Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

American Airlines to cut 7,000 jobs

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

American Airlines to cut 7,000 jobs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 10:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: FL 350
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post American Airlines to cut 7,000 jobs

American Airlines, the US airline which is close to seeking a merger with British Airways, has told staff thta it will cut 7,000 jobs by the end of the year, as it grounds aircraft in a bid to mitigate the impact of soaring fuel prices.
American said in a regulatory filing that it expected to record a second-quarter charge of up to $1.3 billion to account for the job reductions. It also plans to write down the value of the MD-80 and Embraer 135 regional jets that it is retiring as it eliminates flights, according to a report in The New York Times.

American Airlines to cut 7,000 jobs - Times Online


BA to seek clearance for AA and Iberia merger

British Airways is said to be close to seeking clearance from competition authorities for a three-way operational merger with American Airlines (AA) and Iberia.

The deal would allow the companies to combine nearly all aspects of their operations, including sales, purchasing and marketing, leading to lower costs and greater economies of scale. Legal sources in the United States said that a submission to the US Department of Transport was expected as soon as next week.
BA to seek clearance for AA and Iberia merger - Times Online
heli_port is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 10:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle
Age: 39
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ouch. Just got to hope none of them have the right to work here in the EU! Could make it even worse over here now.

Now really isn't the time to be spending £80,000 on flight training :-(
geordiejet is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 10:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a merger in the usual sense, but a marketing cooperation agreement, etc.
However, the 7000 jobs will go, and many older types of aircraft will be retired from the AA fleet.

As I own some AA stock, I have also written to the company suggesting that they cut costs further by outsourcing CC such as BA is proposing.

The AA pilots have already had their salary sliced down to what it should be, so no problem there, however their (the pilots) proposed salary increase of 53% should, of course, be rejected out of hand by the company...and most likely will.

The present fuel price shock is an excellent opportunity for all airlines to trim the fat from their business, including retiring older aircraft from their fleets....which is occuring on an accelerated scale, now.

As for BA, this is an excellent opportunity to get a larger marketing foothold in the American market.
411A is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 13:26
  #4 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,884
Received 156 Likes on 50 Posts
My question is..why do so many US based airlines have so many old, crappy and fuel sucking aircraft in thier fleets..they never seem to update, but seem lost in the 70/80s....or am I wrong?
SOPS is online now  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 14:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With some exceptions...yes you are wrong.
411A is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 14:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dirt cheap fuel and nil environmental policy has not required them (companies) to update their fleets. To be fair the americans have been using twins across the pond for decades long before the EC released its value.
HZ123 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 16:04
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin USA
Age: 65
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why haven't US airlines bought new airplanes?

Short answer? Deregulation Act of 1978.

Real answer? Actually it is more of a case of retaining older aircraft to maintain competitive market share.

Until fuel prices went north of $100/barrel it was more economical to operate paid-for MD80's than purchase expensive 737-800's (FAA wire bundle debacles not-withstanding).

Now with fuel so dear, DC9 numbers in the US are dropping like a Beech Bonanza full of Doctors. At American we operate 325 MD80's with 45 slated for early retirement. Northwest has 92 even older DC9's that will see the scrap heap soon. United announced retirement of their entire 737-300/400 fleet last week (94 aircraft) and will consequently furlough 950 flight crew.

Myself, I am facing my second furlough from American in five years. When my former airline was "acquired", my seniority date was "adjusted" by 12 years and post 9/11 I went from a MD80 command position to the street in a year and one half.

Here we go again!!

Dave
doodahdave is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 19:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SFO
Age: 45
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Additionally, it may be easy to update a fleet of 100-200 aircraft; a fleet of over 700 airplanes however, is much more difficult to 're-new'.
JuniorMan is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 20:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Coast UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

With all due respect 411a, any airline that outsources its cabin crew is on to an immediate loser. The cabin crew are the saving grace of almost any carrier - quite often the only company employees the pax will come across. I work for BA and trust me, the outsourcing plan is causing a huge back lash already and no firm plans have yet been shared. It will almost certainly fail - well with BA at least. I understand AA are losing $3.3m a day, so I guess they need to be a lot more draconian in their approach, but NOT with their crew.
ForwardGalley is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 20:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Not here any more.
Posts: 646
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forward Galley

Have you seen AA's cabin crew? Many "Angry grandmothers". I'm sure BA can teach them a thing or two about inflight service.
NG_Kaptain is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 20:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ForwardGalley is sadly mistaken.
New young (pretty) faces are what count in todays competative CC world, and neither BA nor AA have the edge in this department. One need only look at SQ, MAS, CX etc, to see the difference.

The only thing one can say about the more senior AA and BA CC is....they are expendable, and should be shown the exit door at the first available opportunity.
Period.

These older/higher paid CC are not that hard to miss, and cabin service will NOT suffer one little bit, when eager twenty-somethings are hired/trained in their place.

Out with the old, in with the new.

And no, this does not apply to pilots, as these folks don't sling the hash/drinks to the punters.

CC, dime a dozen, and should be paid accordingly....which ain't much.
411A is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 20:56
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Coast UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good to see that 411a is still spouting tosh like an old broken record. Or is that an old broken (bitter & twisted?) L1011 flight deck person. See so many of those Tristars everywhere these days don't we?

Tired old views designed to have a pop at an entire worldwide industry in turmoil. Still 411a is probably revelling in his retirement whilst feebly attempting to stay in touch.

Best advice old chap, stick to a forum where someone might give a flying **** about your rather strange views. A management one might be a good place to start.
ForwardGalley is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2008, 22:00
  #13 (permalink)  

the lunatic fringe
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Everywhere
Age: 67
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I own some AA stock, I have also written to the company suggesting that they cut costs further by outsourcing CC such as BA is proposing.
411A: I am am sure they are actioning your every proposal. Indeed I am sure they monitor your every post on PPRuNe just in case they miss any words of your wisdom.

Just amazing.
L337 is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 00:00
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: La La Land
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of idiot buys airline stock, much less US airline stock? We obviously should listen carefully to 411A. Could you do my investing please?
Glacier1900 is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 00:03
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly 411 is correct.

You see, the job is no longer what we want it to be. Flying first rate planes, getting our work done in about 10 days...lots of days off, fun over nights with beautiful flight attendants.


It is now, working at least 20 days. Older planes with outsourced mx. Older flight attendants (some are still good looking). Crummy hotels. Half the pay we wanted and the pax hate us. Pensions zapped.

And the glory of the wild blue has been tarnished too.

To dodah dave in wisconsin...I am sorry that AA screwed over TWA pilots. Believe me, I've seen stuff like that happen. You are a real airline pilot! Those who speak of how stuff like that never happens, don't know a trim knob from a Toga switch.


SO, the airlines that **** their crews over will survive. And someday, the pilots will be able to get their stuff together and make something decent again.
sevenstrokeroll is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 01:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,073
Received 144 Likes on 65 Posts
One need only look at SQ, MAS, CX etc, to see the difference
Yeah it kind of helps when at least one of those airlines work under labour laws which would not exist in any 'real' democracy.

Imagine if a Western airline fired a flight attendant because she fell pregnant.

As for the job cuts I'd be interested to see how much the executives make in bonuses out of this too. I know there are a few issues along those lines at United with pilot furlough.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 02:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What kind of idiot buys airline stock, much less US airline stock?
Google Bernard Baruch, Glacier1900, and you might learn something.

AA is in a rather strong cash position, and with its recent proposed marketing agreement with BA, should do quite well.
Sir Richard will not be pleased, however.
411A is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 02:40
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: US
Posts: 507
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Once again 411a has hit it on the head. This time re stewardess. He is in good company. None other than the bearded one has repeatedly told his CC staff that they are cheap to replace and it is a "glam" job for a young thing to do for a few years and move on. And he is not going to pay his CC BA wages.

You might not like it but it is true. Have you ever seen AA advertise an "AA girl" on a billboard?

20driver
20driver is online now  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 04:13
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wisconsin USA
Age: 65
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deregulation has triumphed!

Remember when air transport was a luxury? Reserved for the privileged jet set? Prosperous passengers flying around the world in First Class being attended to by nubile Stewardesses.

Where are they now?

Those lucrative customers are instead flying point to point in fractional business jets having former airline Captains hand carry their bags.

Yes, deregulation has triumphed by turning airline travel into yet another public commodity. Why put up with the frustration of queuing for yet another TSA probe (don't forget your plastic bags and remember to remove your shoes!), sorting oneself through a US hub airport, then missing your connection because of ATC delays and possibly losing your $15 bag?

Today, high yield passengers are not swayed by comely young flight attendants serving chateaubriand. Eliminating the hassles and discomfort of flying with the masses is what appeals to the jet set nowadays. Airlines can't supply that and yields suffer because of it.

How does Southwest do so well? They don't suffer under the misconception that they provide a luxury product, they know air travel is a commodity and they provide a competitive and consistent product.

The rest of us are still figuring that part out.

Dave
doodahdave is offline  
Old 4th Jul 2008, 04:25
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: La La Land
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bernard Mannes Baruch heh? Died in 1965? Before deregulation? Huh, thank you.
Hey, I just got a couple hot stock tips for you: Microsoft and something called "the internet." I think it will be huge. I would give you more hot tips but I outsourced my guy. Now he shows up late, lips me off and sh**s on the carpet.
Glacier1900 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.