Continental 737 Off Runway at DEN
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
protectthehornet:
Lot to be said for early training being in tail-draggers.
The rudder is often the least understood flight control...more training...more experience...better flying.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 777Yank
Perhaps we do need a placard next to the tiller explaining its proper use. The 737 operating manual says to hold light forward pressure on the control column and maintain directional control with the rudder pedals. Nowhere does is say to use the tiller until the rudder becomes effective. The rudder pedals will turn the nose wheel up to 7 degrees, if that is not enough to keep you on centerline, then you probably should discontinue the takeoff.
This is standard operating procedure, you will find it in the book.
This is standard operating procedure, you will find it in the book.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there is so much good stuff now on this thread...and it all seems to get ''back to basics''.
I think someone should take a movie of a 737...300 or later showing when the engines put out the power, the nose lifts up a bit...even on the ground....light on the nosegear.
I know many of you are out there and have watched planes take off in a crosswind and it staggers into the air with no crosswind correction...even being blown sideways as it gets light on the mains.
I wish someone would start a tv channel....nothing but takeoffs and landings at major airports.
I think someone should take a movie of a 737...300 or later showing when the engines put out the power, the nose lifts up a bit...even on the ground....light on the nosegear.
I know many of you are out there and have watched planes take off in a crosswind and it staggers into the air with no crosswind correction...even being blown sideways as it gets light on the mains.
I wish someone would start a tv channel....nothing but takeoffs and landings at major airports.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: US
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
J3 cubs properly flown have no problems with xwinds. An airliner properly flown should have even less problems with xwinds. I've never seen a problem with either with anyone I have flown with once they get to private pilot status.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: on the ragged edge
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Correction
Yes,
protectthehornet, 777Yank and others are correct,
I meant to say when "the pilot flying feels the [pedal steering] becoming effective", [not rudder], as in, after the turn into runway alignment. (wife was rushing me to bed).
My bad, thank you for the correction. Here is the statement corrected:
Another reader was questioning the literal "slight forward pressure" on the elevator, but at low speeds slight pressure is not going to do very much. It's a transition. Captain makes the turn onto the runway, while the F/O holds full down elevator. As the captain transitions to pedal steering and takes the yoke, he gradually relaxes the forward pressure towards neutral as the aircraft accelerates.
These are airmanship things that, before deregulation, old hands taught to new guys like me, even if it wasn't in the book.
I don't even like TOGA A/T takeoff procedures because if an engine stalls near target settings on the ice the pilot is less connected and less likely to notice it. I think takeoff power should be set manually most of the time, so crews stay current handling slow spools. A slow spool on the upwind engine combined with a gust over rudder limit can ruin your whole day. Maybe takeoffs on icy runways with high gusty crosswinds should see manual final power settings. That way crews don't get surprised if the autothrottles set a mis match.
But maybe I'm wrong on that. What do you guys think?
C.
protectthehornet, 777Yank and others are correct,
I meant to say when "the pilot flying feels the [pedal steering] becoming effective", [not rudder], as in, after the turn into runway alignment. (wife was rushing me to bed).
My bad, thank you for the correction. Here is the statement corrected:
Most jets the pilot not flying holds full down elevator on the roll to dig the nosewheel into the clutter a little better, (may make the tiller effective), then, once he gets the final power set, and pilot flying feels the pedal steering becoming effective, his hand comes off the tiller.
These are airmanship things that, before deregulation, old hands taught to new guys like me, even if it wasn't in the book.
I don't even like TOGA A/T takeoff procedures because if an engine stalls near target settings on the ice the pilot is less connected and less likely to notice it. I think takeoff power should be set manually most of the time, so crews stay current handling slow spools. A slow spool on the upwind engine combined with a gust over rudder limit can ruin your whole day. Maybe takeoffs on icy runways with high gusty crosswinds should see manual final power settings. That way crews don't get surprised if the autothrottles set a mis match.
But maybe I'm wrong on that. What do you guys think?
C.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
captain crunch is largely right.
we are getting out of the loop too much in everything. directional control on takeoff and landing is one of the highest criticality things we do. yet we have forgotten how to hold the rudder to the stop if needed.
and come on, anyone in Denver who isn't aware of wind is asking for trouble.
heck, our pioneers, the Wrights, went all the way from Dayton to near Kitty Hawk, north carolina just to get the winds right. And we are taking off with tail winds, huge crosswinds because we can't just say: tower, we request blank runway for takeoff or landing because its the right thing to do.
we are getting out of the loop too much in everything. directional control on takeoff and landing is one of the highest criticality things we do. yet we have forgotten how to hold the rudder to the stop if needed.
and come on, anyone in Denver who isn't aware of wind is asking for trouble.
heck, our pioneers, the Wrights, went all the way from Dayton to near Kitty Hawk, north carolina just to get the winds right. And we are taking off with tail winds, huge crosswinds because we can't just say: tower, we request blank runway for takeoff or landing because its the right thing to do.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Castlegar
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Earlier directives against TILLER-use
Messages #563 & 565 mention TILLER contribution to Lost Directional Control:
"... once ... aligned with the runway for takeoff ( or landing) you should not use the tiller...."
Several past mishaps, both T/O and Landing, have led to repeat AAR- discussions against use of TILLER: -- "Tower 41" / 20Dec95 B747-136 rwy excursion, RTO at JFK.... P. C. = captain's failure to reject the T/O in a timely manner when excessive nosewheel steering Tiller inputs resulted in loss of directional control on a slippery rwy; inadequate procedures for slippery rwy developed by Tower Air and Boeing; Contributed: inadequate fidelity of B747 training simulators for slippery rwy ops ...
-- AA102 / 14Apr93 DC-10-30, Landing DFW Rwy17L, excursion off-side \\AAR pg 106, Conclusions, Finding #13 ... captain failed to compensate for moderate crosswinds from the right, allowing the airplane to weathervane and drift off the right side of the runway with minimal rudder commands, inappropriate tiller nosewheel steering commands, and lack of forward pressure on the control column....
-- AA102 / 14Apr93 DC-10-30, Landing DFW Rwy17L, excursion off-side \\AAR pg 106, Conclusions, Finding #13 ... captain failed to compensate for moderate crosswinds from the right, allowing the airplane to weathervane and drift off the right side of the runway with minimal rudder commands, inappropriate tiller nosewheel steering commands, and lack of forward pressure on the control column....
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe takeoffs on icy runways with high gusty crosswinds should see manual final power settings. That way crews don't get surprised if the autothrottles set a mis match.
But maybe I'm wrong on that. What do you guys think?
But maybe I'm wrong on that. What do you guys think?
My main issue when I operate from slippery runways, is to make sure both engines accelerate the same. Getting both engines properly stabilized before pressing TOGA works for me. I think I will notice an engine stall even if I use TOGA.
Slow spools? I suspect some of you guys are more used to older generation engines?
No offense, of course
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As has now become the norm, the potshots have begun. Yes, after months of study there was a conclusion of pilot error (with contributory factors). But please put yourself in this pilot's shoes. He has seconds to react to what feels like an uncontrollable aircraft, in a scenario that the airline never trained for.
Please give the person a break.
There for the grace of, well, you know the rest.
What happened in this video (in flight) looks similar to the event (on the ground) at DEN. More time and leeway and visual clues for the DC-8 to react than the crew at DEN.
www.dc8.org
Please give the person a break.
There for the grace of, well, you know the rest.
What happened in this video (in flight) looks similar to the event (on the ground) at DEN. More time and leeway and visual clues for the DC-8 to react than the crew at DEN.
www.dc8.org
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
give the person a break.
something the airline didn't train him for.
we have all faced things we were not ''trained for". We cannot train for everything, but we can instill the sense of staying ahead of the plane. Of the highest degree of professionalism at all times, so that we are on an elevated level of awareness even on our worst day.
these are not potshots. these are thoughts of professional pilots. pilots who have faced winds, or ice, or other things and have held on.
over 16 years ago, I went to the head of the FAA, ended up seeing the deputy administrator and explained to that person that the controllers must give better and more timely weather information to pilots.
11 years ago I saw the administrator, jane garvey, on the same subject...and even mentioned how bad our security training was (cuba, cuba, cuba).
Was anything done? Was any improvement made?
Nope...and what did we have in the meantime. this denver bit with poor wind information and, oh yeah, 9-11.
And where was the continental pilot in question? Had he tried to improve things in our industry?
I doubt it.
something the airline didn't train him for.
we have all faced things we were not ''trained for". We cannot train for everything, but we can instill the sense of staying ahead of the plane. Of the highest degree of professionalism at all times, so that we are on an elevated level of awareness even on our worst day.
these are not potshots. these are thoughts of professional pilots. pilots who have faced winds, or ice, or other things and have held on.
over 16 years ago, I went to the head of the FAA, ended up seeing the deputy administrator and explained to that person that the controllers must give better and more timely weather information to pilots.
11 years ago I saw the administrator, jane garvey, on the same subject...and even mentioned how bad our security training was (cuba, cuba, cuba).
Was anything done? Was any improvement made?
Nope...and what did we have in the meantime. this denver bit with poor wind information and, oh yeah, 9-11.
And where was the continental pilot in question? Had he tried to improve things in our industry?
I doubt it.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: US
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hopefully when you get your first airline job you have had enough experience, 5,000 plus hrs and a lot of jet time to not need flying instructions. You need to know the equipment you will be flying but you don't need xwind instruction. You should already have had that mastered. At my airline you did, at least my first one.
Now we are getting low time pilots flying commuters with low time captains so for them this isn't true. Once in a while you get a pilot with the majors that can't fly too. I have watched some pretty badly performed approaches and landings wondering where he learned to fly. Some pilots are very mechanical and have no feel for their airplane.
A xwind landing isn't hard if you can feel what the airplane is doing and don't fight it. I used the J3 wing down land straight on every plane I have flown and it has served me well with no landings being memorable so it worked for me.
Now we are getting low time pilots flying commuters with low time captains so for them this isn't true. Once in a while you get a pilot with the majors that can't fly too. I have watched some pretty badly performed approaches and landings wondering where he learned to fly. Some pilots are very mechanical and have no feel for their airplane.
A xwind landing isn't hard if you can feel what the airplane is doing and don't fight it. I used the J3 wing down land straight on every plane I have flown and it has served me well with no landings being memorable so it worked for me.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: a shack on a hill
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A xwind landing isn't hard if you can feel what the airplane is doing and don't fight it. I used the J3 wing down land straight on every plane I have flown and it has served me well with no landings being memorable so it worked for me.
(...) planes take off in a crosswind and it staggers into the air with no crosswind correction...even being blown sideways as it gets light on the mains.
Biguns are different!
For you SLF and PPL guys: Keep in mind the lag in reaction time comparing e.g. 250to to 900kg.
Last edited by heavy.airbourne; 19th Jul 2010 at 05:20.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The wino at the end of the bar
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
heavy.airbourne
IŽll take the A340 any day in a gusy X-wind over the Metroliner/Merlin. Extensive experience on both and I hope I never have to set foot in the Merlin again , ever.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the merlin metroliner is a piece of crap...I hope I never see one again either. I don't like the way its built, the method of nose gear steering, or anything about it...and I am even giving the benefit of the doubt by letting it be the metro 3 or 4...the metro 2 is beyond crap.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC, USA
Age: 80
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
aileron use
Everyone sems to pretty much agree on the need for elevator downforce & rudder to maintain direction in this situation. What I haven't seen mentioned is the importance of into the wind aileron. In this case, it appears that about 1/2 wheel deflection was being held until "at around 90 knots he felt the rear of the airplane was slipping hard to the right and the tyres losing traction". At this point, he abandoned the correct aileron input & grabbed the tiller, which everyone agrees was useless. Increasing the proper aileron input to put more downforce on the upwind main gear would tend to stop this downwind drift & greatly aid in maintaining directional control. Any comments?
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: US
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the main gear was losing traction and slipping to the right wouldn't that mean not enough weight was on the main gear and the yoke was too far forward? We called it wheelbarrowing.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC, USA
Age: 80
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, because the graphs in the NTSB report show no down elevator was used although the 737 has a low thrust line & needs some down elevator on t.o. especially in a x-wind. At 90kts with a 45kt x-wind, I guess the relative wind would be about 30 degrees left of the nose, or almost directly on the leading edge of the left wing. The resultant lifting effect takes weight off the main gear leading to a downwind drift as reported by this crew. Aggresive use of aileron & resultant spoiler would counter this effect & maintain max downforce on the main gear.
Last edited by BobM2; 20th Jul 2010 at 02:58. Reason: wind angle
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: US
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bob, I agree with the 45 knot xwind they were in big trouble on a possible wet runway. Obviously the wind wasn't reported as such when cleared for take off. I have seen some extreme wind changes after a plane has been cleared for takeoff that would make it impossible to compensate for. The worst was a Senecca taking off in the south with a reported tornado approaching the airport, we put our Falcon 20 in the hangar because of hail reports. He took off and 30 seconds after he broke ground the headwind switched to a 40 knot tailwind. He was very lucky.