Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Caribbean B738 at Georgetown on Jul 30, 2011, overran runway

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Caribbean B738 at Georgetown on Jul 30, 2011, overran runway

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jul 2011, 22:21
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the damage inflicted to it, would it be safe to assume a runway excursion on a rather low forward speed? Lets say, below 100kt?

The wx conditions at around the misshap time:
SYCJ 300600Z 00000KT 9000 BKN015 24/24 Q1008 NOSIG
SYCJ 300500Z 00000KT 9000 -SHRA FEW014CB BKN015 25/24 Q1009 CB-NE-ENE NOSIG
SYCJ 300423Z 00000KT 9999 TS FEW015CB SCT016 CB-NE-ENE NOSIG

Seems they were trying to stop it until the last moment
Broomstick Flier is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 22:40
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Sandbox
Age: 37
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As to the lack of flaps/slats.....perhaps that particular Captain retracted them at touchdown on short runways to dump the lift and, supposedly help with the stopping. Just a thought. I never did that but it WILL work.
I strongly doubt that..
PH-MVK is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 23:28
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Short runway, gets shorter when wet.

Operated in/out of Georgetown for 6+ years in the B-707. As previously mentioned, the ILS was "intermittant", often going OTS in bad weather. Had the runway lights stolen ( copper $$ ) twice. So, security no so secure.
Short runway, often wet, ILS untrustworthy, lighting probably works, in a very black hole in the jungle. Fun times.
I have to say though, I worked with some of the nicest, giving people I ever knew ( Guyanese ).
FirstStep is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 23:28
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Over Mache Grande?
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shell Management...

Seeing the AA pictures just serves to remind that the airline industry is not learning (and relearning) fast enougth.
Yes - you're spot on - it's definitely an identical set of circumstances and clearly no lessons have been learnt... Pillock.
dwshimoda is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2011, 23:58
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many here are mentioning the ILS, funny enough I am unable to find any chart for the said ILS (neither for 06 or 24) on my jeppview software, properly updated. Gone for good?

There are four IALs available: two RNAV (24 and 06) and two VOR (06 only)
Broomstick Flier is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 00:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: florida
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't take long

'Maybe it says something about the quality of the pilots / planes in those regions'

Not sure what Ross M meant, but i wondered how long before this kind of insinuation would come out.. funny didn't hear this when AF overran in Montreal, Iberia in Colombia or somewhere down there with the 340, when EK did a great deal of damage in JNB or AA in Kingston recently, etc., etc.

Come on guys.... it may well be human error, but lets not regionalize it.

I do agree from first-hand experience that there seems to be an inordinate amount of credit given for smooth landings as an indicator of good performance in the region, and i agree with other commentators that this certainly would not have been an occasion for such a landing if the weather reports and assumed runway surface condition is correct...
Winton is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 01:06
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Where the job is
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B738 landing distance with all flaps up

Includes 305m air distance from threshold, max reverse and max manual brakes

Dry RWY 1225m / 4020ft

Medium braking action 2340m / 7670ft

Poor braking action 3090m / 10200ft

Problem with flaps, distant/bad weather alternate, checked the books and decided that they can just make it. Got caught between assumed and actual
braking action or by some of the adjustments for speed/weight/slope of the
basic distance, another 100-200m.
flox is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 01:13
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1996
Location: Check with Ops
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A FA friend mentioned, on B738s, once the emergency evacuation is activated,the flaps will retract to allow pax to use the overwing exits as an evacuation area...
How is the that going to happen? You've shut down the engines and pulled the engine fire switches, therefore there's no hydraulic, nor electrical power. The flaps can't just magic themselves up. Maybe some further reading required of your FA friend.
Pontius is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 06:42
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Not here any more.
Posts: 646
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Internal culture.

As ZQA commented

Too early to speculate what happened, or why it happened, but when BWIA was closed, many of the more experienced pilots were picked up by sandpit operators. The pilots union was squeezed out, and a new philosophy was put in place. Let us say it was slanted to "productivity".
They say that a safety culture dies slowly unless nurtured carefully.
It has been 5 years since the old regime was broken up, I hope the replacement will stand scrutiny in the investigation.
I do hope they can stand an audit. Most of the trainers and fleet managers from the old BWIA along with more than half the line pilots plus the same with the ex Air Jamaica pilots who were merged had to find new homes, mainly in the UAE, UK, US and India.
NG_Kaptain is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 08:26
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yellow Brick Road
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From my NG Cockpit Companion, the horn is activated if flaps up through 10 and thrust levers are set for landing. From my memory the horn is loud enough to wake the dead.
ReverseFlight is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 09:28
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: castles made of sand
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a sad day for Aviation in Trinidad. No hull loses from a national carrier in history. A sader day for the crew...
This could happen to anyone so think about that before you hang anyone out to dry.
cochise is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 09:30
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Far Side
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Reverse flight.
Plus GPWS yelling "too low, flaps!!"
I doubt the approach was made without flaps, unless pilots were totally deaf.
If memory serves me, policy on flap/slat retraction was "clear of runway, with aircraft under control". I dont think both conditions were met.
ZQA297/30 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 09:40
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But they could have had a problem - we do not know!!
Walder is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 11:36
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: jordan
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt anything aft of the fuselage fracture would be still controlable from the flightdeck.
It is possible to retract/extent flaps/slats with the electric pumps but when the electrical wires are severed between flightdeck and pump it will not be possible.
This of course goes for all other systems which are controlled in similar fashion.
contractor25 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 11:55
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Caribbean fleet changes

Just following up on some comments made about the airline's training, I note that in the days leading up to this incident, the carrier added two more 738s (one brand new, 9Y-SXM, from Boeing, and another, 9Y-JMF, which was delivered from SNN on the 28th), with a third, 9Y-JMC, to be added imminently; I know it's not a large airline and presumably this addition of new aircraft would have put a lot of pressure on the airline's training dept.

Do we know anything about the experience of the crew involved in this incident?
akerosid is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 12:05
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I doubt the approach was made without flaps, unless pilots were totally deaf.
Mere speculation, but could there be any conceivable malfunctions causing inadvertent flap retraction just about touchdown? That'd explain a lot of the inconsistencies.
ross_M is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 12:16
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A FA friend mentioned, on B738s, once the emergency evacuation is activated,the flaps will retract to allow pax to use the overwing exits as an evacuation area...
There is no way, this plane would have landed with 0 flap settings...
? What is the " emergency evacuation" this does not exist... evacuation checklist are read and do items on back of QRH, not some magic button that starts the process.

If time allows verify flaps are at 40 etc etc..

If the hydraulics fail the flaps/slats lock out not retract.. that's why we have hydraulic fuses
Avenger is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 12:44
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Age: 63
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flox- you have the estimation for their required landing distance flaps up with poor braking action at well over 3000 metres. A quick look at the reported runway length of 7540 ft makes it something that was never going to happen.
Mimpe is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 14:40
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thinks they already selected flaps up during the landing roll and when finally stopped obviously not able to select flap 40 again. To me more interesting, did they use reverse untill 60 kt, were they braking from the beginning till the end, and what was the AB setting? That's probably something we'll read in the report...
wingview is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2011, 15:21
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reversers seems open = have been used intil the crash.
But when they been opend is so far unknown.
Walder is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.