Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Qantas B744 Total electrical failure?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Qantas B744 Total electrical failure?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jan 2008, 22:48
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

If the battery runs out, you've then also lost attitude reference. Somewhat of a problem if you're IMC at the time, or at night. So yes, the situation would've been extremely serious if they were in the middle of nowhere.?


If not in the middle of the ocean, maybe I would call for some military fighter escort before the batt run out? then I would follow them in formation

Has been done before
ecam dongso is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2008, 22:53
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,293
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
flying on battery with only the standby AI, standby airspeed, and standby altimeter is not easy in the 747-400
I thought the batteries would power more than those 3 instruments mentioned!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2008, 23:43
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Age: 64
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GPS's WITH LIMITED PSEUDO INSTRUMENTATION

The portable GPS units with pseudo instrumentation are produced by GARMIN. These are the 196 (B&W), 296 (Color), 396 (Color +) and 496 (Color ++). The instrumentation is all GPS derived and lags a bit. I've heard from others that they can fly by reference but would only do so in an extreme emergency. I guess this could have been...

My experience is that they do not receive too well under heated windshields. Of course this isn't normally a problem in a total electrical failure...

There are several charting options available for additional cost depending what part of the world you fly in.

https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=156

C2J
Cubs2jets is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 00:00
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah except I can't understand why it's called a ".......Flight Director", as it doesn't have "flight director" functionality! It certainly is much easier to read and interpret though because the instrument cross-scan becomes basically the same as if you were looking at the main instruments, whereas the cross-scan is totally different on the old standbys.

Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
I thought the batteries would power more than those 3 instruments mentioned!
They may well have had displays on the Captain's side and one EICAS screen if the standby inverters were working. It's not clear to me whether they were or not, as the fault was virtually the entire generator control panel/load distribution circuits shorting out. We'll find out in time I guess. And I don't know yet who the crew were so I can't ask anyone who was there!

Wouldn't have helped them if they were a couple of hours away from landing though!

Last edited by DutchRoll; 10th Jan 2008 at 00:23.
DutchRoll is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 00:19
  #65 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If all else fails, a glass of water on the coaming panel will give you attitude info.
HotDog is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 00:33
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 289
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Not if you fly co-ordinated turns it won't.
k3k3 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 00:36
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hot Dog

Absolute Bull S#$%$%
If you believe that a glass of water will do it then you are one DANGEROUS operator who should not be let loose within 10 Km of any aircraft.

Any reasonable pilot will be able to fly your glass of water through a complete barrel roll and not spill a drop.
Milt is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 00:40
  #68 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
enough about water...this thread started out with some thinking this was a non event...well a safe landing resulted...BUT

if this had happened and the plane had been lost we wouldn't even know the cause...spilled water under the pacific ocean wouldn't show up well.

I think the nose down descent may have contributed to the water spill...

I would like to propose that the NEW regs for standby power instrumentation should be FUEL EXHAUSTION PLUS 30 minutes.
sevenstrokeroll is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 00:44
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,293
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Not sure which post was the best gee-up, HotDog or Milt?


Any reasonable pilot will be able to fly your glass of water through a complete barrel roll and not spill a drop
If you get back on the ground without spilling the water, you have achieved your objective!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 00:44
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 71
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Hand flying

Well now perhaps crew flight checks in the sim could incorporate elements of hand flying skills even though the requirements are likely to be as rare as confirmed alien sightings and hens with teeth. Disable all the instruments requiring power (hopefully airspeed will still be available) and do a few approaches in dodgy but VFR conditions. See if you've got any of the old 'feel' in your flying. A handheld GPS will give an airspeed accurate to within a couple of knots even if there's complete loss of aircraft instruments.

As for IMC with instrument loss, big problem all round but the idea of a military shepherd has merit. Don't know how well a descent through cloud at night could be managed but it's gotta be a better option than nothing.

Has anyone ever done tests on 747s and the like as to stability in cloud? As it is such a stable aircraft in flight, if trimmed in visual conditions for say a 2000fpm descent at 250kts, what is the likelihood of coming out the bottom of the cloud right side up if the controls were left alone and only thrust monitored to keep airspeed within limits?

Doubt we'll see this problem again given the nature of the fault and the publicity. Will make a few systems engineers think twice for future designs though.
nojwod is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 00:54
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It might be time to bring back a battery powered 'Turn and Bank'
4Greens is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 01:11
  #72 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
sevenstrokeroll
if this had happened and the plane had been lost we wouldn't even know the cause...spilled water under the pacific ocean wouldn't show up well.
Would the FDR have shown the failure of the generators? It might then be possible to work backwards to what we know happened. Particularly as Qstar said:
We have blocked drains all over these planes water pours from all the Ice areas on landing. It flows in great amounts from the forward galley from coffee brewers, ice draws and drains. (onto the floor) The economy Galley OMG it some times floods the back of E zone half way down the cabin.
S/He said more in post #47 which is one that the senior mgmt at Qantas and Boeing ought to read.


On a lighter note ... in the Daily Mail article referenced earlier, I liked the heading:British holidaymakers' mid-air terror after jumbo jet loses all power Where it later said, "All we were told was that there was a slight power failure after the lights had flickered off and on," said 25-year-old Chloe Washbrook" So, it doesn't sound like they were that terrified.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 01:28
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dans ma bulle
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Several posters asked if the RAT was standard 747 equipment in reference to that particular case. I am flying the 767300ER and its RAT will only provide hydraulic power to the flight control part of the center system. It has nothing to do with standby electrical power, it is the HDG job (provided you still have hydraulic pressure).

My question is: do some RATs on different types provide direct electrical power backup?
Yo767 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 01:49
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: asia
Age: 51
Posts: 175
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A340 has a hydrualic powered AC gen that can be power by the rat if memory serves
buggaluggs is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 02:28
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the dark side of the moon
Posts: 976
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
A320 and A330 have a similar hydraulic powered STBY generator. Can be driven by the RAT if necessary.
J.O. is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 03:02
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the batteries would power more than those 3 instruments mentioned! (Capt Fathom)

I think that you are correct there. Acc my manual the main standby bus and the apu standby bus remain powered by their respective batteries for at least 30 mins. The main standby bus powers (among other things) the left EIU, left CDU, left ILS, left VOR, various flight control components, left ADC, left EFIS control panel, and the primary EICAS display.
Long Haul is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 04:15
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would the QAR, FDR or CVR record information following the loss of power, or lose a number of parameters?
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 05:04
  #78 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any reasonable pilot will be able to fly your glass of water through a complete barrel roll and not spill a drop.
Hey Milt, I very much doubt that any reasonable pilot would attempt a barrel roll in a 747 with total loss of instruments.
HotDog is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 05:05
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Not here
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there a battery or battery-bus controller/disconnector ??

Could the batteries have been thrown offline ??

How far would the battery controller, if it exists, be from the generator controllers ??
.
alph2z is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2008, 05:11
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Asia
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Milt

There's a lot of hate in the world...

Sounds like all your aerobatics have affected your stability.

Whilst we all feel like a barrel roll from time to time, a 744 over the oggie at night with nothing on the TV is probably not one of those times. I would go with the glass of water or a ruler on the finger over nothing.

Glass of water, BEX and a good lie down is what I would suggest.
Traffic is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.