Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Aerolineas B737 Rapid Decompression

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Aerolineas B737 Rapid Decompression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th February 2002 | 13:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Post Aerolineas B737 Rapid Decompression

Another website is reporting that an Aerolineas Argentinas Boeing 737-236(A), LV-ZRE, suffered a hole the foreward fuselage near the cabin door causing rapid decompression. Apparently this happened on 18/2/02.

Any further details/pictures of this incident?
MFALK is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 14:09
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
From: southern england
Post

Aviation Safety site always a good starter for 10! <a href="http://aviation-safety.net/database/incidents/20020218-0.htm" target="_blank">http://aviation-safety.net/databas e/incidents/20020218-0.htm</a>

[ 24 February 2002: Message edited by: newswatcher ]</p>
newswatcher is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 14:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: western europe
Post

delivered in Jan 1985 .... not that old!
hobie is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 15:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: DARLINGTON
Angry

It was also ex-BA,how good is their maintenance???? <img src="confused.gif" border="0"> <img src="confused.gif" border="0"> <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
DIRECTTANGODELTA is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 18:42
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: UK
Post

DirectTangoDelta would you care to elaborate on your comment. Are you inferring that BA maintenance is to blame. If so please present some sound evidence? It amazes me that someone uses such a thread to start yet another BA bashing campaign.

I'm quite happy to put my life in the hands of BA maintenance every day and proud of it !!
HomerJSimpson is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 18:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Kagerplassen
Post

Think the post about the BA-maintenance a bit odd and a bit wrong as well... I've had a hole in a almost-brand-new 320 once after landing, had NOTHING to do with maintenance, but everything with a stairs-driver who didn't trust himself enough to tell us flight crew he had crashed his airstairs into the fuselage.

Not liking BA is one, producing nonsense here is something else.

[ 24 February 2002: Message edited by: Pegasus77 ]</p>
Pegasus77 is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 18:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: BAH HUMBUG
Post

I took Directtangodelta's comment to mean how good is the operators maintenance as the aircraft is ex BA and would have been in decent nick when sold on.
flybhx is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 19:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Kagerplassen
Post

Good point, flyhbx... didn't look at the post from that point of view.

But still... don't think such a hole has anything to do with maintenance.

[ 24 February 2002: Message edited by: Pegasus77 ]</p>
Pegasus77 is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 21:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: DARLINGTON
Unhappy

To put the record straight,I meant Aerolineas Argentinas maintenance and not good old BA!!!. .Looking at the damage it seems like a structural failure around the floor area.Having seen them in operation they do throw them around (ala Ryanair)and also do short sectors covering many cycles.
DIRECTTANGODELTA is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 23:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Post

The thread title sure seems odd to me *rapid* depressurization??? I think not. From the looks of the hole it might be nothing more than a leak and a failure to hold pressure at the worst. I bet the passengers never even knew there was a problem unless the crew told them what it was.
Al Weaver is offline  
Old 24th February 2002 | 23:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Wet Coast
Post

From the lower photos, the hole seems to be about 3" by 6". Bit more than a leak I'd say. Doesn't look much like a 'crack' (as reported) either, notice the skin still attached at the top. I know little about the 737 external structure, but it doesn't seem to have occured at a panel joint.. .Bump from ground equipment earlier ??
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 25th February 2002 | 00:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: western europe
Post

Just to re-assure Direct xxxxxxxxxx ....... any "Airline Accident Ratings" that I have seen put Aerolineas Argentinas in the top Quartile - "Grade A" in fact
hobie is offline  
Old 25th February 2002 | 06:28
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: USA
Post

According to chilean press reports ( the flight was Santiago - Buenos Aires) passengers informed that the plane descended rapidly and oxygen masks were deployed.
pelican larry is offline  
Old 26th February 2002 | 07:41
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Angry

...Why point the initial, accusative finger at anyone's maintenance anyway ? BA's or Aerolineas ? Easy prod is it not and likely totally groundless
nilnotedtks is offline  
Old 26th February 2002 | 15:03
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 262
From: Blighty
Post

It looks like the hole is either at the extreme fwd end of the cargo hold or aft of the E & E bay.. .If it's the E & E bay then it is in a difficult area to inspect, and quite possibly could have been contaminated by galley/toilet spillage depending on the internal layout.. .From the photo, however it does look initially like the product of external influence. IE, ground equipment.. .By the way thanks for the vote of confidence re BA maintenance, it was always very good when I was there.

[ 26 February 2002: Message edited by: HOVIS ]</p>
HOVIS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.