Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Continental 737 Off Runway at DEN

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Continental 737 Off Runway at DEN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 13:17
  #321 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps 'theron' could enlighten us as to the answer to his riddle - or has 'theron' not read the thread?
BOAC is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 14:13
  #322 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: russell, ky
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cross Wind

Some say the aircraft will weather vane into the wind. In this case to the left. Others say the left cross wind and gust will cause the aircraft to veer to the right. This should be a no brainer among professional pilots. Yes, the Wall Street Journal report is not official from the NTSB but based on what the pilots told the NTSB during an interview.
beechf33a is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 14:31
  #323 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but based on what the pilots told the NTSB during an interview
- BIG BUT - written by a journo, compiled by an editor and possibly mis-understood/quoted/guided? All the CORRECT info will be published soon. No need for the WSJ inputs. NTSB statements are sufficient.
BOAC is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 14:41
  #324 (permalink)  
airfoilmod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
WSJ

And the statements by the pilots to the NTSB were acquired by the paper how?
With all respect, commenting on anything from the press is useless. Amusing, but useless.
 
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 14:57
  #325 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Scotland
Age: 79
Posts: 807
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thereon's riddle

Believe he can only be referring to the rudder cocked left, whereas one might have expected it to be right to compensate for the crosswind. But it seems irrelevant: consider the effect on cabling, wiring and hydraulics of breaking the aircraft's back, not to mention uncontrollable body movement up front during the toboggan ride after the gear collapsed.
broadreach is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 15:01
  #326 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: russell, ky
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WSJ

BOAC
airfoilmod

Yes, you my be right. Where is your comment about the first part of my post #325?
beechf33a is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 15:02
  #327 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
Age: 62
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't the stabilizer look to be around maximum Aircraft Nose Down?
md80fanatic is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 15:09
  #328 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by beechf33a
Some say the aircraft will weather vane into the wind. etc etc
- there is another thread running on x-wind take-offs (one of many!), so please excuse the 'drift', but let's 'nail' this here and now to avoid further confusion on THIS thread.

While running along a reasonable runway surface, the a/c will wish to 'weathercock' into wind (in this case to the left) - that is how a/c are designed. With suitable steering inputs, initially nosewheel steering and then rudder, it will remain straight AND maintain the centreline without ANY need for aileron application due to rudder input and any gusts will only accentuate the yawing tendency. So, in the Denver case, we would expect a bit of right rudder on the runway, left aileron 'to taste' to stop the upwind wing lifting in the x-wind and that, sadly, is as far as we can go for this unfortunate crew.

Once it is airborne, it WILL tend to be blown downwind (with the air mass), counteracted by its 'yawed' angle into wind and should track the runway centreline again. Now it does not need the right rudder to counter the 'weathervane' force as it is no longer constrained by physical contact with the runway (now flying in a moving body of air), so it is normal to remove both the right rudder and the left aileron (known in the trade as 'crossed controls') in a co-ordinated fashion to leave the a/c in a balanced flight tracking the centreline but pointed into wind. .
BOAC is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 15:14
  #329 (permalink)  
airfoilmod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
beech

#325, First part? I couldn't agree more that xwinds are not mystifying and present no particular challenge to a well trained pilot. In this case, as someone said, BOAC? the wind issue I believe to be a red herring. Rgds AF
 
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 15:23
  #330 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Doesn't the stabilizer look to be around maximum Aircraft Nose Down?
can't a fitst responder simply walk up to one of these, lean on it and move it?
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 15:25
  #331 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 6nm N of LHR
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cross winds

Was at Denver that night. Don't recall the wind being especially gusty (in fact thought it was quite a nice evening when returning the hire car).
"Captain Speaking" said the flight had to wait as there was a problem with another a/c and that he would taxy to a quiet spot and switch off the engines". After some minutes, it was time to move and I watched out of the port side the flashing blue lights in the distance. Seemed an uneventful takeoff.
So perhaps the point about gusts being a major cause of the crash may not be borne out? Quite a puzzle though....
Roger
ex jump pilot is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 15:27
  #332 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as someone said, BOAC?
- certainly not me - I would hesitate to rule anything in or out with the info I have at the moment.

Regarding 'tailplane nose up/down', 'rudder left/right', slides missing - now these are most probably 'red herrings' indeed and should be ignored by the 'experts' here. DFDR and crew will tell all.
BOAC is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 15:31
  #333 (permalink)  
airfoilmod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
BOAC

My apologies, it was Fullwings.
 
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 15:55
  #334 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,848
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yes, it was me. To emphasise what I said, I think that the crosswind, as reported, would have had an *effect* but was unlikely to have been the main cause of the accident. Jet rudders are powerful beasts and all that would have been needed under normal circumstances, especially at near-flying speeds, would have been more application of the same to keep the a/c on the runway. It's not something pilots are likely to forget to do as it becomes a fairly reflex action, like steering a car or bicycle.

As far as the photo goes, I wouldn't read too much into control positions as many surfaces are free to float in whatever direction gravity/wind takes them when they are de-powered or lose hydraulic fluid through severing of lines. Only things that operate through jacking mechanisms stay in the places they were originally positioned and then only if the connections haven't been broken in the crash.
FullWings is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 16:12
  #335 (permalink)  
airfoilmod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Control position

At Pensacola in the sixties, a newly rated pilot landed gear up in his A-4. As the long slide came to an end he anticipated the investigation and thinks, select Gear Down.

"They'll never know, Right?" In front of the crash team the wounded Skyhawk shook,
groaned, and lifted itself up into a reasonable approximation of "A/C parked".

Gaming the investigation comes with its perils.


Obviously, this isn't the case here, and for the above reason, don't read too much into
a wounded bird. At least I won't, I leave that to better qualified people.
 
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 18:40
  #336 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It Has Been Moved

It is now relocated, but no word yet on the nose gear status.

This report is about 45 minutes old and has new photos.
http://www.9news.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=107055&catid=339
repariit is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 19:04
  #337 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the Old Folks' Home
Posts: 420
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Smile Not Likely

In front of the crash team the wounded Skyhawk shook, groaned, and lifted itself up into a reasonable approximation of "A/C parked".
Nice try, but no cigar. As a pilot with many hours in the Skyhawk, I can tell you, it didn't happen.
Smilin_Ed is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 19:08
  #338 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smilin_Ed,
"Se non è vero, almeno è ben trovato", no?
ChristiaanJ is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 19:21
  #339 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the Old Folks' Home
Posts: 420
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Don't Understand

Sorry, I don't understand that language.
Smilin_Ed is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 19:27
  #340 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Se non è vero, almeno è ben trovato",

Italian: even if it is not true, it is well conceived.
forget is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.