Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A320 'severely damaged' at IST

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A320 'severely damaged' at IST

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 10:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 'severely damaged' at IST

It happened while the Airbus was pushed back from the gate, when it however deteched from the pushback vehicle. It ran rearwards until it hit a lampost with force causing heavy damage to the tail and left stabilizer. There are no reports about serious injuries...
Referring to pictures, it seems that Atlasjet may have lost its first A320.

check 'news' section at

J.A.C.D.E.C. - Jet Airliner Crash Data Evaluation Centre

cheers
readywhen
readywhenreaching is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 10:34
  #2 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,094
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The bad news is that unless you have engines running, if you are travelling backwards and apply the brakes the aircraft will, likely as not, sit on it's tail, the only cure is forward thrust, which these guys probably didn't have.
parabellum is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 10:51
  #3 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who comes up with this nonsense about 'total loss'? Damage is superficial only! Any decent car repair shop could fix that. I would give it 2-3 weeks outside, rear pressure dome damage slightly more, but a loss? I don't think so. New stabiliser, tailcone (unimportant, non load bearing), APU....back on the road in less than 3 weeks! Does anybody seriously think the repairs to this shunt exceed scrap value of the aeroplane?
Rainboe is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 10:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I missing something, I can't see a report or any photos on that site.
Fargoo is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 10:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JACDEC - Current News


Fargoo go here 3rd item down
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 11:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The bad news is that unless you have engines running, if you are travelling backwards and apply the brakes the aircraft will, likely as not, sit on it's tail, the only cure is forward thrust, which these guys probably didn't have.
been there, done that, but got no t-shirt

A321, full load, shear pin failed during push back, no engines running.

If you apply brakes very carefully you have a good chance to stop the beast within a few meters without tail contact.
hetfield is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 11:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JACDEC - Current News


Fargoo go here 3rd item down
Thanks for that link

Doesn't look too bad to me, can't see it being a total loss. I'd give it a bit more than Rainboes local garage fix though
Fargoo is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 11:57
  #8 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nonsense! A few new panels, and nothing a good Sears pop rivet gun and a bit of car body filler can't fix!

I discovered some bastard has already done that to my car! Nice paint job though.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 15:02
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just make sure they use a double line of rivets if they're fixing the rear pressure bulkhead... Doesn't look too bad, I'm sure some of the catering truck incidents have done worse than that. If they can patch up the Gimli Glider and G-VSKY after landing with less than the regulation number of wheels, and the Swiss RJ at LCY, I'm sure they can fix this one.
llondel is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 15:08
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never mind the airbus, what about the old DC-3 reported below it! Cut in 2 by a hand grenade....
dubh12000 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 15:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like Hetfield said, you can stop the aircraft but you have to be very gentle
on the brakes or you will set it on the tail...had it happen on an icy ramp, with chocks in and engines off...ramp had a slope to it and the aircraft started rolling...just applied brakes very gently and the aircraft stopped.
Iceman49 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 15:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nairn, Highland
Age: 85
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to be a Line Training Captain on F27 Friendships based at Leeds/Bradford.

The beginning of R/W 32 at LBA was (maybe still is) decidedly uphill. It was a trap for the unwary, especially in strong headwinds. I would brief to apply at least some power before releasing the brakes for take off with the added comment that if it did roll backwards, DO NOT USE BRAKES but catch it with power.

In an earlier part of my career when I flew C130 Hercules, it was standard procedure after a reversing manoeuvre to stop the rearward movement with power and NEVER with brakes.

Jack Harrison
jackharr is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 16:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hadlow
Age: 60
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, they may need to flatten out a few baked beans tins to get material for the patch!
Super VC-10 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 16:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speed tape will fix that right up.
captjns is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 17:10
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Overseas
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have to say I don't think the tipping problem is as big as you might think. I've had this happen twice (320 & 319) and have spoken to 4 or 5 others on various types (744, 75/6) - all of whom stopped with judicious use of the brakes.

Sure, using the park brake to stop might do it, but does anyone have actual proof of an a/c ending on it's tail after a pushback problem? If it's such a problem, and shearing of pins happens fairly regularly, why have I never seen/heard of it happening?
52049er is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 17:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Elysion
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Using the parking brake.

It happened to me once many years ago. After push-back the tug was disconnected without telling me, so, as the apron had a noticable slope, the aircraft started rolling backwards. At this point I already had my hand on the parking brake handle waiting for the signal from the ground to set it.

For some reason I looked out the side window and notice we were moving backwards and, as a pure reflex, pulled the parking brake handle. I can tell you as the nose came up there was a lot of 'Oh crap' being recorded on the CVR.

It seemed to take forever for the nose to drop again. A very uncomfortable feeling I can tell you.
Conan The Barber is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 17:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northampton
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a good one in the early days of the A320. Pushing back, shear pin broke, A/C kept going back, pilot said merde and applied the brakes, nosewheel left the ground. Computer said "we must be flying" and applied full power as we are to slow, you can finish the story!
rogerg is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 17:49
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kelsterbeach
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And yet another thread going to waste by people posting utter rubbish on the A320 who propably have yet to set a foot in its cockpit:

There was a good one in the early days of the A320. Pushing back, shear pin broke, A/C kept going back, pilot said merde and applied the brakes, nosewheel left the ground. Computer said "we must be flying" and applied full power as we are to slow, you can finish the story!
Alpha floor protection (as it is called on the Airbus) is inhibited below 100' RA, as the crew of the A320 in Habsheim found out, and right at the beginning of the A320 ops that was, too!
Reimers is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 18:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You beat me to that one!
SFCC is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 18:14
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Omokoroa, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DC3

In the link above - just below the A320 entry - did you notice the Colombian DC3...

"NOTE: This accident marks the the 2nd Turbo DC-3 hull loss in Colombia within a day and the 4th hull loss of a DC-3 in 2009.(three of them were Turbo DC-3s)"

Someone is having an 'ANNUS HORRIBLUS'
chris.dever is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.