Air France rejected T/O in Lagos
I realise this AF incident was a different kettle of fish but, FDR, I don't really think we've got to the point where we have to reject a take off just because the autothrottles dont engage.
During take off a few years ago on a 767-400 our AT'S did not engage (AT was armed) so we manually set the thrust and carried on, no big fuss.
This sort of coordination was done for many, many years on more 'primitive' Aircraft. Granted it's easier with an FE and i'd be happy to have them around still as well, even so..
In our case we never regained use of the AT'S (faulty thrust computer) so we set our own power from LAX-HNL, a non event.
Having flown several 'Jurassic Jets' for many years I always considered Autothrottles to be a (very nice) luxury.
Unless there were other failures I would make the same decision today.
During take off a few years ago on a 767-400 our AT'S did not engage (AT was armed) so we manually set the thrust and carried on, no big fuss.
This sort of coordination was done for many, many years on more 'primitive' Aircraft. Granted it's easier with an FE and i'd be happy to have them around still as well, even so..
In our case we never regained use of the AT'S (faulty thrust computer) so we set our own power from LAX-HNL, a non event.
Having flown several 'Jurassic Jets' for many years I always considered Autothrottles to be a (very nice) luxury.
Unless there were other failures I would make the same decision today.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
During take off a few years ago on a 767-400 our AT'S did not engage (AT was armed) so we manually set the thrust and carried on, no big fuss.
Also, with the thrust management computer inop, nuisance exceedance reports will be put on the QAR tape, I speak from experience. Engine indications will turn amber if you exceed max continuous on takeoff even though it is not a limitation in the first five minutes of the flight.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My opinion....
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that I agree wholeheartedly with 411A. Having been a flight engineer, myself, I was able to sit back and look, from a distance...if you will....and see the forest for the trees. A respectful callout to the guys up front would bring to their attention something that wasn't quite right.
A similar situation exists in the simulator. The sim instructor gets to see (and take in) a lot more of what is going on....because he (she) is sitting back and observing the whole picture.
A good flight engineer is worth his weight in gold. (The same can be said for a good first officer, by the way.)
Today's planes are designed with automation that eliminates the need for the flight engineer. But, I'd much rather have a good flight engineer, instead of all this automation.
My opinion only....
Fly safe,
PantLoad
A similar situation exists in the simulator. The sim instructor gets to see (and take in) a lot more of what is going on....because he (she) is sitting back and observing the whole picture.
A good flight engineer is worth his weight in gold. (The same can be said for a good first officer, by the way.)
Today's planes are designed with automation that eliminates the need for the flight engineer. But, I'd much rather have a good flight engineer, instead of all this automation.
My opinion only....
Fly safe,
PantLoad
Points worth considering AB but no other malfunctions / abnormalities were present.
The flaps were down already and had been checked !
It was a very simple issue to address manually, no exceedances were made on any engine limits as we carefully monitored the power (just like we used to do on older Aircraft)
Doubtless a QAR record was kept, thats good. After writing up the incident in detail in the maintenance log and with our flight operations department our actions were never questioned by anyone in Flt Ops management, maintenance or the FAA.
Not sure if you realise the Aircraft can be dispatched with autothrottles inop.
Everything else works very well thank you.
I am curious to know what else you would reject for.
The flaps were down already and had been checked !
It was a very simple issue to address manually, no exceedances were made on any engine limits as we carefully monitored the power (just like we used to do on older Aircraft)
Doubtless a QAR record was kept, thats good. After writing up the incident in detail in the maintenance log and with our flight operations department our actions were never questioned by anyone in Flt Ops management, maintenance or the FAA.
Not sure if you realise the Aircraft can be dispatched with autothrottles inop.
Everything else works very well thank you.
I am curious to know what else you would reject for.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lagos
Age: 52
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was a passenger on this flight,this would explain why it took so long for the thrust to kick in,until deep in the runway say 1500ft.
Will be a good topic for CRM today!!!
The stop over in lagos was scheduled about two hours.
Will be a good topic for CRM today!!!
The stop over in lagos was scheduled about two hours.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Not sure if you realise the Aircraft can be dispatched with autothrottles inop.
Anyway, the feds are big on deferrals, paperwork and decision matrices these days from what I can see.
I am curious to know what else you would reject for.
RTO Reasons....
I realise this AF incident was a different kettle of fish but, FDR, I don't really think we've got to the point where we have to reject a take off just because the autothrottles dont engage.
Off hand I can think of 4 events where the ATR didn't engage, and a flapless takeoff ensued, which resulted in fatalities: DC-9, MD80, B737 x 2. I know of numerous cases where the ATR didn't engage on B744's, and after messing about finally the crew manually set thrust, to find the next warning was CONFIGURATION-FLAPS. In 2 cases the crews set the flaps on the roll.... neat trick- low drag takeoffs.....
Setting the thrust back to idle and pondering what is going on, and ensuring that the procedures and checklists have been followed, seems a fairly low rent/low stress solution, as the thrust is normally set from stable (various engines various values) around 10-20Kts GS... this is a fairly low energy state.
The FCTM does allow manual thrust setting, no question, however the crew fault finding and changing switches without adhering to standard crew actions and callouts as characterised in the Introduction to the Boeing QRH is going to be hard to justify in the light of an erroneous selection being made on the fly, or following an ad-hoc procedure.
Systems wise, program safety is not predicated on the best pilots and operators, it is based on the lowest levels of each on a bad day.
fdr....
Excellent call!
The oversight of the ATR switch in the preflight check, where it is listed in the POM, Ch5.3 needs also to be assessed in the light of duty time/fatigue/etc before lining up the messenger against a suitably pockmarked wall.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The FCTM does allow manual thrust setting, no question, however the crew fault finding and changing switches without adhering to standard crew actions and callouts as characterised in the Introduction to the Boeing QRH is going to be hard to justify in the light of an erroneous selection being made on the fly, or following an ad-hoc procedure.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is the PM doing, Im sure, "outside" when he is suppose to be monitoring PFD's, ND's, Eng Inst, etc?
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nigeria
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe looking for guided missiles, crap on the runway, kangaroos, stray lions or starving locals looking for road kill
Sorry matey, no Roos here. The only wild animals here are corrupt politicians. Sorry I digress
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southwest
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote
"So why were the autothrottle arm switches off? There is no reason to turn them off and particularly as the aircraft was on a transit stop anyway."
To my knowledge, A/T are set off during taxi out because AF decided that if you mistakenly press the switch on the trust lever, you will get the take off thrust on the taxiway which was considered more dangerous than forgetting the A/T. It seems that they are wrong but SOP may have changed and I haven’ been flying this aircraft since 2003
"So why were the autothrottle arm switches off? There is no reason to turn them off and particularly as the aircraft was on a transit stop anyway."
To my knowledge, A/T are set off during taxi out because AF decided that if you mistakenly press the switch on the trust lever, you will get the take off thrust on the taxiway which was considered more dangerous than forgetting the A/T. It seems that they are wrong but SOP may have changed and I haven’ been flying this aircraft since 2003
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Some airport hotel
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am with you guys who go the FE route, I still fly with the voice activated, hairy hand actuated throttle set up, will miss it when we finally move to something clever.
I do not fly these modern aircraft, but am still pretty alarmed that this situation occured, some lucky people there by all accounts.
I do not fly these modern aircraft, but am still pretty alarmed that this situation occured, some lucky people there by all accounts.
Controversial, moi?
I am with you guys who go the FE route, I still fly with the voice activated, hairy hand actuated throttle set up, will miss it when we finally move to something clever.
I do not fly these modern aircraft, but am still pretty alarmed that this situation occured, some lucky people there by all accounts.
I do not fly these modern aircraft, but am still pretty alarmed that this situation occured, some lucky people there by all accounts.
What we have in this incident, if our understanding is correct, is poor adherence to checklists, poor SOPs and poor airmanship leading to a very serious error. Employing a flight engineer to cover for a pilot's apparent lack of training or airmanship would seem OTT.
Connecting the lack of autothrottle engagement to lack of flap extension is reasonable.
Just as reasonable as manually setting thrust after checking all else is well.
Just as reasonable as manually setting thrust after checking all else is well.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pretty far away
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not Australian airlines, this would have been Ansett.
This dates back to the 744 early days many many moons ago. It happened to the then Ops chief who, by mistake, activated the palm switch on a taxiway. It was a close one.
It was decided the switch was to be off before take off and to be switched on when approaching the runway.
Today, it is to be switched on before start up and switched off after landing.
On a 2 legs trip.................that's where the hole in the cheese is.
To my knowledge, A/T are set off during taxi out because AF decided that if you mistakenly press the switch on the trust lever, you will get the take off thrust on the taxiway which was considered more dangerous than forgetting the A/T. It seems that they are wrong but SOP may have changed and I haven’ been flying this aircraft since 2003
It was decided the switch was to be off before take off and to be switched on when approaching the runway.
Today, it is to be switched on before start up and switched off after landing.
On a 2 legs trip.................that's where the hole in the cheese is.
Controversial, moi?
Not Australian airlines, this would have been Ansett.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi 'M.Mouse' and 'Me Myself',
I was flying with Australian Airlines back in those days, and believe me, Australian did not have ANY B767s at all,
further, Ansett were the ONLY B767s in the world that had the FE mod (an ex-RAAF friend of mine used to fly 'em).
Ya shoulda been in a '72, they were the greatest, and that's the way I'll always remember it!
(Both airlines had them!)
The mob I'm in now (B737NGs), recently changed their procedures to get the A/T armed only when approaching the departure runway, simply for safety reasons, due the likelyhood of accidental TOGA actuation!
Digression complete!
Cheers...FD
I was flying with Australian Airlines back in those days, and believe me, Australian did not have ANY B767s at all,
further, Ansett were the ONLY B767s in the world that had the FE mod (an ex-RAAF friend of mine used to fly 'em).
Ya shoulda been in a '72, they were the greatest, and that's the way I'll always remember it!
(Both airlines had them!)
The mob I'm in now (B737NGs), recently changed their procedures to get the A/T armed only when approaching the departure runway, simply for safety reasons, due the likelyhood of accidental TOGA actuation!
Digression complete!
Cheers...FD