Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Security Theatre

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Security Theatre

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 17:23
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On Tuesday I flew from Gatwick as a pax on a USAir flight to Philadelphia. I passed through the first security check, without removing my shoes, and was patted down; the security guard also ran his hands over my shoes, which were soft. Good, I thought, removal of shoes was being dispensed with. But no, there was a second X-ray check further on, for shoes only. Arriving at the gate, I was politely asked by a security guard if he could inspect my hand baggage. He gave it a very perfunctory once-over. Then he asked me to remove my shoes! When I told him they had already been removed and X-rayed, he said that this second check was "for the airline". I asked him what had the earlier check been for, if not for the airline. He had no answer.
Rockhound
Rockhound is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 17:36
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fareham
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I could not help but notice a huge pile of crew bags stacked up in the foyer of an hotel adjacent to LHR yesterday evening. All totally unattended. The associated crew were in the bar (though not drinking), presumably waiting for their transport.

I assume this baggage would have been rigorously searched at LHR before the crew were allowed to board on the basis that it 'could have been interfered with'.

No?
Nipper2 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 17:44
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
On Tuesday I flew from Gatwick as a pax on a USAir flight to Philadelphia. I passed through the first security check, without removing my shoes, and was patted down; the security guard also ran his hands over my shoes, which were soft. Good, I thought, removal of shoes was being dispensed with. But no, there was a second X-ray check further on, for shoes only. Arriving at the gate, I was politely asked by a security guard if he could inspect my hand baggage. He gave it a very perfunctory once-over. Then he asked me to remove my shoes! When I told him they had already been removed and X-rayed, he said that this second check was "for the airline". I asked him what had the earlier check been for, if not for the airline. He had no answer.
Rockhound
I know something of the US Airways operation at LGW, and unfortunately for you Rockhound - The 1st lot of security - BAA are employed by the Airport Authority - BAA to follow UK Government Security Policy and Regulations.

On reaching the Gate - You were subject to Security employed by US Airways to FAA - US Government Regulations. A Separate company called ICTS. So therefore a double whammy.
Out Of Trim is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 18:48
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The implication being that they don't trust BAA to do this properly? I flew NWA via Amsterdam recently and whilst being questioned by G4S and unable to produce a ticket as I had used the code to check in online, I was NOT asked to remove my shoes. Left hand right hand let's see if we can work together and spell consistency.........

Have also seen Virgin pax at Heathrow having secondary questioning before boarding whereas BA have none and I don't believe for a minute BA have lax security....
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 19:09
  #45 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
You really shouldn't try to analyze what these people are doing any more than you can wish for the moon. As a couple of others have alluded to, airport security staff have one purpose ony - that is to provide the Government of (*insert your country here) with tangible evidence to the voting public that they are doing "something" about terrorism.

The Government doesn't care that it isn't effective or remotely useful, they only have to show that they are doing "something". Look at it from the Government's viewpoint;

1. Secures votes for demonstrating they are fighting terrorism.
2. Gives thousands of jobs to unskilled workers.
3. Keeps the educationally subnormal off the streets.
4. Brings the aircrew down to earth by treating them just like Joe Public.
5. Allows them to introduce random and arbitrary changes to the screening system to maintain the illusion of responding to terrorism based intelligence.
6. Generates additional revenue from usury based pricing in airport shops for all those things you can no longer bring with you.
7. Provides a perfect scapegoat if something does go wrong and something gets on board a plane.
8. Has single handedly revitalized the sock industry.
9. Provides a pre-screeing selection program for fascist bully boys for when the Government decides to use them to maintain civil order when democracy breaks down.

Who knew?
Two's in is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 19:37
  #46 (permalink)  

OLD RED DAMASK
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire born. In Cebu now
Age: 70
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's one on security/safety for you all. How is it in Europe we have to cope with plastic knives,forks and spoons but as soon as we get South of the Med and change planes, we can then be trusted to use metal once again????
Isn't this the area of the world where the terrorists come from???
lasernigel is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 20:16
  #47 (permalink)  

the lunatic fringe
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 67
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LHR - BKK: Metal knife and fork.

BKK - SYD: Plastic knife and fork.

SYD - BKK: Plastic.

BKK - SYD: Metal.

Too stupid for words.
L337 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 20:42
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
he said that this second check was "for the airline".
Whilst I get as frustrated as the next person by the constant trips though "security" lets not forget that it was a second check "for the airline" that prevented Nizar Hindawi from blowing up an El Al flight from LHR to TLV in 1986. The explosives were found in a bag, that he had given to his pregnant fiancé to carry, by security people at the El Al lounge.
Max Angle is online now  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 20:58
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Middle East
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes me laugh when the SS ask everytime "got any liquids". Why not also ask "got any semtex or box cutters"
mona lot is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 22:17
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: right here
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If Joe public would stay out of an airports for a while, using other means of transport, this nonsense would be stopped soon!
The commercial pressure would change there minds!
Just imagine the picture when from tomorrow the airports are empty and all the so called "security staff" hanging around and twisting there thumbs?
No car drives into the NCP, no business is done in the shopping mall "Airport".
What you think, how long would that be accepted before things will change?
BAA needs your money too, and as we know, money rules the world!
Ibis is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2008, 23:28
  #51 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
that prevented Nizar Hindawi from blowing up an El Al flight from LHR to TLV in 1986
There is simply no comparison between El Al security measures and the daily Circus that takes place at airports today.
Two's in is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 00:14
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: A332FDECK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's one on security/safety for you all. How is it in Europe we have to cope with plastic knives,forks and spoons but as soon as we get South of the Med and change planes, we can then be trusted to use metal once again????
Isn't this the area of the world where the terrorists come from???

Oooooh buddy, terrorists come from ALL corners of the earth...please do not generalize. Thank you.

I do understand what you're trying to say and most of us here ( south of the med...) are on the lookout at ALL the times....what can we do, some airlines here put inflight services ahead of safety and they conveniently "overlooked" on this matter!
geo7E7 is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 05:53
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the subject of metal cutlery, Virgin Premium Economy has metal. Mind you, the knives seem to be blunt...

It's a while since I've been there, but I do remember seeing razor blades for sale in the Gatwick departure lounge.
llondel is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 06:17
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take an oil stone with you :-)
cwatters is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 06:22
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Suffolk
Age: 80
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly took your advice Ibis......packed in being a "sardine special" at long last. Went to my destinations by ship. No more two hour journeys to the airport,three hour check-ins......then the security and flight.....and sat in seats that are......need I say more. Holiday was bliss this year.
Lancastrian is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 06:35
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody tried snapping the plastic knives Qantas gives you? The result is a darn sight more dangerous than a blunt, metal butter-knife!

Everybody knows it, nobody wants to admit it or do anything about it.

And please - no crap about how we shouldn't be telling the big, bad "terrorists" how to do things..... they've figured it all out by now.... if they really exist, that is!

Seven years on - can you really believe this circus is still playing and hasn't been run out of town yet??
Ron & Edna Johns is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 07:01
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Heart
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Security Circus sends a clear message to terrorists the world over. "You've got nothing to worry about as the authorities have no imagination!"

They may be keeping an eye on the ball but it is the wrong ball.
Miserlou is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 07:37
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find it all a farce, recently flew back from Phoenix to LHR, the TSA asked me to make sure my bag was unlocked and put it in the pile of bags waiting for screening.

The operator didn't seem too pleased when I waited around, and tried to move me on. I asked her who was guarding the large pile of unlocked luggage while she was screening to which she pointed out that she was, and that it was more secure!

Ahem, more secure how? Its an open area that anyone can walk in off the street and put anything into any bag!

Another classic for me was in JFK when I had locked my bag, and was told to wait while it was screened. I stood there like a lemon while they used bolt cutters on my lock because I "wasn't allowed to interfere with the screening process". Why make me wait to watch my lock getting destroyed, what an absolute idiot!

Its the same with UK arrivals now, the government deem that it needs to be more visible that it is protecting our borders, great, so now they just slow it all down and create massive queues!!! I normally use the IRIS at least when they are working!!

Rant over!
jethrobee is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 10:14
  #59 (permalink)  

OLD RED DAMASK
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire born. In Cebu now
Age: 70
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the subject of TSA locks. I work for an American company as an engineer,area as far as India.
TSA locks are there for security to gain access to my toolcase for inspection and then place the lock back. Now on my 15th lock in 18months. Are they making a collection of them???

Oooooh buddy, terrorists come from ALL corners of the earth...please do not generalize. Thank you.
Sorry but didn't mean that kind of generalisation.
lasernigel is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 10:21
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is simply no comparison between El Al security measures and the daily Circus that takes place at airports today.
I quite agree with you, it is a circus and it's not hard to see why some other authorities and airlines want to carry out their own screening.
Max Angle is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.