Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Continental TurboProp crash inbound for Buffalo

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Continental TurboProp crash inbound for Buffalo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Feb 2009, 22:56
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excellent video on tailplane icing. Thanks for posting that.
Flap 5 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 22:58
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Swindon
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight Safety: A useful post that is well worth a read to any aviator. well done
hungryhorse is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 23:01
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cambridge (the original one)
Age: 76
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Add a trim warning to the FMC ?

MungoP, Chesty : good points about A/P disengaging too late.

I wonder whether an FMC knows enough about AP and PFC output commands to have a "trim becoming unusual" monitor added to it which would warn the crew of, in this case, an extreme trim and approaching AP disconnect. You probably wouldn't want the additional code in the AP or PFC cos it would be an additional fault risk in a critical system.
Gegenbeispiel is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 23:10
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Herts, UK
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder whether an FMC knows enough about AP and PFC output commands to have a "trim becoming unusual" monitor added to it which would warn the crew of, in this case, an extreme trim and approaching AP disconnect.
That IS what you would want, and surprised if such warnings weren't built-in currently...
HarryMann is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 23:17
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The AP systems I'm aware of don't retrim in the roll axis, but simply hold the force with the servos. They monitor that servo force and pop up a series of escalating warnings if the force becomes higher than normal, before the servo has to disconnect. The pitch axis does retrim, and there's no warning from the AP if the trim has moved "a lot" - only warns if the servo is holding excess force, which usually means the trim has jammed or failed, and the servo is now doing all the work. The trim would only generate messaging if you got to the end of travel, if then.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 23:24
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just remember

if you move something and things go to hell, try moving whatever you moved back to where it was

from the idiot's guide to flying ;-)
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 23:29
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NASA video -- wow. Ten years old ...

two-tenths of a second, 40 degrees pitch down, 300' lost -- and that was the actual tail stall that occurred while they were in test flight intending just to creep up close to the problem! And the recovery procedure ....

Whew.

Is it time for little video cameras mounted on the tail, or something like that?
ankh is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 23:29
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cambridge (the original one)
Age: 76
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mad (Flt) Scientist: right, so the monitoring software would need to look out for both extreme trim positions and unusual, near authority limit actuator commands.
Gegenbeispiel is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 23:33
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Someone earlier in the day postulated a stall spin accident due to icing and configuration change, somehow the post was removed.

The Roselawn icing accident had similar pitch and roll excursions that began on approach when flaps 15 were selected. I realize that aircraft was an ATR, not a Dash.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 23:48
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Singapore
Age: 79
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming that tail icing is the culprit; I just wonder if there are any data's on record in respect of the tail configuration, i.e T tail Mid tail or a conventional tail.
bossan is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 23:48
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Moss
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No! On the Roslawn accident the F/O 'deselected' flaps! He had selected flaps in the holding to stay under max holding speed (Mistake!). When he got the clearence to descend, he forgot flaps and got a flaps overspeed warning. He then reduced flaps, and the roll upset begun.
empati is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 00:03
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No! On the Roslawn accident the F/O 'deselected' flaps! He had selected flaps in the holding to stay under max holding speed (Mistake!).
Yep, you're right now that I think about it. Anyway, the loss of control with the configuration change rang a bell when I heard that comms were lost in BUF at the marker.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 00:16
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PIRB
Age: 62
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dash 8 Crash

I am extremely sorry for the loss of life. But what is it about supposed professional Pilot training? Even as a lowly and humble PPL/IR, I have read, had instilled into me, and studied the effect of ice. In as much as if you are getting iced up, dont use the flaps , you recalculate the landing distance available and if its too short, divert, unless you are certain that the tailplane is not a problem. Which must be impossible in a Dash 8. If the facts confirm this, it is another totally avoidable accident. Other causes could be a midair, but then there would be a debris path, not a entire aircraft crashed into a single house, there is not a another rational explanation No doubt I will be vilified for this comment, as usual, and told to wait for the official report, but reports of ice on approach and then a sudden fatal dive just when they went for the flaps over the OM all adds up. I am flabbergasted how this can happen, yet again and again and again, remember people died.

The lawyers have already read all the comments, so mine are not going to make an iota of difference. In fact I hope they sue the airline out of existence

Last edited by dope05; 14th Feb 2009 at 00:40.
dope05 is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 00:20
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good video learning about tail stall due to icing

Lots of discussion following.

But how sure are we that it's indeed tailplane stall

Are there other possibilities with the information released to date?
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 00:49
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Ethereal Land of Vintage Aviation
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One Miracle, One Tragedy, all within 30 days.
That is a very profound comment.
V2-OMG! is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 00:55
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,409
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it will turn out to be tailplane stall, but remember the ATR crash was aileron reversal, not a tailplane stall. I am nearly certain the crash is ice related, but it may not be a stab issue. I am sure in time the FDR will reveal the source.
canyonblue737 is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 00:57
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Moss
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbubba!

"Anyway, the loss of control with the configuration change rang a bell when I heard that comms were lost in BUF at the marker. "

Yes! I, too, had a flashback after hearing that!
empati is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 01:00
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,409
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dope05:

every single day around the world airline aircraft fly into ice, accumulate ice, and land safely. q400's build ice on the wings, tail and the deice system removes it and they land safely. these aircraft are approved for flight into known icing. you can't simply say "well they had ice so why did they try to land, divert!"

it is very, very likely that the crew had seen icing like that many times and had no issues with it at all, but perhaps something unique happened this time and fate arrived and luck ran out... hopefully just like after roselawn we can learn more to prevent this in the future, but it will never be as simple as avoid icing because in our environment, we can't... we can only manage the situation.

Last edited by canyonblue737; 14th Feb 2009 at 01:33.
canyonblue737 is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 01:16
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Herts, UK
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it time for little video cameras mounted on the tail, or something like that?
I mentioned this in the Barajas thread for a quick check-see of a/c config (and other useful things)... but they would of course need heating and lighting .

I would hope all new design a/c are given a good complement of cameras, long overdue.
HarryMann is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2009, 01:28
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 349
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Let us not forget the possibility of crew fatigue, it was 22:00 hrs or something, how many sectors had they flown yesterday?.
I was on a late-day/early evening commuter flight into Albany, New York 3 years ago, the one Flight attendant looked tired and I asked her how many sectors they'd had that day, and was this the last.
It was the last of seven, thats a lot !!, that possibility, and bad weather, end-of-the-day.
Whatever the circumstances, a tragedy.
f
fleigle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.