Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Easyjet already on Strike

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Easyjet already on Strike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Dec 2009, 10:00
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Around the block
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doug the Head

I agree to the extent that its not easy to guess a oil price. Although, someone is actually payed a lot of moeny AND recieving a large bonus every year to be good in guessing!

Its like stocks or whatever; its a science where your guessing becomes more accurate the more you know and the more competent you are. Pro-active....

However, how can you even think that the oil price will continue to rise from $180 a barrel for a substantial future, and actually stay at the all time high price? If the price would have stayed there for long, the whole world would have gone bankrupt.

Come on, that was really, really stupid

And we are the ones paying for it. Again.

Cant believe that person is still working for the orange...........
Viking101 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2009, 10:04
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hangar 69
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hedging vs decent planning.

Exactly, but the point is: you win some, you lose some.

- actually they get it wrong alot of the time! That is why the banking system almost failed.
That's the whole point. It's extremely hard to predict prices. As long as, overall, you win more than you lose, then the game is well (enough) played. Even if losses = gains, then at least you dampen the price volatility effects. That's all hedging is: it hedges against (extreme) price fluctuations, and in going from $147 to $33, and back to $75 is definitely extremely volatile!

If an airline is consistently good in betting on oil/fuel prices, then perhaps they should be in the hedge fund business instead of the airline business! I suppose it's much easier than running an airline, just set up an account and make money! No unions or nasty employees to deal with, and IF (heaven forbid) you lose money, then just pass the bill to the taxpayers!!
Doug the Head is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2009, 10:12
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SW France
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If an airline is consistently good in betting on oil/fuel prices, then perhaps they should be in the hedge fund business instead of the airline business! I suppose it's much easier than running an airline, just set up an account and make money! No unions or nasty employees to deal with, and IF (heaven forbid) you lose money, then just pass the bill to the taxpayers!!

That is what happened with Enron, they strayed from their business of being an energy firm to that of a speculating financial machine that umtimately collapsed and had many knock on effects.

The danger for society is when big players in an industry (as with the banks) play too much and create systemic risk that threatens all aboard. A bit like two pilots getting too distracted playing on their laptops when they should be managing the aircraft.
juniour jetset is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2009, 10:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hangar 69
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The danger for society is when big players in an industry (as with the banks) play too much and create systemic risk that threatens all aboard.
I know, thanks for the update, but I think the topic here is not macro economics, but a strike in Berlin.

Negotiating contracts, treatment of employees on one side, and a company's ability to hedge fuel on the other, are not really that closely related IMHO. Naturally, any management tries to get the best deal on both, but that's about where the similarities end.

p.s. if there were any similarities on management's competence, then negotiating a contract should be a slam dunk for the unions if you're using the fuel hedge situation as a benchmark!
Doug the Head is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2009, 10:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SW France
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed Doug The Head, lets get back to original point of the post.

But some good discussion there for a bit!
juniour jetset is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 04:15
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,208
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
SouthWest Airlines has consistantly been on the right side of fuel hedges. They also have the lowest total executive compensation of any US airline and the highest paid narrow body aircrew (front and back). They have been consistantly profitable over the last five boom and bust airline cycles. History has amply demonstrated that airline long term success starts with competant management. Long term failure usually started with squeezing the T & C's.
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2009, 04:33
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to disagree over the fuel hedging debacle. There is no dispute that fuel hedging is a gamble - if it was a science rather than an art it would be easy. The key point, however, is that every airline in Europe had the same information available to them and for whatever reason easyJet made the biggest mistakes. As an independant accessor, The Daily Telegraph costed those mistakes at over £300 million- whatever the real figure, we can all agree it is a shed load of cash. The simple fact is easyJet management blew it when most of their main competitors got it right. I have yet to hear of a single resignation over this vast error or even a sniff of an apology. Plenty of bonuses though.

This is not off-topic as the fuel hedging debacle and the scale of associated losses give some measure of the relative sums of money involved. If you take the company at its word, and I don't, they are saying that all the pilot pay claims for this year add up to a maximum of £5 million - including sorting the German contract. That is as nothing compared to fuel hedging and is well-afordable given the extra £100m they expect to get back from no fuel hedging this coming year.
Alexander de Meerkat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.