Hong Kong 49ers obtain justice, at last!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hong Kong 49ers obtain justice, at last!
Eight years ago, Cathay Pacific Airways management behaved disgracefully by arbitrarily firing 49 pilots; professionals, as it turns out.
Today, the High Court in Hong Kong mauled Cathay Pacific Airways for the abysmal way it treated these employees.
It may be a very old industrial dispute to many on this forum, but to those to whom it mattered, please visit the 'search' function on Pprune for a history of this sorry saga, or visit the Cathay Pilots Union website - the Court transcript of 'day 7' is a gem to read - to discover how these brave souls, or at least most of them, obtained justice, at last.
Alternatively, Google 'Warham Cathay Pacific' in 24 hours time for a 70 page indictment of the managerial practices of Cathay Pacific Airways.
'RM
Today, the High Court in Hong Kong mauled Cathay Pacific Airways for the abysmal way it treated these employees.
It may be a very old industrial dispute to many on this forum, but to those to whom it mattered, please visit the 'search' function on Pprune for a history of this sorry saga, or visit the Cathay Pilots Union website - the Court transcript of 'day 7' is a gem to read - to discover how these brave souls, or at least most of them, obtained justice, at last.
Alternatively, Google 'Warham Cathay Pacific' in 24 hours time for a 70 page indictment of the managerial practices of Cathay Pacific Airways.
'RM
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: heads down trying to figure out Chinese RVSM
Posts: 200
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Esher, Surrey
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Associated Press
HONG KONG—A Hong Kong court has ruled that Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. unfairly fired 18 pilots amid a labor dispute in 2001 and ordered the airline to pay the former employees more than US$7 million.
The 18 pilots were among a group of 49 fired in July 2001 when Cathay's main pilots' union and management were locked in a dispute over wages and scheduling. The union launched a "work-to-rule" campaign, discouraging members from working beyond the terms of their contracts.
Hong Kong High Court Judge A.T. Reyes said in a ruling Wednesday the 18 pilots were unfairly dismissed and wrongfully terminated.
He said Cathay executives also defamed them by publicly accusing them of disrupting the airline's operations.
The judge awarded 17 of the 18 plaintiffs 150,000 Hong Kong dollars (US$19,350) each for unfair dismissal, a month's pay each for wrongful termination and HK$3.3 million each in defamation damages.
Cathay Pacific spokeswoman Carolyn Leung said she was still studying the ruling and had no immediate comment.
HONG KONG—A Hong Kong court has ruled that Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. unfairly fired 18 pilots amid a labor dispute in 2001 and ordered the airline to pay the former employees more than US$7 million.
The 18 pilots were among a group of 49 fired in July 2001 when Cathay's main pilots' union and management were locked in a dispute over wages and scheduling. The union launched a "work-to-rule" campaign, discouraging members from working beyond the terms of their contracts.
Hong Kong High Court Judge A.T. Reyes said in a ruling Wednesday the 18 pilots were unfairly dismissed and wrongfully terminated.
He said Cathay executives also defamed them by publicly accusing them of disrupting the airline's operations.
The judge awarded 17 of the 18 plaintiffs 150,000 Hong Kong dollars (US$19,350) each for unfair dismissal, a month's pay each for wrongful termination and HK$3.3 million each in defamation damages.
Cathay Pacific spokeswoman Carolyn Leung said she was still studying the ruling and had no immediate comment.
Controversial, moi?
Your opinion may or not be valid regarding the gentleman concerned but having read a good deal of the judgement and the transcripts it was plain that Cathay management were using the industrial dispute to sack those they saw as causing them the most grief, perhaps settling old scores at the same time, with the aim of scaring the remaining pilots into buckling under to the craven management's aims.
I dislike unions per se but recognise they are a necessary evil and have been a career long member of BALPA but I cannot help but feel the victimisation and intimidation and the loss of job and, for some, career was the action of a vindictive, unpleasant and downright nasty management. The judgement was fully justified but I doubt it in anyway fully compensates for what the 49ers went through. In the future I am sure many pilots will benefit from what they doggedly pursued all these years.
Well done them.
I dislike unions per se but recognise they are a necessary evil and have been a career long member of BALPA but I cannot help but feel the victimisation and intimidation and the loss of job and, for some, career was the action of a vindictive, unpleasant and downright nasty management. The judgement was fully justified but I doubt it in anyway fully compensates for what the 49ers went through. In the future I am sure many pilots will benefit from what they doggedly pursued all these years.
Well done them.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
doing the math...
Doing the math on this, I'm not sure the pilots were even made whole, much less punitive damages applied. If they got jobs immediately after being sacked then its a windfall, otherwise I dont see it as much as a win.
It seems they got 'closure' more than 'justice'
It seems they got 'closure' more than 'justice'
18 Wheeler, the issue at stake was not for what they were fired, but how and why they were fired. Also, some members of the Star Chamber that selected their fellow pilots for dismissal were also unpleasant to fly and simulate with. One, who is no longer with Cathay Pacific, is known as The Screaming Skull.
''Justice is when they collect, expect CX to drag this out on appeal until the 49'ers are old and gray.''
I'm not convinced they will. This is a landmark case in Hong Kong labour law - it's groundbreaking. I suspect that the deliberations over the verdict were discussed long and hard at the highest levels and the decision to award the case was not taken lightly. CX will realize that an appeal will proabably fail.
I'm not convinced they will. This is a landmark case in Hong Kong labour law - it's groundbreaking. I suspect that the deliberations over the verdict were discussed long and hard at the highest levels and the decision to award the case was not taken lightly. CX will realize that an appeal will proabably fail.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: York International
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CX welcome the verdict
Maybe just dreaming here but wouldn't it be a great day for us all if management accepted the verdict or even welcomed it as a way of finally laying things to rest. An appeal would only serve to keep the wounds open.
I for one hope that they are man enough to recognise that the whole episode was a huge error of judgement.
I for one hope that they are man enough to recognise that the whole episode was a huge error of judgement.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dream on...
Fly747
Nice thought but I seriously doubt that management would welcome the judgement. "A sign of weakness" is a phrase that springs to mind....
That said, maybe this will be the catalyst for a new phase of co-operation and negotiated deals that will benefit both sides - or am I dreaming too??
STP
Nice thought but I seriously doubt that management would welcome the judgement. "A sign of weakness" is a phrase that springs to mind....
That said, maybe this will be the catalyst for a new phase of co-operation and negotiated deals that will benefit both sides - or am I dreaming too??
STP
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Langata, Kenya
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well he refused to follow company SOP's, his method of getting people to do things was to shout at them, no-one wanted to fly with him, etc.
That enough?
That enough?
Ok, so that's one individual out of 49. Any comment on the other 48?
The Reverend
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
18 Wheeler;
[QUOTE]The guy is not fit to command an aeroplane.[QUOTE]
I admire your courage to post an opinion like that. It might well bite you.
[QUOTE]The guy is not fit to command an aeroplane.[QUOTE]
I admire your courage to post an opinion like that. It might well bite you.