Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

The latest Dash-8 gear failure

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

The latest Dash-8 gear failure

Old 24th Aug 2008, 09:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oxford
Age: 49
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The latest Dash-8 gear failure

This happened 23 August past 5 pm local time at Barranquilla, Colombia.
The Aires flight was coming from Curacao.
It's the second such incident in Colombia n less than a year with a Dash-8.

Evacuation was efficiently carried out. No injuries.
Source in Spanish:
EL HERALDO
condorox is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2008, 10:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: France
Age: 50
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a Q400 - What went on here?

Hello,

That's a not a Q400 - so it doesn't immediately fall into the same category as the SAS incidents. Any further info on what happened here?

Different plane, different systems, different landing gear suppliers...
gearguy is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2008, 16:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Around the block
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it really?

I would not think that there are that many big differences- the basics are all the same.

Guess its just a matter of time before Quantas starts reporting troubble. Cross fingers they dont experience the same as SAS...
Viking101 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2008, 18:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Between LPCs
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is very little that is the same between the 300 and the 400. Especially the main gear!
Cutoff is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2008, 18:56
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does it operate in cold weather runways like SAS?
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2008, 19:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It generally is found that the operators that do not maintain their aircraft properly, regardless of type, have recurring mechanical problems.

It many times is just that simple.
Gosh, what an absolute surprise...
411A is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2008, 19:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: AMS
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Guess its just a matter of time before Quantas starts reporting troubble. Cross fingers they dont experience the same as SAS..."

Jeez...

...it's QANTAS and TROUBLE

fits perfectly in one sentence doesn't it?!
klm-md11 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2008, 22:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It amazes me that to this day, despite reports outlining the maintenance procedures of SAS with their Q400s, that people still 'link' any Dash incident in respect of their landing gear with the Q400 issue last year.

Could this one be an unfortunate accident?
Cloud1 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2008, 22:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SWE
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cloud1, which reports do you refer to?
Ladusvala is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2008, 22:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 5945'36N 1027'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's a not a Q400 - so it doesn't immediately fall into the same category as the SAS incidents.
No, but the 100, 200 and 300 also has a tendency to shear one of the links in the MLG when stressed above a certain level. And it's designed to do it too if I remember correctly. (Something about protecting the structural integrity of the wing???)
Wideroe has had 3 DHC8-100s on its knees IIRC
M609 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2008, 12:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I use the term 'report' as I could not think of any other word more suitable. Was it not confirmed that SAS maintenance procedures failed and therefore the aircraft experienced problems with the undercarriage?? funny because I thought this was and this has been confirmed across various forums...maybe I have missed something.
Cloud1 is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2008, 09:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cloud 7
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nope SAS maintanance was never faulted. The undercarrage was!
That is probably why Bombardier and BF Goodrich paid a handsome sum to SAS in damages!

Regards
Heavydane
heavydane is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2008, 09:40
  #13 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure the FDR readout would confirm a heavy landing.
HotDog is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2008, 10:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: @ some hotel far away from everything
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gear is the weakest link, meaning as M609 said, to give first. You certainly wouldn`t want the gear to pillar its way up into the middle portion of the engine, or...?

Any WX info for the airport? Runway seems dry, or at least damp, but that`s pretty much all I can see from the pictures.
Guttn is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2008, 12:06
  #15 (permalink)  
Dash-7 lover
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
British Airways Dash-8-311 G-BRYP

Same thing happened on landing at Plymouth - Right main gear collapsed after pin sheard after a heavy landing. Unable to locate pics though
 
Old 28th Aug 2008, 09:49
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Age: 52
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can the -8/Q-Series take the same rough handling / landings has say the DHC-7, which was a rough and short field specialist?

Steve
steve wilson is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.