Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

American 757 diverted - smoke in cabin

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

American 757 diverted - smoke in cabin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2008, 05:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
American 757 diverted - smoke in cabin

Jan 30, 9:00pm MST

EWR to LAX, landed at KGJT (Walker Field, Grand Junction, Colorado) details slim but apparently no injuries...
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 06:09
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
More detail, ex Grand Junction News Sentinel via RockyMountainNews.com 11:54 p.m. 01/30/08

An American Airlines 757 carrying an estimated 103 passengers and 17,000 pounds of fuel was forced to land at Grand Junction Regional Airport Wednesday evening, due to reports of “smoke in the cabin.”

The flight — #119 which originated in Newark and bound for Los Angeles — made a safe emergency landing at the Grand Junction airport around 10:15 p.m. There were no injuries to passengers or flight crew members, and people were evacuated directly onto the tarmac as soon as the wheels came to a stop along the runway.

According to fire officials who responded to the scene, the smoke is thought to have started due to a fire that began at the back of the aircraft. Firefighters with the Grand Junction Fire Department conducted thermal imaging in an attempt to pinpoint the exact location of the fire.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 13:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another AA 757 incident

Plane makes emergency landing in Fla. after smoke fills cockpit

Last Update: 5:21 am

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) -- Smoke filled the cockpit of an American Airlines flight from Puerto Rico on Wednesday, forcing an emergency landing, an airport official said.

Several passengers were transported to the airport, but the injuries were not considered life threatening.

The plane had left San Juan for Philadelphia and landed safely at Palm Beach International Airport, said Casandra Davis, an airport spokeswoman.

American Airlines spokeswoman Mary Frances Fagan said the captain reported smoke in the cockpit about two hours into the trip of Flight 1738. As the plane made its descent into the airport in Palm Beach, the inner window pane cracked and sprayed glass into the cockpit. The outer window pane was not damaged and the plane did not lose cabin pressure, she said.

She said a passenger and the first officer on the plane were taken to the hospital. Later, the captain and three flight attendants were also taken to the hospital.

The plane, a Boeing 757, carried 139 passengers and a crew of seven.

Fagan said another plane was being brought in from Fort Lauderdale to complete the flight to Philadelphia on Wednesday night.

The Federal Aviation Administration is investigating
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 14:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Copilot Breaks Out Windshield!

Local West Palm Beach TV news reported the copilot was injured trying to break out a cockpit window so they could see. Nice feat at 300 knots through a multi paned bird proof window.

New Smoke in Cockpit Checklist.

1 O2 mask on.
2. Break out cockpit windshield
.... etc.

Sad reporting. They later got the story straight. Probably a malfunction in the windshield heating element?
jfill is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 17:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EGHI
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Several passengers were transported to the airport, but the injuries were not considered life threatening.
I hope all the passengers were transported to the airport! Or did they plan to jettison some enroute to reduce landing weight?
alexpc is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 17:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly, another example of incompetent journalism. You'd think that editors of these rags would learn their lesson after numerous botched reporting incidents concerning aviation. But, it's obvious that sensationalism is the goal, and not accurate and professional reporting.
Roadtrip is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 19:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really doesn't matter if they dumped fuel or not, when you have something as serious as fire on board you will try to land ASAP.
xxgunnerxx is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 19:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Alabama
Age: 58
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is really sad is that most of the posts here are complaing about the journalists and the way was reported than to comment about the fact of smoke......
FrequentSLF is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 20:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Initial reports were that they were descending to land at PBI because of smoke in the cockpit when the inner pane failed on the fo's windshield so unless they had two simutaneous problems the window heat controller must have been smoking and subsequently caused the inner pane to fail.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 21:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do wonder if the crew donned their protective gear? And if they did it quickly enough?
sevenstrokeroll is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 22:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What protective gear?
100BMEP is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 22:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: somewhere in Western Canada
Posts: 202
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.radans.net/jens/planestory.html
CaptW5 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 22:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: California
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really doesn't matter if they dumped fuel or not, when you have something as serious as fire on board you will try to land ASAP.
Ideally yes. Swissair 111 was one of those cases where the straight shot to Halifax was delayed for a fuel dump. Its an interesting tradeoff I am sure for the crew:

1) land heavy. $$$ + reputation
2) dump fuel an play beat the clock
morbos is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 22:55
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: On the Climb
Age: 55
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Canada DC9 in Cincinatti played beat the clock. This resulted in a loss of life. Expeditious descent and subsequent landing required at all times with reports of smoke. A simple SOP I hope you agree.
grundyhead is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 22:57
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Protective gear for pilots in a smoke situation would include:

1. face mask or goggles
2. pressure fed oxygen/mask...

a face mask would have oxygen fed from a cockpit source... and is the more modern version, though seperate goggles and mask are still in use some places.

there is also a smoke hood that might be used for evacuation, but not likely in this case. the hood has a quick inflating oxygen charge and a longer lasting charge...even small LED lights to warn when the oxygen is running out.

as to dumping fuel, the 757 doesn't have fuel dumping capability. (correct me if I'm wrong). Fuel dumping starts with bigger planes and the easy to remember cutoff would be the 767...some have dumping, the early ones don't.
sevenstrokeroll is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 23:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since the Boeing 757 can not dump fuel, drop that subject. Just saw a video on TV showing the FO's windshield shattered. I have had two outer panes shatter but never an inner one letting glass in the cockpit. The outer panes have no restrictions, 250K max below 10,000. I guess if the FO's windshield is shattered it is simply the captains leg from there to landing. I am not sure why the 3 FA's and one passenger in back needed to go to the hospital with the cockpit crew. Glass can not get through a bullet proof door.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2008, 00:27
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why did the F/A's and pax have to go to the hospital? Frayed nerves. Very time consuming to stitch together.
misd-agin is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2008, 00:59
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the fuss over a plane with smoke in the cockpit? UA had one a couple of days ago in SEA....it happens fairly frequently.
boeingbusbenn is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2008, 01:00
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't know they had frayed nerves doctors standing by at hospitals now days. Most people have to make an appointment for that.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2008, 01:33
  #20 (permalink)  

Pilots' Pal
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: USA
Age: 63
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the fuss over a plane with smoke in the cockpit? UA had one a couple of days ago in SEA....it happens fairly frequently.
Why all the fuss? It's a reportable occurrence, at least in our neck of the woods.
Bus429 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.