Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Air France jet lands after bomb threat

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Air France jet lands after bomb threat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jul 2010, 05:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air France jet lands after bomb threat

Brazil: Air France jet lands after bomb threat - Yahoo! News


By BRADLEY BROOKS, Associated Press Writer Bradley Brooks, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 21 mins ago

RIO DE JANEIRO – An Air France passenger jet headed from Rio to Paris made an emergency landing in northeastern Brazil Saturday night due to a bomb threat.

All 405 passengers and 18 crew members were safely evacuated from Air France Flight 443, said Jorge Andrade, a spokesman for airport authority Infraero.

A spokesman for Air France in Brazil said the bomb threat was phoned in to Rio's international airport by a female voice about 30 minutes after the plane took off.

The control tower contacted the jet and the decision was made to land in Recife, the Air France spokesman. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter.

The spokesman said authorities had not found any explosives after a five-hour search, and the jet was expected to be cleared to continue to Paris.

Solange Argenta, an Infraero spokeswoman at the Recife airport, said the flight took off at 4:20 p.m. (3:20 p.m. EDT; 1920 GMT) and that the plane landed in Recife at 7:53 p.m. (6:53 p.m. EDT; 2253 GMT).

Infraero said in a statement that after landing in Recife, the jet taxied to a secluded area of the airport and those on board were quickly removed. The airport was closed for about 30 minutes, and then reopened.

Flight 443 was on the same route as an Air France jet that crashed last June off Brazil's northeastern coast, killing all 228 on board. While no definite cause has been determined in the crash, authorities have repeatedly ruled out foul play.
Dnapps is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2010, 06:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the mysteries of AF447 can be wrapped up now and laid to rest.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2010, 09:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 73
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Err, yes, well... quite!

The conclusion is: There is never a bomb on board. At least not one that anyone's going to tell you about.
Whilst I appreciate you have a different perspective from up there in Seat 0A, down the back here in 46C, I would be most grateful if you could trouble yourself to just pop into Recife and make sure
JohnMcGhie is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2010, 12:07
  #4 (permalink)  
wozzo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by GobonaStick
The conclusion is: There is never a bomb on board. At least not one that anyone's going to tell you about.
You are absolutely right. But would you take personal responsibility for letting the flight continue?
 
Old 11th Jul 2010, 12:45
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,799
Received 121 Likes on 58 Posts
Bomb threats are run through a decision tree in order to grade the threat. Only threats with serious elements are passed to crew - so as crew, if you receive a threat in the air you know it has already been assessed as serious. Hence the diversion.

If, for instance, a giggling child's voice called in a non-specific warning, on a low-threat route, the assessment would probably result in the crew not even being informed.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2010, 15:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: It wasn't me, I wasn't there, wrong country ;-)
Age: 79
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gobonastick

'Gobonastick' A very apt handle that me thinks
merlinxx is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2010, 17:15
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Munich, Germany
Age: 80
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are absolutely right, checkboard, a thread assessor will
make the decision. These are smart guys and to my knowledge
never went wrong.

BEA 71
BEA 71 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2010, 18:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If there was really a bomb on board, why would you phone in a warning?
Compassionate girlfriend, for instance...
poorjohn is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2010, 19:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You are absolutely right, checkboard, a thread assessor will
make the decision. These are smart guys and to my knowledge
never went wrong.

BEA 71
Those are kind words for the PPRune forum moderators
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2010, 20:02
  #10 (permalink)  
Second Law
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wirral
Age: 77
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Irony from Iomapaseo!

Excellent!!

CW
chris weston is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2010, 04:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: china
Age: 36
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
safety

hope the air transportation will become more safer..
pinghenglin505 is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2010, 12:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Europe
Age: 49
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And I hope all these that use bombs or other devices to attack aircraft will simply die and not being replaced. This will make airport security obsolete.

Oh, wait, I love those guys touching me, scanning my luggage and my body. The day will come we all have to drop our pants and to make a bow.
sprocky_ger is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2010, 01:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Planet Earth, mostly
Posts: 467
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
These are smart guys and to my knowledge
never went wrong.
What do you mean by "never went wrong"? How do you know thwy were not wrong in this case? And what exactly is your knowledge based on?
etrang is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.