Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Flybe Dash emergency at LGW?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Flybe Dash emergency at LGW?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jul 2009, 21:02
  #21 (permalink)  

Supercharged PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Doon the watter, a million miles from the sandpit.
Posts: 1,183
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why couldn't they land their crock of s**t at Manston and cause less disruption to everybody else?
Because, in language that even an idiot can understand, smoke or fumes in cabin and/or flight deck = land on nearest suitable runway. End of. Slightly more important than avoiding disruption to other people's travel plans.
G SXTY is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 21:30
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then why not Biggin Hill with Farnborough hospital just down the road and if airport fire cover were a problem then the local fire brigade would only take minutes to be on site.

To hell with engineering facilities compared to the costs to other operators of closing a major international airport with a diversion.
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 21:41
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If a pilot comes on and tells me he has smoke in the cockpit and wants to land at particular airfiled which I know is suitable for that aircraft type, he goes to that airport. End of. Being on board the aircraft, I'm sure he's in a better place than me to know what to do with his aircraft. If he asked to land at an airfield which I thought wasn't physically suitable I might make suggestions based on distance to nearest airfield, weather, runway length, or fire cover, for example, but If I tried to force him to go somewhere else because of the cost of closing a runway for an hour and he ended up in bits in a field near Reigate, I would be up sh!t creek without a paddle.

The one exception to this is LHR where we are discouraged from offering it as a diversion aerodrome for emergency traffic because of the risks involved in putting a defective aircraft over a large area of population. However, in practice if a pilot declared an emergency and wanted to go to LHR, all I could do is offer him alternatives. If he still wants to land there, he lands there.

Last edited by atco-matic; 24th Jul 2009 at 22:02.
atco-matic is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 22:05
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
then the local fire brigade would only take minutes to be on site.
If for example smoke entered the cabin and the source was unknown you don't know what you're dealing with (see valuejet). Look. People bitch and moan about blogs diverting to wrong place. causing disruption, etc etc. When you have an emergency all the seas should part. Never mind delays! The Press and pax can be forgiven for being that short sighted but not us as Pilots. The aircraft in question was ok but the same would be blaming the Pilots for not choosing a major airport with on Airport max fire cover and a huge runway, loads of emergency infrastructure and thorough emergency services contigency planning if a fire had consumed the aircraft and people had perished.

Last edited by Wireless; 24th Jul 2009 at 22:59.
Wireless is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 22:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Manchester
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes well done to the Flybe lads for getting it safely down on the ground, so what if they choose LGW or wherever else to divert, I would have done the same too, are some of these muppets on this forum for real?
Stellas is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 22:25
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Location
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spotters, amateurs and children .... please go away
AltFlaps is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 22:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lost
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Getting totally p1ssed off with being called a "Spotter"
I re-iterate, if the Pax and Crew have breathed in ANY sort of fumes/smoke then they almost certainly should have gone to hospital for a check up, regardless of the source of the contamination. It is just plain old duty of care in my book.

But then.....................

Money speaks louder than "Lip Service" A very sad world we are all now living in.

BR.
Bad Robot is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 22:31
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well to be honest they'd still close the rwy with a pax evac on the exit taxiway I'd think, and if you're on masks with smoke are you really going to be thinking of vacating and keeping the rwy clear to allow other folk to make an approach. I'd agree if OEIO landing to vacate but not fuz smoke/ suspected fire. You don't dick around there. On ground. Off, people ok....egg on face public Pilot website armchair pondering later
Wireless is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 22:32
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing 77W - Manchester Airport, August 1985

Why put 46 passengers more at risk when you can just stop ASAP on the runway and then get the hell out of it. The Manchester disaster took only 60 seconds for the fuselage to be totally destroyed.
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 22:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm starting to wonder about us as Pilots . We seem more worried about rwy occupation and hold ups than dealing with an emergency. That is presuming of course people posting criticism aren't just armchair sim dudes.
Wireless is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 22:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In one's Sim checks would you win favour if, with a smoke, poss fire emergency you decided to taxy about clear of rwy or diverting to a p**s small airfield with local public fire cover (that may be putting out burning haystacks) to avoid delays at "Big old Gatwick". Doubt it

Last edited by Wireless; 25th Jul 2009 at 07:03.
Wireless is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 22:44
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: crawley
Age: 74
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To all concerned

Forget your drinks party your friend diverted to BHX


This Aeroplane had an emergency which required an immediate landing which the crew undertook.


Does it matter how many aircraft were diverted to any airfield the Crew did exactly what they are trained for I E Land ASAP

It is with regret it caused the Airport to Close but what do u say to the Crew when they declare an Emergency


OH I SO SORRY WE HAVE OTHER AIRCRAFT WITH PASSENGERS ATTENTING COCKTAIL PARTIES SO U CANT COME HERE.


The Crew were very proffesional in what they did


So Please WHINGERS Go Away and Knock some other Airline or are FLYBE the only Airline to have had to Divert with Smoke..

Why is the D8 a crock of SxxT are u an expert if its a crock of SxxT why have DHC sold so many

Go away and play with your Toys Pathetic Person

I am surprised this thread has gone so far


Moderator

Please close it its Pathetic no lives Lost no damage to A/C I am sure it was something or nothing and it will probaly be flying again very soon


There we go I have said my lot




Good Evening
learjet50 is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2009, 23:30
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Flybe Pilots did great job, plane on ground, passengers safe.

Some people delayed but Big F Deal.

Lots of people not having to explain daddy or mummy is dead because some idiots didn't want to be late so plane with problems had to find somewhere else to land but crashed into a field.

Given thunderstorms over Gatwick later in afternoon I guess they were delays anyway.
racedo is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2009, 00:37
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In a control room with no radar...
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 5milesbaby
Boeing 77W - Manchester Airport, August 1985

Why put 46 passengers more at risk when you can just stop ASAP on the runway and then get the hell out of it. The Manchester disaster took only 60 seconds for the fuselage to be totally destroyed.
Well said that man.

How about we arrange for smoke to fill a cabin and chuck you lot that are whinging in it. See where you'd like to go from there.
Scott Diamond is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2009, 01:22
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Started work at 1pm to fly to SPU.
Delayed 3 od hours due to an emergency compounded by weather in the area.
This sort of thing can happen any day, any time.
Everyone gets home safely, that is our job, that is what matters. Nothing else.
Good Job Guys
oomje is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2009, 01:35
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I thought Manston had a nice wide and long runway suitable for emergency landings on foam for aircraft with collapsing gear?
Manston does still have a nice wide and longish runway suitable for emergency landings, but it lost it's foam carpet capability back around 1982/1983. There was no funding available to replace the RAF's foam tankers which had been corroded by the urea used to create the foam. I believe there were also environmental concerns for when it drained off into the water table.

At that time, I think the only other available airfield for foam landings was then CDG.

With regards to using LGW. Wouldn't it have been so much easier on all concerned if LGW had had a second runway to enable them to rapidly continue operations instead of causing chaos and 3 hour + delays.
Out Of Trim is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2009, 04:47
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London, Berlin, Bucharest
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
either we have alot of spotters around in here or we have ourselves a few trolls......
Nashers is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2009, 08:08
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 24/7 Hardcore Heaven
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bloody nuisance as my partner will be 3 hours late from Vienna and will miss half the concert tonight!
Why couldn't they land their crock of s**t at Manston and cause less disruption to everybody else?
You are a tw*t.

From an ATC perspective , yesterday was the worst day i can remember having at work for a very long time. Top job done by all, pilots and ATCOs.
mr.777 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2009, 08:29
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Gatwick
Posts: 479
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think ATCOs at Swanwick and the LGW & LHR towers did a fantastic job yesterday--the storms were really bad around here in the afternoon-and this didnt help at LGW after the earlier emergency,but an excellent job was done all round(Traffic was still going in and out of LHR way after midnight!!!)
We should be proud of our ATC here in the UK
Charley B is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2009, 08:39
  #40 (permalink)  

Supercharged PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Doon the watter, a million miles from the sandpit.
Posts: 1,183
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm surprised no-one's suggested Headcorn or Shoreham yet.

Fortunately, I've only ever had to use O2 masks in the sim, and it's not something I'd ever want to do for real. For those who have never had the experience (and judging by some of the comments here, that covers many of the 'contibutors' to this thread) it's an unpleasant and disorientating experience, and one that makes effective communication extremely difficult. And that's in the sim - never mind the real aircraft.

I say again - smoke and/or fumes in cabin and/or flight deck = land on nearest suitable runway. Briefing and setting up for an approach to an unfamiliar airport is a complication you can do without when it's an effort just to talk to each other.
G SXTY is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.