Iran Air off runway at Arlanda
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Swedish Havarikommission (SAIB) released their final report concluding the probable causes of the incident were:
Operational
- Deficiencies in the certification process for large aircraft with wing-mounted engines with regard to requirements for yaw stability in the event of sudden loss of engine power in the speed range below VMCG.
Operational
- Deficiencies in the certification process for large aircraft with wing-mounted engines with regard to requirements for yaw stability in the event of sudden loss of engine power in the speed range below VMCG.
Does that mean, beside these lovely but over 40 years old planes, ALL LARGE AIRCRAFTS WITH WING-MOUNTED engines are affected?
Originally Posted by Centaurus
There is no time to go through the classic identification sequences and trying to remember whose area of responsibility it is. It's all over Red Rover in 5-10 seconds unless you cut that engine. That is why it is better to cut both engines in case the wrong engine is identified
Commonsense (wash ya mouth out with soap, Bloggs!) is not allowed. 
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which is why you close the other throttle PDQ. In any case, Vmcg refers only to rudder control, not to brakes and nosewheel steering
EDITED for dysleckseer
EDITED for dysleckseer
Last edited by BOAC; 20th Jan 2013 at 07:54.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ultima Thule
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm slightly surprised nobody has mentioned the term Vmcg. Directional control is not possible below 114kts on the A300 after loss of one engine during take off roll.
