Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Report about Air Atlanta B743 engine fire (25th March 2008) published

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Report about Air Atlanta B743 engine fire (25th March 2008) published

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jul 2011, 07:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Nightrider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Report about Air Atlanta B743 engine fire (25th March 2008) published

Luckily all escaped, also some with minor injuries, this despite several flaws during the event, read here
 
Old 8th Jul 2011, 08:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: near EDDF
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I prefer the Final Report from the IAAIB (Icelandic Aircraft Accident Investigation Board).
IFixPlanes is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 10:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: near EDDF
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No. The Final Report was released at 1.Jul.2011:
Flugslys TF-ARS (Boeing 747)*Zia International Airport, Dhaka, Bangladesh ţann 25. mars 2008 | Fréttir | Rannsóknarnefnd flugslysa

Any link to your "believe"?
IFixPlanes is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 10:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 80
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This has been a problem area for many years - I had a similar incident in Riyadh in the mid 80's - fortunately with no fire damage. The pylon area drains were blocked with high temp sealant on assembly and the leak from the Wiggins coupling filled up the pylon. Some months later I had a letter from Boeing asking for a report which I gave them - the result was a check to ensure that all pylon drains were clear. The cause of the leak was hardening of the O ring seals in the fitting - when I removed them they were like hard plastic and square in section. The fitting concerned is used in many locations on 747 aircraft for Fuel lines and on some SP aircraft for hydraulic lines - it is used where some flexibility is required as in this case between pylon and front spar.On several occasions I have seen incorrect assembly which fortunately did not result in fires,in my opinion this type of coupling is a hazard which is of dubious reliability.
bcgallacher is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2011, 15:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,205
Received 404 Likes on 250 Posts
From the report:


After opening the coupling it was discovered that one of the two retaining rings was missing (See Figure 15) and the O-ring was in the wrong position (not on the fuel line). Therefore the O-ring was probably not sealing as it should when correctly installed.


The total flying hours of the aircraft was 99,327:35 and total cycles were 18,779.
Sorry to see the plane could not be economically repaired, but it looks as though this hull provided many years of service.


Lonewolf_50 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.