Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Rejecting a 7700?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Rejecting a 7700?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Oct 2010, 20:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: us
Age: 63
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PS: The guy is supposedly a nut case who made bomb threats before.
vovachan is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2010, 21:01
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South of England, Way South
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simply curious.

If the bomb threat was made in the US.... and the nearest runway was Regan National.... Do we think that the US authorities would permit a landing there?
Kent BeTrue is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2010, 22:45
  #23 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not really true for security alerts is it? Ryanair and Prestwick springs to mind.
Certain airfields are designated to receive this sort of traffic for a large number of reasons. ATC is not one of them, nor has it anything to do with the decision making process.

Last edited by Lon More; 6th Oct 2010 at 06:46.
Lon More is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2010, 23:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MNL ex CCR ex CLE
Age: 65
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
" what would have been the reaction from the ground had anyone tried that on September 11,2001? "

This seems a bit of apples and oranges....a possible threat as opposed to an actual attack and it's aftermath, with the SCATANA protocol activated.
I'm sure, in your scenario, they probably would have been diverted to a military field....same for the Reagan National scenario - lots of suitable military fields close by....imo.
PA-28-180 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2010, 00:07
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of all the suitable airports in India, runway length, fire cover etc. was Delhi actually the nearest airport or the first identity that sprang to the crew's mind perhaps taking in to consideration Delhi was already on SQ's network, handling agent, crew change, daily check, crew hotel etc?

Obviously the crew's minds were distracted by another circumstance but nominating to divert to a major capital city with a, possible, bomb on board with a worldwide televised event going on, well .....

Just curious what Heathrow would say .... "Hello Heathrow, we've got no slot, we've got a bomb on board, can we come in?" ..... "Nope, you can p1ss off to Stansted" ... just perhaps
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2010, 00:44
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SVQ aircraft denied emargency landing at Delhi.

OK Folks,
I do not know all the facts re this incident, but if my understanding of the reports is correct, there is one action that could be taken
Any international Air India flight is banned from any airspace other than their own for a month or so.
kaikohe76 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2010, 02:11
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: US
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying mostly to central america, south america and the caribbean I don't think any of those countries would park trucks on their runway to not let you land in an emergency situation. Saving your passengers and crew is your only concern and none of those countries would hinder you from expeditiously getting your aircraft on the ground safely. I don't know about the far east. seems pretty barbaric. By the way I didn't say I would go direct watch my blip unless they wouldn't cooperate and give me the expeditious handling I needed at the time. One of our pilots had to do that because they weren't responding to his request.

Last edited by p51guy; 6th Oct 2010 at 02:35.
p51guy is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2010, 05:30
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Double Oak, Texas
Age: 71
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P51guy
Flying mostly to central america, south america and the caribbean I don't think any of those countries would park trucks on their runway to not let you land in an emergency situation.
Flying one night over Port Au Prince in the mid to late 90's on way to the South, a Lear Jet radioed pan, pan, pan to Port Au Prince and simultaneously declared emergency with some sort of mechanical difficulty and informed PAP that he was going to land at PAP. ATC actually answered rather quickly (!!!!) and informed the Lear they could NOT land PAP. The pilot pressed the issue and was informed by ATC that it would be fired upon if it attempted a landing at PAP. The Lear diverted next door to the D.R. at Santo Domingo. Apparently there was some sort of coup or somesuch and Haiti wasn't accepting anybody that evening.
SKS777FLYER is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2010, 07:59
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Pa 128 Notam

PA - 128

"Though a Notice To Airmen (NOTAM) had been issued in view of the high security and restrictions for the CWG opening ceremony, an emergency landing should have been allowed," said an experienced captain. "

Read more: Flight 3 hours in air despite bomb alert - The Times of India Flight 3 hours in air despite bomb alert - The Times of India

Still certain he could have landed at Amritsar or Lahore as they were equally close choices.
Wannabe Flyer is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2010, 14:23
  #30 (permalink)  
742
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simply curious.

If the bomb threat was made in the US.... and the nearest runway was Regan National.... Do we think that the US authorities would permit a landing there?
Certainly the flight would not be shot down and the runway would not be blocked, so the basic answer is "yes". However IAD or BWI would be a better choice for all concerned for numerous reasons that have nothing to do with security.
742 is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2010, 14:44
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uae
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who cares about an airspace notam, "Bomb/smoke/fire" on the ground ASAP. Agree with the post " declare mayday" ATC should do everything to assist, Delhi ATC should be hung . I'm putting it the ground where I want when I want,period
fatbus is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2010, 15:03
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N24 E56
Posts: 12
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OPLA (Lahore) would have been the nearest one it seems that only airline requirement due crew change available was catered for not safety.
inducedrag is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2010, 21:18
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: 31000FR
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fatbus, I hope you are sticking to the more regular destinations, īcause had you tried to come into DEL with a Specific Bomb Threat that evening, you would have ended up with some Russian hardware in your tailpipe. It was as close to a war zone as it comes without dogfights, and knowing from the locals the amount of SAMs and MIGs being deployed it is Incredible that nobody repeated the opening scene from the classic film "The Party" .
Nice to sit in an armchair in Dubai or in Norhalne polishing the ego but not as much fun as doing evasive maneuvres down the final to DEL as we had to do that night . NOTAM or ATIS? No, that would have given too much clue about what to come next, and you donīt do that when you expect to be under attack . Paranoia? India has more terror related killings than the rest of the world combined (look up the statistics), so the percieved threat is very present. Flight safety? Some day it will hopefully take precedence over Security and Politics, but that day will not come until a lot of fundamentals have changed in this part of the world .
Come and enjoy the Commonwealth Games; there are lots of vacant hotel rooms and seats in DEL: War tourism has yet to gain in popularity .
T.
Capt Turbo is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2010, 02:34
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall an incident a year ago where an aeroflot aircraft with a medical emergency was denied landing in the US and had to land in Canada. The reason given was that the flight had departed from Cuba.

I donīt remember the whole story, and I imagine that a medical emergency is not a bomb threat, but I remember reading in the papers that it is the US policy to deny landing to any aircraft, of any airline, coming from Cuba, even in case of an emergency. Is this true?
Vld1977 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2010, 04:30
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OPLA (Lahore) would have been the nearest one it seems that only airline requirement due crew change available was catered for not safety.
I think that says it all!!! So maybe SQ should respond
Wannabe Flyer is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2010, 05:59
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Double Oak, Texas
Age: 71
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vid1977
I recall an incident a year ago where an aeroflot aircraft with a medical emergency was denied landing in the US and had to land in Canada. The reason given was that the flight had departed from Cuba.

I donīt remember the whole story, and I imagine that a medical emergency is not a bomb threat, but I remember reading in the papers that it is the US policy to deny landing to any aircraft, of any airline, coming from Cuba, even in case of an emergency. Is this true?
Don't know, but I do know that several U.S. carriers have regular service between the U.S. and Cuba. American Airlines flew a daily 727 back in the 90's to Jose Marti from Miami. The flights operated as Special Authorization Charters and as far as I know AA still has some flights to Cuba from Mia along with American Eagle.
Also, for decades now, U.S. air Carriers have traversed across Cuban airspace mostly for cities on the South American continent. Don't know what the ATC charges are these days, but back in the early 90's, the charges were about $165 each way per flight. The Cuban controllers were, I think among the top tier of controllers thruout North, Central and South America. Effecient and generally helpful, offering direct routings on request and often offering direct routings on initial contact with Havana Center.
SKS777FLYER is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2010, 06:40
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere over the Rainbow
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall an incident a year ago where an aeroflot aircraft with a medical emergency was denied landing in the US and had to land in Canada. The reason given was that the flight had departed from Cuba.
Aeroflot A332 over Atlantic on Oct 8th 2009, medical emergency refused by USA

Delhi ATC should be hung
By equality so should JFK!!!
Wannabe Flyer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.