Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Jettison over Berlin

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Jettison over Berlin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th May 2008, 08:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Europe
Age: 51
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jettison over Berlin

Heard an AF flight in the air last night with medical emergency requesting ATC permission to dump fuel, which was denied as the a/c was over Berlin. However, Capt insisted he'd dump fuel beforing landing 08 (Tegel?) and said there was no time for the ATC suggested radar vectors away from city. ATC reluctantly agreed. I am not a long-haul pilot widebody, so this is out of my depth, but can anyone enlighten me why it is not possible to simply land overweight and have a heavy landing check done, rather than jeopardising the short -and long term health of the Berlin population, with carcinogenic hydrocarbon compounds lingering in the environment for years to come?
Comanche is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 08:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So long as the dumping is done at a reasonable altitude, almost all will evaporate and disperse well before it gets to earth... and that which does get to earth will be blown by the wind - so "over the city" becomes academic.

I am almost certain the residents at Berlin are far more at risk from the millions of cars / buildings spewing out combustion products than a small amount of unburnt hydrcarbons that may, or may not, have arrived in Berlin.

Landing overweight is "emergency" only. The medical situation may have lent itself to that, but not at the expense of using a fitted Fuel Dump system...

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 09:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"last night?"
AF 0184 enroute from CDG to HKG landet at 4 pm local at Tegel airport. Might have been another one?
Kerosene Kraut is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 09:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: where I lay my hat
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Comanche,
The problem of landing a heavy over weight is not a structural one (if it is a twin, it has to be able to land at max take off mass for certification, not sure about 4 engine requirments). The main issue is the brakes. If you land heavy, the brakes will overheat and you will lose a lot of your fusible plugs and therefore probably will not be able to taxi off the runway.
So what you have to consider when thinking about landing overweight for a medical emergency is that if you do land over weight you will probably not be able to vacate the runway and maybe even evacuate if you overrun or your brakes catch fire. This will not help the poor person who is dying in the back!
The best bet is to spend a few minutes dumping fuel and then land as near to max landing weight as possible!
Hope this helps!

Last edited by EFIScomp; 27th May 2008 at 10:11.
EFIScomp is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 09:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe you might wanna go to Leipzig instead. Longer runways, less traffic, hospitals around and AF regional offices.
Kerosene Kraut is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 10:15
  #6 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The main issue is the brakes. If you land heavy, the brakes will overheat and you will loose(sic) alot(sic) of your fusible plugs and therefore probably will not be able to taxi off the runway.
Complete and utter nonsense.
M.Mouse is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 10:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: England
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How completely and utterly patronising.

It depends on actual aircraft, actual weight, and actual runway length.
Captain Jumbo is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 10:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 60
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know a biz jet operator in Asia who having lost their fusible plugs have not only been able to taxi but also continue to operate the aircraft until its next inspection
rmac is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 11:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok M.Mouse, but what's the solution ?

Landing overweight seems a larger risk to the aircraft, its' occupants, and quite possibly the local residents.

I'm not so sure about the lack of stuctural worries, and would think the brakes etc a low priority - after all the chap sounds a bit of a hero to me, he by-passed ATC B.S. in attempting to save a life...

Anyway, re. Berlin, "they started it !" ( please take that as 'tongue in cheek' ) !

Actually Kerosene Krauts' suggestion seems eminently sensible - maybe such local knowledge was not available on board, or indeed failed to be passed on by ATC ?
Double Zero is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 11:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe you might wanna go to Leipzig instead. Longer runways, less traffic, hospitals around and AF regional offices.
Within 5 min by car from Tegel Airport there are two major hospitals (Virchow+DRK) well equipped for emergencies. Landing in Leipzig you have a 20-30 min drive to the university hospital. So for the passenger Berlin was a better option. Also while Berlin is a densely populated city, except for the last app. 8 nm of approach to Tegel from both sides you fly over mostly woods and farmland.

Because of the proximity of good hospitals, Tegel is probably one of the best airports worldwide for medical diversions if you don't have a specialized helicopter in standby.
Interflug is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 11:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interflug,

Thanks, that makes a lot of things clearer - and the relevant Captain's decision seems righter than ever !
Double Zero is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 11:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
...rather than jeopardising the short -and long term health of the Berlin population, with carcinogenic hydrocarbon compounds lingering in the environment for years to come?
The Berliners smoke like chimneys, drink like fish and eat high cholesterol meals. I don't think a little jet fuel will bother them.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 12:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Imagine some Lufthansa flight enroute from Frankfurt to the US with a medical emergency onboard spraying fuel over London, no vectors, and insisting to go right into LHR.
Kerosene Kraut is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 12:38
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Age: 58
Posts: 179
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>The Berliners smoke like chimneys, drink like fish and eat high cholesterol meals. I don't think a little jet fuel will bother them.

This (non-smoking) Berliner agrees.

And...
Luckily I wasn't having a barbeque yesterday, or else we aaaalll could have diiiiieeeed!
flugholm is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 15:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So to avoid getting Sam'd, or even shot by a Tornado if one didn't see it off with an airliner, I hope there's a system in place - I am NOT asking what - whereby a genuine emergency can be descriminated from naughty people with evil intentions - or do we just blow away anything a bit dodgy ?! A good job the Berlin ATC didn't...

In the strange few days after 9/11, I knew of a particularly tired & overweight Cessna 172 which was vectored to check out some lost soul near Windsor !

They could only give a rough ident' as the PA-28 with retracts pulled away rapidly - my suggestion of applying an ' Interceptor' zap didn't catch on.
Double Zero is offline  
Old 20th May 2008, 19:19
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<Imagine some Lufthansa flight enroute from Frankfurt to the US with a medical emergency onboard spraying fuel over London, no vectors, and insisting to go right into LHR>>

What are e supposed to imagine? I'm an ex Heathrow controller who has seen something similar on several occasions, albeit not Lufthansa. Medical emergencies are treated very seriously by ATC.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 21st May 2008, 07:54
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cloud 9
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing has approved overweight landings (B744) for some time now, especially in cases such as medical emergencies. Of course, airline SOP's may state differently and would override the manufacturers' recommendations.If the landing is not 'firm', then a quick inspection is required, before release to service. However, if the landing is 'firm' then a more extensive check is required.Reducing weight to conform with the placarded max. ldg. wt. should not be restricted to "dire emergency only".
point8six is offline  
Old 21st May 2008, 08:19
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Planet Zog
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HD,

A few years back as we were climbing out of London towards STU we heard a BA PAN call - returning to LHR due medical emergency. As we climbed to FL 220 we saw an opposite direction coming towards us, just 1000ft above us, apparntly contrailling. I asked if the the returning a/c was dumping fuel, and Nigel duly replied that he was - news to both ATC and ourselves. We were immediately vectored to the SW to avoid flying into one large kerosene cloud. Dumping fuel should only be done with ATC approval as there are other factors involved other than those on board.
A330driver is offline  
Old 21st May 2008, 08:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to recall Tegel is not that long. Presumably he dumped because an overweight 747 and a short runway.......?
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 21st May 2008, 09:09
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dunstable, Beds UK
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All this rhetoric about fuel dumping and overweight landing is truly facinating.
Now !
What about the many aircraft that do not have fuel dump ( And they are legion!)

At least it removes all this decision making !
GotTheTshirt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.