Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

New Security Measures for Women

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

New Security Measures for Women

Old 13th Feb 2002, 22:53
  #1 (permalink)  
ijp
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: New York
Posts: 135
Post New Security Measures for Women

WASHINGTON, D.C.- The FAA is set to unleash a firestorm. .of criticism early next week when it issues a directive to. .airlines calling for "close, hands-on inspection" of all. .women with large breasts who are checking in for flights.

The agency had considered this step for some time, as is. .quite easy to conceal large amounts of C-4 inside a. .brassiere, but after last month's incident when a terrorist. .concealed explosives inside his shoes, the FAA feels it has. .no choice but to proceed.

Tests have shown that a 42D bra can easily contain sufficient. .explosives to fatally damage a 747. And many bras,. .especially the very popular Wonderbra, have wire harnesses. .built in which can easily be adapted to a detonation mechanism.

"The problem is not the size of the mammaries,. . per se, but to determine if what is inside them is indeed,. . the real thing, so to speak. Breasts have a certain feel,. .a certain consistency of texture, which is far different. .from C-4, and about the only way you can determine if. .the real thing, as it were, is to subject them to a. .vigorous pat-down and squeeze," an agency spokesman. .said yesterday.

Critics, especially NOW, have been quick to voice their. .opposition. "It's profiling, it's sexist, and it's. .discriminatory," NOW's legal counsel reported. "And. .besides, it's not the chest measurement, it's the CUP size. .that counts. Everyone knows a 32D is far more dangerous. .than a 38AA."

NOW is going to write to Atty. General. .Ashcroft to demand that he personally take a hands-on. .approach to developing standards for these inspections. "As. .women, NOW recognizes the need for enhanced security, but. .come, on, this is a dangerous jiggling of our. .Constitutional rights."

NOW has stated that they will advise all their members to. .refuse to be patted down and squeezed, rather they will. .suggest that their members remove their blouses and bras at. .the check-in gate to prove that they are not concealing. .any contraband. When told of this, the FAA spokesman. .responded, "YEEECCCHHH! Have you ever seen these NOW. .ladies?"

Aside from increased airline safety, another positive from. .this new directive is an expecting quintupling of the. .number of applicants of for the position of security. .screeners at airports. Indeed, demand for applications is so. .high that the government is considering lowering the. .starting salary. Said Transportation Secretary Norman. .Mineta, "Obviously, if you have a popular job position,. .where people are beating down the door to apply, you don't. .have to pay a competitive wage. This could save the. .government, and ultimately the airlines, billions each year"

In a related development, it is expected that Hollywood. .elebrities like Madonna, Pamela Anderson, and Jennifer. .Lopez, will soon abandon their private jets, in order to. .fly commercial. Paparazzi are already scoping out the. .best locations.

The new security procedures will no doubt result in lengthy. .delays. "Before, when we had delays at airports, we would. .say that planes were 'stacked up,'" one FAA wag noted,. .though off the record. "This gives a whole new meaning. .to the term 'stacked,'" he snickered.. .When asked what was the FAA's policy on breast implants,. .the spokesman said that were well aware of the question. .and were studying it avidly, but "they needed more time to. .get their hands around the size of the problem."

Finally, the White House has announced that former. .President Bill Clinton has volunteered his services. .free of charge to train Airport Screeners.
ijp is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2002, 23:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 195
Talking

Shouldn't this be in JetBlast? Nice wind up though!
OzPax1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.