspace over Washington were a headache for aviation safety officials even before the terrorist attacks.

There were 13 violations in 1996, 27 in 1997, 43 in 1998, 16 in 1999, 25 in 2000 and 26 in the first three quarters of 2001.

The number of incursions dropped in 1999 after the FAA launched an education campaign and issued new warnings to pilots.

In recent years, roughly one-quarter of those flying into the off-limits airspace over Washington were commercial air carriers. The remainder of violators were small, general aviation aircraft.
SaturnV is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2002, 02:44
  #9 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well I certainly do not wish that the pilot be met with discipline. That would be a shame.
BigJETS is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2002, 03:06
  #10 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alignment of Planets

If you fly into Prohibited Airspace...especially in Washington you could expect more than Pluto to be aligned with Uranus. Infact you might expect Uranus to be sitting in the right hand seat next trip.
Traffic is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2002, 14:49
  #11 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SaturnV, CNN aired a video tape of a reporter preparing for his news report, standing in front of the White House. You could clearly hear the jet passing overhead, and the reporter responding with supprise, that the airplane should not be flying over the White House. Me thinks he messed with the pooch big time.
wes_wall is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2002, 15:07
  #12 (permalink)  
Wherefore Art I?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Near the pointy end... But not TOO near...
Age: 55
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I saw the same video tape, and watching the reporters eyes, you can see where he's looking. It's pretty much directly over the White House.

Supposedly the pilots were in contact with control immediately, and so nothing was done (no flares or scrambled F16s or anything).

But then, with the proximity of the White House to Reagan, what good would F16s be in that situation? Or any situation, for that matter? When the kid in Tampa decided to fly his Cessna into a building, planes were scrambled from MIAMI, even though MacDill AFB is right there in Tampa. (Thank goodness that was a weekend and there was no one in the building.)

I don't know much about how the Air Force handles things, but that seems to me to be a little "off-base". (No pun intended, really.)
Romeo Delta is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2002, 16:27
  #13 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,899
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

April 3, 2002

Frontier Airlines Pilot Suspended


Filed at 1:16 a.m. ET

DENVER (AP) -- A Frontier Airlines pilot who flew a 737 into restricted airspace near the White House has been suspended with pay while airline officials investigate.

Frontier spokeswoman Tracey Kelly said Tuesday the pilot was grounded. She would not release the pilot's name.

The jet, carrying 63 passengers and crew, entered the restricted airspace Monday after taking off from Reagan National Airport on a flight to Denver, FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown said. Air traffic controllers quickly directed the plane out of the airspace.

No fighter jets were sent to escort the plane and it landed in Denver without incident.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2002, 13:38
  #14 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cooper City, FL
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having prohibited airspace so close to a major airport is ludicrous to begin with because it cannot be defended effectively since the fighters patroling the area do not have the authority to shoot down aircraft before they enter that airspace. If they would have shot down that airliner before entering the restricted or prohibited airspace, I don't think there would be anyone flying within a 50 mile radius of the airport and therefore Regan National Airport would be history.
BigFlyr is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2002, 15:10
  #15 (permalink)  

I am a figment of my own imagination
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I guess what was a non event to Aisleman could be due to where he is sitting.

The seats up in the pointy end besides getting a better view do become hot seats from time to time. Could be why they pay us money to sit in em!
Paterbrat is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2002, 17:45
  #16 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Washington, DC USA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's the latest from the Washington Post. It appears the same crew had been diverted to Dulles earlier that day after getting the approach procedure to DCA wrong...

Story at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2002Apr3.html

Flight Crew Made Numerous Errors
Restricted Airspace Over Capital Was Violated Twice

By Don Phillips
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 4, 2002; Page A03

The Frontier Airlines flight crew that violated restricted airspace over Washington on Monday flew slightly west of the White House and the Washington Monument, then flew directly over the vice presidential residence on the Naval Observatory grounds while trying to get back on course, aviation sources said yesterday.

Earlier that day, the same crew had been forced to land at Dulles International Airport after failing to properly give the password for permission to fly to its original destination, Reagan National Airport.

The crew's two pilots, who have not been identified, have been suspended pending an investigation by the airline and the Federal Aviation Administration.

FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown said three other commercial flights and a medical helicopter have violated White House airspace since Sept. 11, but none as deeply as the Frontier flight. She said 35 other inbound planes have been diverted to Dulles because of failure to follow proper procedures, with the rate of diversions decreasing steadily each month.

Officials, puzzling yesterday over how one flight crew could make so many mistakes, said the incident involving Frontier Flight 724 points out both the strengths and weaknesses of flight security restrictions at National.

The Secret Service lobbied hard to keep National closed after the Sept. 11 hijackings, sources said, but President Bush decided otherwise after hearing from local officials about the devastating economic impact such a closing would have. Instead, new security measures were imposed, including more searches of passengers and baggage and special flight procedures.

The inbound flight procedures for Flight 724 were clearly successful. Making its initial descent into the Washington area, the plane was ordered to land "short" at Dulles after the crew failed to give the proper password -- which changes daily -- to the proper controller at the proper point.

If necessary, military planes may be called in to escort a plane that fails to give the password, but that apparently did not happen in this case. A North American Aerospace Defense Command spokesman in Colorado Springs was quoted in the Rocky Mountain News as saying the incidents were not deemed threatening by the FAA and there was no reason for NORAD to get involved.

Outbound, however, there is little anyone can do when a flight taking off on Runway 19 to the north does not make the proper left turn over the Potomac River. There has long been an urban legend that Stinger missiles are mounted on the White House roof, but sources said that has never been true. Shooting down a plane approaching the White House would only scatter burning fuel and wreckage over the District.

Numerous precautions are taken to remind pilots that they must make a left turn "as soon as practicable" after liftoff from Runway 19, then fly northwest directly over Rosslyn. The area is highlighted on aviation maps and charts, and there is a large sign at the takeoff end of Runway 19 giving pilots a last reminder. A recorded radio message giving airport and weather conditions, which pilots must monitor, always contains a reminder of the restrictions.

According to aviation sources, an air traffic controller in the National tower cleared Flight 819 to take off about 6:30 p.m., then turned his attention to inbound traffic from the south. When he looked north again, he saw that Flight 819 had not turned and immediately ordered the plane to turn left.

While turning, the plane flew directly over a small area of restricted airspace surrounding the vice president's residence in Northwest Washington.

Restricted airspace, called Area P-56A, covers most of downtown Washington from the Lincoln Memorial to Capitol Hill, and from the Tidal Basin to several blocks north of the White House. Area P-56B is the circle of airspace over the vice presidential residence.

The airspace between the two restricted areas is left open so medevac helicopters can fly to hospitals in the area.

Passengers aboard the inbound Frontier flight were never told why they were landing at Dulles. In fact, passenger Lawrence Kaufman of Denver said that after landing, a flight attendant made an announcement welcoming the passengers to National.

"I knew it wasn't National," said Kaufman, a transportation writer.

"I had a window seat so I was looking for the Potomac," he said. "I knew it was dry in the east but not that dry."

The pilot then announced that the plane had been told to land at Dulles, and said he didn't know why. The plane was surrounded by vehicles with flashing lights and escorted to an area away from the terminal.

The pilot got off the plane, then returned later and the plane took off for National. The passenger said the pilot never gave a reason for the diversion.

2002 The Washington Post Company
DC Meatloaf is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2002, 20:59
  #17 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strange, but you would think the Washington Post could get it right, or at least check out the story.

Having lived in and flown out of the Washington, DC area, I always thought the White House was North of the airport....hum, must have done some remodeling since the election.
wes_wall is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2002, 22:39
  #18 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,899
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

>>There has long been an urban legend that Stinger missiles are mounted on the White House roof, but sources said that has never been true. Shooting down a plane approaching the White House would only scatter burning fuel and wreckage over the District. <<

Well, they aren't Stingers and they aren't on the White House roof but it would be safe to assume that there is a missile battery (run by an elite Army unit) that defends the White House. They can certainly fire more than the flares mentioned in the article below.


April 4, 2002

94 Planes Flew Into DC No - Fly Zone


Filed at 4:48 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Pilots have flown through the prohibited airspace protecting the White House at least 94 times over the past decade, illustrating the challenges of thwarting a terrorist airstrike on the nation's capital.

Even with military jets patrolling the skies, four commercial airliners and a medical helicopter have crossed into Washington's no-fly zone since the Sept. 11 suicide hijackings, Federal Aviation Administration officials say. The latest was on Monday.

In most cases, pilots who violated the airspace protecting the White House, vice presidential mansion and Capitol have gotten penalties less severe than a parking ticket, an Associated Press review of FAA enforcement records found.

Just a month before the September hijackings, a Mesa Airlines flight strayed into prohibited airspace. By November, the matter was closed with a warning letter to the pilot -- common for most cases.

Security experts say violations of the Washington airspace highlight a key reality in the fight against terrorism -- planes that veer into the zone can crash into government installations within seconds.

"Practically speaking, by the time a violation is discovered, it is too late to do anything to prevent a crash into the White House,'' former FAA security chief Billie H. Vincent said.

FAA Deputy Administrator Monte R. Belger said Thursday the agency recognizes there's little time to react once planes penetrate the safety zone and so the government has imposed numerous other precautions to ensure planes with ill intent don't get close.

"The restricted area is kind of the last line of defense,'' Belger said. "The additional on-the-ground security procedures and in-flight protocols put in place give us a much higher level of confidence.''

Borders have been tightened; pilots, flight crews and passengers are screened to weed out possible terrorists, and planes approaching Washington must complete authentication procedures, including providing passwords.

About three dozen planes approaching Reagan National Airport have been turned away since Sept. 11 because they didn't complete the verification process, officials said.

Planes that violate the prohibited zone are quickly warned by the flight tower to correct course, and the Secret Service is alerted. Nearly all pilots comply immediately, officials said.

Military planes that patrol the capital skies are permitted to force such planes to land or, as a last resort, shoot them down if pilots don't respond.

None of the five planes that flew into the protected space since Sept. 11 have required such action, officials said.

In an announcement last fall about improved protection of Washington's airspace, the FAA said pilots who infringed the no-fly zone faced "suspension or revocation of their licenses or a fine.''

But FAA's enforcement database, obtained by AP under the Freedom of Information Act, shows nearly all the violators since 1992 have gotten just a warning letter.

Of the 111 pilots on the 94 flights, just one was fined, for $1,000, and nine had their licenses suspended for between seven to 120 days.

At least 90 cases were settled by administrative action, mostly warning or correction letters, the records show. Four violating pilots had their penalties reversed later.

Reagan National was closed for more than a month after the attacks, and has been gradually reopened to traffic since despite reservations by the Secret Service.

One pilot died when he crashed his small plane into the White House in the mid-1990s; no one else was harmed. In 1999, a pilot drifted so close to the White House that agents fired a warning flare. That pilot ended up with a warning letter, FAA records say.

"Air security is certainly something we deal with on a daily basis, both with being in constant communication with tower at Reagan and with the FAA,'' Secret Service spokesman James Mackin said.

The five most recent airspace violations are still being investigated, including a Frontier Airlines 737 jet that flew over the White House and vice presidential residence on Monday before correcting its path. That pilot has been grounded with pay.

American Airlines has had two jets fly into the zone since Sept. 11, US Airways has had one and the fifth incident involved a medical transport helicopter.

FAA records show violators over the past decade include about three dozen pilots for major commercial airlines, one Air Force pilot, one NASA pilot, a handful of private or foreign pilots and several air transport companies.

American Airlines topped the list of commercial airlines with at least eight pilots cited. US Airways had seven, Continental four and three each from Delta, Northwest and America West.

One pilot caught in the airspace blamed air traffic controllers, saying they are so busy they sometimes order flight maneuvers that send pilots into the prohibited zone.

"The D.C. controllers are absolutely horrible. Washington National is absolutely the worst place to fly into, period,'' said Happy Wells, a 30-year veteran pilot from Oklahoma who was cited in July 1997 for flying his charter plane through Washington's prohibited zone.

Wells said his proposed penalty was rescinded after he filed a report with the FAA.

Operators of Reagan National said the violations aren't necessarily a sign of lax security. Pilots can be knocked off course by something as simple as heavy wind.

FAA says it has settled most cases with warning letters because it believes pilots were operating in good faith at an airport considered one of the toughest to navigate.

Former U.S. Transportation Department Inspector General Mary Schiavo, who highlighted airline safety problems in the 1990s and now works as a lawyer representing airline accident victims, said the small number of suspensions is a sign of laissez-faire enforcement.

"It is fairly typical. The FAA really doesn't like to do enforcement actions, particularly any carrier infringement,'' Schiavo said.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2002, 22:45
  #19 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The time is loooong overdue to close DCA, permanently. The Senators will HAVE to accept the longer bus (limo) ride elsewhere....tough beans.
411A is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2002, 05:09
  #20 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would rather see us put it all in real perspective. I guess it seems rather non logical in the scheme of things to close DCA, EVEN as threatening as it may be. Im opposed to surrendering our way of life to such an extent. If cockpit doors are closed I think youve just cut the risk very low already. Creating even more drastic changes is silly. While we all focus on the next terrorist attack coming from suicide bombers, our enemies just pour over the myriad of other options. We didnt see 9/11 coming-- what is happening this minute that we dont see?
If youre going to close any airport then you might as well close them all. I just think were being too cautious.
BigJETS is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.