Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Latest news on Shoe Bomb (Non Political/Racial comments only)

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Latest news on Shoe Bomb (Non Political/Racial comments only)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Dec 2001, 18:42
  #1 (permalink)  

Keeping Danny in Sandwiches
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Latest news on Shoe Bomb (Non Political/Racial comments only)

Latest news in the Boston Globe on "Shoe Bomber" indicates that he did not act alone.
<a href="http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/360/nation/Bomb_suspect_has_possible_terror_link+.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/360/nation/Bomb_suspect_has_possible_terror_link+.shtml</a>
sky9 is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2001, 19:17
  #2 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

From MSNBC:


... sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that some prisoners under U.S. control said they recognized Richard Reid, also known as Abdel Rahim, as having attended al-Qaida training camps in Afghanistan.
Some of those who said they recognized Reid from photographs shown to them by U.S. interrogators remembered him as being “high strung,” the sources said.
If confirmed, Reid’s attendance at the camp would provide the first evidence linking him to bin Laden’s terrorist network.
Word of the reaction to Reid’s photo in Afhanistan came as new details emerged about the suspect.
Among other things, it was revealed Wednesday that Reid attended a London mosque at the same time as Zacarias Moussaoui, accused of helping to plot the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington.
Huck is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2001, 19:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I remember that 'Samsonite' suitcases and attache cases were favourite for smuggling plastic explosives in and I seem to recall (although I may be wrong) that some airlines banned them for a time. They are in regular use now. Are scanners so much better that they can detect anything in one of those cases?
Perhaps somebody like the Guvnor can enlighten me.
FFFlyer is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2001, 22:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Bath
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

There is something that I find confusing in this case. I'm sure there's a good reason, hope somebody can help explain it for me. All of the reports that I have read indicate that he will be charged with assault.

'The FBI said it would be charging Mr Reid, 28, with assault and intimidation of the crew of American Airlines Flight 63 from Paris to Miami. He is due in court on Friday' (From the BBC)

These charges seem sililar to those that might be brought for air rage incidents. Why no endagering an aeroplane, attempted murder, possesion of explosives etc.?

Ian
IanSeager is offline  
Old 26th Dec 2001, 22:15
  #5 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I think the initial arraignment was just to hold him in jail. Most likely a grand jury will be asked to bring federal charges of terrorism, etc...
Huck is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 01:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: CYTZ
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Better still, how about High Treason? He's a UK citizen who took up arms on behalf of the enemy during wartime, after all.
Squawk 8888 is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 01:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Would he not 'qualify' for one of Dubya's military tribunals ? If not, why not ?
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 02:13
  #8 (permalink)  
747FOCAL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I still want to know how he got throught it without at least a fat lip from an overly scared PAX.
 
Old 27th Dec 2001, 02:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: US
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

HUCK is correct. He was arraigned in the Magistrates Court on basic charges, pending a more detailed indictment that will be presented to the Grand Jury.

After the indictment, he will be arraigned again in the U.S. District Court. After the usual legal motions by the Federal Defenders, a trial date will be set.

"Give him a fair trial and then hang him!"
Check 6 is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 03:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: uk
Age: 63
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

What I find amazing is that someone who looks like him, with a one-way ticket and no luggage was even allowed on an aeroplane. If you asked anyone on the planet to come up with a stereo-typical portrait of an Mulsim fundamentalist terrorist, you'd get him! What the hell were the security people thinking of? <img src="mad.gif" border="0">
Vmike is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 03:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: right here
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

I wonder, what would happend when the guy got struck over his head and killed in the struggele?
Would the police charge somebody??
or is this self defence?
Ibis is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 05:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: london/UK
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

As regards to charging someone if he had been killed in the struggle. Don't know about US law, but under UK law (which someone could still be liable under if he is indeed a UK citizen) then very very unlightly. A person is entitled to use reasonable force in self defence. But it would depend on what the person doing the killing had in his mind at the time, if he were aware that this berk was trying to devide the plane and contents into thier compent parts, then no sane jury would ever convict....but then again, I never came across a sane jury! However this is all speculation as sadly no one did kill him, thus saving the expense and the possibility that 12 good men and true will believe he didn't have enough toys as a child ... and aquitt him!
bjcc is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 05:15
  #13 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Generally in the states one can use deadly force when one's life (or the life of another) is threatened. You generally have a duty to escape if you can; this rule does not, however, apply to your house - you can use deadly force to defend yourself in your house without having to try to run away first.

Many folks in my part of the country express themselves thusly: "I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6!"

Interesting, by the way, that they made it all the way to Boston. Was any other airport (Halifax, Bangor, etc....) closer? How did they know this guy was alone? Al Quaeda had previously sent groups of 5. If I were PIC I might have thought about dumping the cabin pressure and pointing it at the nearest runway....
Huck is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 09:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Remember the passenger who was asphxyated while being subdued on a Southwest flight. No charges were laid against the subduers in that case, and he didn't have exploding footwear.

On another front, according to <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/12/25/plane.investigation/index.html" target="_blank">CNN</a> the head of the firm doing security for AA at Paris, Reid was identified twice as a threat. French Authorities (whoever they were) decided he wasn't. But surely AA should have had the last word ?
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 09:30
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So much for the much-touted Euro security . . . even when put on extreme alert and having an individual flagged by the airline and sent for special screening. Pathetic.
Roadtrip is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 12:15
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Macedonia
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

If I had been a passenger on the flight, with a little private money, then I might just attempt to bring a private lawsuit, or better still, a joint lawsuit against the body of people responsible for putting my life in danger.
fair or not, we all know that force is the only way to ensure what may be costly changes required to security procedures currently in force.
In this case it may be their whole operations procedures that need to be revised, & revised right now!!!!!
See bee is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 12:44
  #17 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

MikeEcho,

Re Vmikes comments.

I don't find them at all offensive. Unfortunately for all the good minded, reasonable Muslims world wide the current threat is demonstably 'Middle Eastern Males of Muslim Religion'. This individual was identified as a possible threat, based on his looks and behaviour, and it turned out he was a threat.

When the Muslim world starts acting with some conviction to stop this madness, instead of a mix of 'dancing in the streets' and Govt responses along the lines "Yes it is terrible and we condemn these people" while secretly(and often not so secretly) saying, "But the Americans had it coming", then they(the Muslim world) will be able to hold their heads up in the world community.

Their Religion is being hijacked by criminals, but I don't see the sort of reaction that one might expect from the Muslim world community.

Chuck.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 13:43
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Uranus
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

MikeEcho,
I'm struggling to work out what your problem is..............

<img src="rolleyes.gif" border="0">
StressFree is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 17:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

For the record, Mr. Reid is reported to have an English mother and Jamaican father.
malanda is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2001, 18:14
  #20 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Ref: Vmike's comment...

Didn't anyone really think that someone travelling longhaul solo and without luggage was a cause of suspicion? The "way he looks" is pretty irrelevant. I know that customs here in the UK make extensive use of "profiling" people, and if you don't fit the profile, you get stopped. Example - I worked for a few weeks in Turkey, and travelling home was stopped by customs (as a single guy, coming in from Istanbul on a regular basis) almost every time. For the record, I am not Muslim, and have a typical European visage...
TwinAisle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.