Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Continental 737 Off Runway at DEN

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Continental 737 Off Runway at DEN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Dec 2008, 20:51
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wall Street Journal -Crew comment. Appears to be an RTO followed by brake problem:
Braking Problem May Have Caused Denver Runway Accident - WSJ.com
PlatinumFlyer is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 21:28
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
PJ2 - yeah I'll buy your map/photo interpretation for now. Photos, esp. older ones seems confusing becasue 34L was a recent addition so not all web pix are up-to-date (e.g. they show WC ending just past rway 34R and the firehouse is missing on some maps/photos)

Trying to work up a set of captions for our newspaper's website right now - from nothing but video stills that show very little context. Glad to have Prrune as an image resource/cross-reference (no quotes - I promise!)
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 22:30
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Message #42 looks as though they didn't miss a building (the fire station??) by very much.
seacue is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 22:35
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: still in bed
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"nice evaquation"

Nice evaquation?

I would say that: why the slides are detached?
have the crew secures the slide to the floor as procedures require?
Any injury occures becasue the pax had to jump out in the frozen ground?
ZAGORFLY is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 22:37
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: My Stringy Brane
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts



Machaca is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 22:41
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East of Texas
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice first thought Captain - isn't "pilot error" enough of a knee-jerk outside of our profession??

Last edited by Rapid D; 21st Dec 2008 at 22:44. Reason: spelin
Rapid D is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 23:16
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: london
Age: 41
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Taking in consideration airport elevation, wind direction, and the distance the a/c traveled i highly doubt they reached Vr.
It looks like a good jolt from that ridge just after WC. I`m surprised no casualties considering a/c had a considerate amount of fuel on board.
Airflight69 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 23:17
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slides

Nice evaquation?

I would say that: why the slides are detached?
have the crew secures the slide to the floor as procedures require?
Any injury occures becasue the pax had to jump out in the frozen ground
?

You're viewing photos from the next morning. The slides were obviously detached, probably by the fire department in order to facilitate getting into the aircraft to put out fire or by the safety team to obtain the data recorders. There is a ladder by L1.

From the photos it appears slides L1, R1 and the left window exit would have been used--since fire would have been on right side of a/c.

BTW, slides are armed prior to pushback from the gate on departure and upon arrival at the gate. Standard operating procedure.
MNBluestater is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 23:21
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the photo above makes much more sense
MNBluestater is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2008, 23:24
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fire station

Message #42 looks as though they didn't miss a building (the fire station??) by very much.

Seems like a stupid idea to me to put a fire station between parallel runways....
MNBluestater is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 00:23
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
Thumbs up Firefighter story

... firefighters train daily for situations like this one, but none of them had experienced it... They knew what to do: One group attacks the fire, another assists injured passengers, and another climbs inside the plane to search for survivors.

Cole, 37, clambered up the slide, which was already slick with foam that other firefighters sprayed on the plane, and he braced himself.

"I was expecting the worst," he said.

So was Benton, 55, who entered after Cole. "I took a little pause. I thought, 'This is going to be terrible.' "

It was black within. Cole, breathing through an oxygen tank, started down the aisle on his knees, groping with gloved hands for anything that felt human. Outside, firefighters aimed foam at the plane, and the spray blasted through the skin of the aircraft, dousing Cole in the face.

An obstacle blocked the aisle, so he started climbing over the seats, running his hands over cushions, patting luggage. What he feared most, he said, was that a child was unconscious under a seat.

Benton followed holding a thermal imager, a device that looks like a camcorder and detects body heat. He pointed it down each row of seats. Nothing.

"I was overjoyed," he said later. "Not a soul was on that plane."
On a Denver runway, a nightmare and a miracle - Los Angeles Times
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 00:27
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North America
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Message #42 looks as though they didn't miss a building (the fire station??) by very much.

Seems like a stupid idea to me to put a fire station between parallel runways....
On the other hand, how many passengers owe their lives to the rapid response of firefighters who didn't have to drive from the terminal area?

The fire station appears to be in the middle of the runways, not the ends. And who knows whether those earthen berms were intended to offer some protection from even a low risk mid runway event. Based on a risk/benefit analysis, probably low risk, high benefit. And in this case, even higher benefit with firefighters literally right there.
BreezyDC is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 00:34
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LONDON
Age: 51
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems like a stupid idea to me to put a fire station between parallel runways....
The postioning could have made all the difference in this instance given possible response times (although that would be speculating the fire station was manned at the time and the services departed from said building). I am not educated enough in airport/runway dynamics so will not comment further on that.

From the wsj article linked above it was suggested an aborted takeoff with brake problems - whilst this is speculatory and no indication was given as to why abort the takeoff - how severe a brake problem would need to occur for the plane to deviate in such a manner (considering one would expect the flight crew to do their best to counter any effects of a brake problem). Is the article just speculating and claiming to cite the pilots or is this indeed a possibility ?
Jofm5 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 00:46
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Not here
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to Reuters


Brakes looked at in Continental runway incident: report

They mean locked

Brakes looked at in Continental runway incident: report | U.S. | Reuters

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Braking problems may be to blame for a Continental Airlines flight running off a runway in Denver this week-end, according to an online report in the Wall Street Journal on Sunday.

On Saturday, a Continental-operated Boeing 737 failed to take off from Denver en route to Houston. The airplane subsequently ran off the runway, dramatically catching on fire, and leaving many of those on board with injuries.

The Journal, citing people familiar with early data gathered by investigators, said preliminary indications point to a braking malfunction..........
.
alph2z is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 01:07
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: newark
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumor has it

the problem started when the plane hit something on the runway which caused it to bounce up in the air and come back down...It looks like somebody took a blow torch to the right side of the plane right behind the wing.

These are the 1st pictures I've seen pf the right side pf the plane...

Denver plane skids off runway - Yahoo! News Photos here..
newarksmells is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 01:20
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Pure speculation, but worth thinking about for everyday operations:-
Rejected take off due to engine malfunction, asymmetric reverse, directional control problems in a strong crosswind.
Or
Reject due to ‘bang’ - tyre failure, resulting in braking difficulties and control problems in a strong crosswind.
Runway conditon - blowing snow?
PEI_3721 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 01:20
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming the Right engine failed prior to V1;

The Left engine still producing thrust would have caused the plane to yaw to the RIGHT requiring left rudder and possibly left brake to compensate.

As the pilot applied reverse thrust during the abort, the operating left engine would now produce a yaw to the LEFT.

If the pilot did not then apply RIGHT rudder and/or the RIGHT brake, the result would be the aircraft departing the runway to the left.

If the Pilot applied the right brake and it failed, it would have the same result.
TheMessenger is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 01:27
  #58 (permalink)  
See and avoid
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 690
Received 37 Likes on 21 Posts
At the risk of thread drift (or irritating people who know far more than I do...)

Cabin crew does wonders at briefing passengers who bother to listen. They CLEARLY helped get everyone out of the plane before part of it was burning.

Many of the facts seem to be lacking...

Please don't rip my head off if I ask if Cabin Crew can go above and beyond the standard emergency chute departure routine by asking a few healthy muscular passengers to catch fellow passengers as they reach the end of the emergency slide?

I assume most of the injuries and "broken bones" happened when people hit the ground trying to get away from the plane.

Looking at a few people with a steely-eyed gaze and telling them to make sure you assist these people exit safely by standing at the end of the slide to slow their fall (but run away if needed) might reduce injuries and give people hero moments to remember for years.
visibility3miles is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 01:36
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The wheel tracks in the snow are too close together to be main undercarriage legs.
Maybe a big tyre blow, and wheel rim drag tore off a leg?
chase888 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2008, 02:18
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
Let's slow down for a moment and think about the Fire crews entering a burning aircraft to rescue people!

I for one....tip my hat to those guys!
SASless is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.