Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

British Airways US Freighters

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

British Airways US Freighters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Apr 2000, 17:31
  #41 (permalink)  
spirit38
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Cargorat!
Are you working for Cargolux? If you are (or if you are not but know anyway), could you tell if they are recruiting now and what criterias they prefer and who to adress. Iīve tried to get info on the net about C.L but didīt manage to get it.

Wannabe Freight-Dawg!!
 
Old 18th Apr 2000, 17:58
  #42 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Spirit: http://www.cargolux.com/about/Default.htm
There is an online application form. Not really hiring at the moment, but give it a crack; who knows. 1500hrs min.

rgds Rat

[This message has been edited by CargoRat (edited 18 April 2000).]
 
Old 18th Apr 2000, 18:04
  #43 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

To Pan/SGC: Is this the new name of your company? I thought it was going to be simply SGC, though everyone still calls it Panalpina.
tks/Rat
 
Old 18th Apr 2000, 19:44
  #44 (permalink)  
spirit38
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Thanx Rat!
 
Old 18th Apr 2000, 20:38
  #45 (permalink)  
Panalpina / SGC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Rat,Swiss Global Cargo or SGC is part made up of the former ASB.It is a daughter company of Panalpina.It is jointly owned 55% Panalpina and 45% SAir Group.The former air division of ASB was incorporated into the new company.I am in the UK for now.
 
Old 18th Apr 2000, 22:48
  #46 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

SGC, fair enough. You know where I am from my profile. You also know that PAN/SGC have 100s of employees at ellx. Seems to me your company cannot make up its mind what to call itself. You will be Panalpina until you make up yr minds.
Yr handling agent in Lux is not quite sure what to call you...Please decide!\
rgds Rat
 
Old 18th Apr 2000, 23:18
  #47 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Greetins geh55,
sorry for not answering earlier. My understanding as follows:
N750SJ always operated for SAA - a superb aircraft (-200 series/very low OEW -7R engines with a -300 wing). It was flying SA6213; CPT/WDH VIT (LEVT) LUX (ELLX). Ex SIA?
PAN/SGC: I know one of your ex-Lux guys in PIK..

[This message has been edited by CargoRat (edited 18 April 2000).]
 
Old 19th Apr 2000, 10:22
  #48 (permalink)  
Panalpina / SGC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

rat,is he irish or swiss,either way he probably works for me.
 
Old 19th Apr 2000, 18:30
  #49 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Pan/sgc Irish (J).
 
Old 19th Apr 2000, 20:03
  #50 (permalink)  
DCBOE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

BA have 15 747-200 aircraft, shortly to be sent to the desert to rot away, all have D4 rollers and can do Hong Kong direct, 3 have even got frieght doors, and still people say there are no frieghters about?
 
Old 19th Apr 2000, 20:15
  #51 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

HKG direct on a -200 equates to about 45T gross payload. Not exactly a money winner. Conversions are heavy, don't have a nose-door, and often as not, no 377.8T increased mtow.
rgds Rat
 
Old 19th Apr 2000, 20:24
  #52 (permalink)  
Panalpina / SGC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wink

Well said Rat,we have to do fuel stops westbound ex lux when the -400 is on A chk and replaced by a -200.And thats just over the Atlantic.

You must mean Joe.If so then yes he works for me.
 
Old 19th Apr 2000, 20:27
  #53 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Yep, Joe it is - haven't seen his brother for a while now that I think of it. He also works for you guys.
 
Old 19th Apr 2000, 20:48
  #54 (permalink)  
Panalpina / SGC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

He is still in LUX.Got married last year to some polish girl.Joe is on holiday back to Ireland at the moment.Will pass on your regards when he gets back.Paul is working in the SGC office at LUX doing admin.
 
Old 21st Apr 2000, 01:30
  #55 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Attn Shot-One
Perhaps some appologies for going off-track from your original post.
Any comments from your side after the 50 something replies to your post? Awfully quiet from your side (Please confirm your not a whinging Nigel)
rgds Rat
 
Old 23rd Apr 2000, 01:22
  #56 (permalink)  
Akwah_Plain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Heard that BA have lost the waiver to use Atlas. Quote from DETR: "not exceptional circumstances."
 
Old 24th Apr 2000, 15:12
  #57 (permalink)  
ShotOne
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

sorry cargo rat I'm not ignoring you-just that rather boringly I have to go to work...and no I'm not a Nigel!

Events have overtaken the post as, thanks largely to a superb campaign by the Independent Pilots Association, the DETR (as akwah rightly states) have refused to allow BA permission to continue with this.

Although there has been some US/UK friction evident in this thread, this is a good decision for pilots on BOTH sides of the Atlantic. It is not in any of our interests to have a merchant navy style free for all.
 
Old 25th Apr 2000, 00:29
  #58 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Interesting discussion though.
Happy Easter & all that.
rgds Rat
 
Old 25th Apr 2000, 01:59
  #59 (permalink)  
WOK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Rumour control:

That one of BA's -236' to be sold to "Atlas UK" (presumably a fictional company).

The machine mentioned was XO - not one of the Combis but to the spec, sans door, and capable of 379,202kg MTOW.

Not likely, but possible.

Further rumour, not confirmed to me, is that a certain ex 747/777/SSC chief pilot to become involved with this alleged operation. I think that's a spoiler to stop anyone from BA wanting to work for the outfit.....
 
Old 26th Apr 2000, 02:46
  #60 (permalink)  
CargoRat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

You might find that 379.2 is max ramp weight for the -200.
ShotOne: Atlas is out, so that ends that part of the discussion. Now I have a question - haven't you (or the IPA) been a bit selfish? BA doesn't have a freighter fleet, and won't be able to be a viable force in the market in the near future - it takes time.
UK customers now have no choice but to put all their freight on a truck, and send it over to places like LUX/FRA/CDG/SPL etc etc where there are large freigher fleets operating. And believe me, thats exactly what is happening. The UK cargo that BA would have carried, IS being carried by the likes of Cargolux/Air France Cargo/Lufthansa Cargo/KLM - the list goes on.
I think your hurting yourselves in the long run. All that freight is a lot of jobs going abroad.
rgds Rat


[This message has been edited by CargoRat (edited 25 April 2000).]

[This message has been edited by CargoRat (edited 26 April 2000).]
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.